Outpatient Dermatology Productivity Measures by Patient Race, Sex, and Age.

IF 11.5 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY JAMA dermatology Pub Date : 2024-12-23 DOI:10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.5286
Lauren A V Orenstein, John S Barbieri, Meron Siira, Ethan Borre, Krittin J Supapannachart, Eric Viera, Courtney Ann Prestwood, Robert Swerlick, Rachel E Patzer, Suephy C Chen
{"title":"Outpatient Dermatology Productivity Measures by Patient Race, Sex, and Age.","authors":"Lauren A V Orenstein, John S Barbieri, Meron Siira, Ethan Borre, Krittin J Supapannachart, Eric Viera, Courtney Ann Prestwood, Robert Swerlick, Rachel E Patzer, Suephy C Chen","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.5286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Clinical productivity measures may incentivize clinical care to specific patient populations and thus perpetuate inequitable care. Before the 2021 Medicare physician fee schedule changes, outpatient dermatology encounters for patients who were younger, female, and races other than White systematically generated fewer work relative value units (wRVUs).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the association of patient race, age, and sex with wRVUs generated by outpatient dermatology encounters after 2021.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This multi-institutional cross-sectional study evaluated demographic and billing data for outpatient dermatology encounters across 3 academic dermatology practices. The study compared wRVUs generated by outpatient general dermatology encounters in 6-month periods before and after the 2021 fee schedule updates (March 1 to August 31, 2019, and March 1 to August 31, 2021). Eligibility required an age of 18 years or older and available age, race, and sex data. Data analysis was performed from September 2022 to March 2024.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was wRVUs generated per encounter.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 89 656 encounters (47 607 before the 2021 Medicare physician fee schedule update and 42 049 after the update). Across all encounters, the mean (SD) patient age was 56.3 (17.8) years; 55 460 encounters (61.9%) were with female patients and 34 196 (38.1%) were with male patients; and 3457 encounters (3.9%) were with Asian patients, 10 478 (11.7%) with Black patients, 72 894 (81.3%) with White patients, and 2287 (3.2%) with patients of other race or ethnicity (Latino and multiracial). The mean (SD) wRVUs per outpatient dermatology encounter was 1.44 (0.88) before the update and 1.80 (0.99) after (P < .001). After 2021, adjusted analyses demonstrated significantly fewer wRVUs per encounter for female (β, -0.11; 95% CI, -0.13 to -0.10) compared with male patients, and for younger (β, 0.04 [95% CI, 0.04 to 0.05] per 10-year increase in age) compared with older patients. After the update, compared with White patients, visits with Asian patients generated fewer wRVUs (β, -0.12; 95% CI, -0.17 to -0.08) as did visits with Black patients (β, -0.14; 95% CI, -0.17 to -0.11), both statistically significant reductions compared with prior comparisons (P < .001 for both). After 2021, mediation analysis identified that premalignant destructions and biopsies mediated many of the remaining differences in wRVU generation by patient age, race, and sex.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This study found that after the 2021 Medicare fee schedule updates, there was a persistent, albeit reduced, gap between wRVU productivity in outpatient dermatology visits for Asian and Black compared with White patients. These persisting differences were attributable to skin biopsies and cryotherapy of premalignant lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.5286","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Clinical productivity measures may incentivize clinical care to specific patient populations and thus perpetuate inequitable care. Before the 2021 Medicare physician fee schedule changes, outpatient dermatology encounters for patients who were younger, female, and races other than White systematically generated fewer work relative value units (wRVUs).

Objective: To examine the association of patient race, age, and sex with wRVUs generated by outpatient dermatology encounters after 2021.

Design, setting, and participants: This multi-institutional cross-sectional study evaluated demographic and billing data for outpatient dermatology encounters across 3 academic dermatology practices. The study compared wRVUs generated by outpatient general dermatology encounters in 6-month periods before and after the 2021 fee schedule updates (March 1 to August 31, 2019, and March 1 to August 31, 2021). Eligibility required an age of 18 years or older and available age, race, and sex data. Data analysis was performed from September 2022 to March 2024.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was wRVUs generated per encounter.

