Comparison of Different Local Anaesthetics in Cervical Facet Medial Branch Blockade.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY World neurosurgery Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2024.123585
Hanzade Aybüke Ünal, Ahmet Başarı, Güngör Enver Özgencil, Özgün Ömer Asiller, Başak Ceyda Meço
{"title":"Comparison of Different Local Anaesthetics in Cervical Facet Medial Branch Blockade.","authors":"Hanzade Aybüke Ünal, Ahmet Başarı, Güngör Enver Özgencil, Özgün Ömer Asiller, Başak Ceyda Meço","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2024.123585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cervical medial branch blocks (CMBB) are frequently used for the treatment of facet arthropathy. The present study compares the effectiveness of lidocaine and prilocaine in CMBB procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with facet arthropathy scheduled for CMBB were randomly divided into two groups who were administered a combination of 2 mg dexamethasone and either 1% lidocaine or 1% prilocaine with a total volume of 1 mL per level. All patients were assessed prior to the procedure (baseline), and at 1 hour, 1 week and 1 month after the procedure using the Numeric Rating Scale-11 (NRS-11), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and patient satisfaction was evaluated at 1 hour, 1 week and 1 month after the procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 97 patients were included in the study (n = 49 in the lidocaine group and n = 48 in the prilocaine group). A significant decrease was noted in the NRS-11 and NDI scores recorded during all follow-up assessments in both groups (p<0.001), while the NRS-11, NDI scores and patient satisfaction did not statistically differ between groups at 1 hour, 1 week and 1 month following the procedure (p˃0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CMMB achieved with either lidocaine or prilocaine decreased the recorded pain severity and disability scores to a similar degree. The selection of either lidocaine or prilocaine for CMBB is thus at the clinician's discretion.</p>","PeriodicalId":23906,"journal":{"name":"World neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"123585"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.123585","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Cervical medial branch blocks (CMBB) are frequently used for the treatment of facet arthropathy. The present study compares the effectiveness of lidocaine and prilocaine in CMBB procedures.

Methods: Patients with facet arthropathy scheduled for CMBB were randomly divided into two groups who were administered a combination of 2 mg dexamethasone and either 1% lidocaine or 1% prilocaine with a total volume of 1