Results: This study included 89 656 encounters (47 607 before the 2021 Medicare physician fee schedule update and 42 049 after the update). Across all encounters, the mean (SD) patient age was 56.3 (17.8) years; 55 460 encounters (61.9%) were with female patients and 34 196 (38.1%) were with male patients; and 3457 encounters (3.9%) were with Asian patients, 10 478 (11.7%) with Black patients, 72 894 (81.3%) with White patients, and 2287 (3.2%) with patients of other race or ethnicity (Latino and multiracial). The mean (SD) wRVUs per outpatient dermatology encounter was 1.44 (0.88) before the update and 1.80 (0.99) after (P < .001). After 2021, adjusted analyses demonstrated significantly fewer wRVUs per encounter for female (β, -0.11; 95% CI, -0.13 to -0.10) compared with male patients, and for younger (β, 0.04 [95% CI, 0.04 to 0.05] per 10-year increase in age) compared with older patients. After the update, compared with White patients, visits with Asian patients generated fewer wRVUs (β, -0.12; 95% CI, -0.17 to -0.08) as did visits with Black patients (β, -0.14; 95% CI, -0.17 to -0.11), both statistically significant reductions compared with prior comparisons (P < .001 for both). After 2021, mediation analysis identified that premalignant destructions and biopsies mediated many of the remaining differences in wRVU generation by patient age, race, and sex.

Conclusions and relevance: This study found that after the 2021 Medicare fee schedule updates, there was a persistent, albeit reduced, gap between wRVU productivity in outpatient dermatology visits for Asian and Black compared with White patients. These persisting differences were attributable to skin biopsies and cryotherapy of premalignant lesions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
病人种族、性别和年龄的门诊皮肤科生产力测量。
重要性:临床生产力措施可能会激励对特定患者群体的临床护理,从而使不公平护理永久化。在2021年医疗保险医生收费计划改变之前,年轻、女性和非白人种族患者的门诊皮肤科就诊系统地产生了更少的工作相对价值单位(wRVUs)。目的:研究2021年以后门诊皮肤科就诊患者的种族、年龄和性别与wrvu的关系。设计、设置和参与者:这项多机构横断面研究评估了3个学术皮肤科实践中门诊皮肤科就诊的人口统计和计费数据。该研究比较了2021年收费计划更新前后(2019年3月1日至8月31日,以及2021年3月1日至8月31日)6个月内门诊普通皮肤科就诊产生的wrvu。资格要求年龄在18岁或以上,并提供年龄、种族和性别数据。数据分析时间为2022年9月至2024年3月。主要结局和测量:主要结局是每次接触产生的wRVUs。结果:本研究包括89次 656次就诊(47次 607次在2021年医疗保险医生收费计划更新之前,42次 049次更新之后)。所有患者的平均(SD)年龄为56.3岁(17.8岁);女性患者55 460例(61.9%),男性患者34 196例(38.1%);亚洲患者3457例(3.9%),黑人患者10478例(11.7%),白人患者72894例(81.3%),其他种族或民族(拉丁裔和多种族)患者2287例(3.2%)。更新之前,每次门诊皮肤科就诊的平均(SD) wRVU为1.44(0.88),更新后为1.80(0.99)。结论和相关性:本研究发现,在2021年医疗保险收费计划更新后,与白人患者相比,亚裔和黑人门诊皮肤科就诊的wRVU生产率存在持续的差距,尽管差距有所缩小。这些持续的差异可归因于皮肤活检和癌前病变的冷冻治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA dermatology
JAMA dermatology DERMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
5.50%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: JAMA Dermatology is an international peer-reviewed journal that has been in continuous publication since 1882. It began publication by the American Medical Association in 1920 as Archives of Dermatology and Syphilology. The journal publishes material that helps in the development and testing of the effectiveness of diagnosis and treatment in medical and surgical dermatology, pediatric and geriatric dermatology, and oncologic and aesthetic dermatologic surgery. JAMA Dermatology is a member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. It is published online weekly, every Wednesday, and in 12 print/online issues a year. The mission of the journal is to elevate the art and science of health and diseases of skin, hair, nails, and mucous membranes, and their treatment, with the aim of enabling dermatologists to deliver evidence-based, high-value medical and surgical dermatologic care. The journal publishes a broad range of innovative studies and trials that shift research and clinical practice paradigms, expand the understanding of the burden of dermatologic diseases and key outcomes, improve the practice of dermatology, and ensure equitable care to all patients. It also features research and opinion examining ethical, moral, socioeconomic, educational, and political issues relevant to dermatologists, aiming to enable ongoing improvement to the workforce, scope of practice, and the training of future dermatologists. JAMA Dermatology aims to be a leader in developing initiatives to improve diversity, equity, and inclusion within the specialty and within dermatology medical publishing.
期刊最新文献
Imiquimod Cream Preceded by Superficial Curettage vs Surgical Excision for Nodular Basal Cell Carcinoma: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. Serum Immunoglobulin G Levels and Nicastrin Variation in Hidradenitis Suppurativa. Verrucous Tungiasis. Errors in Abstract, Results, and Table 1. Hidradenitis Suppurativa Surgery Complication Rates Among Patients With Obesity or Diabetes or Who Smoke: A Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1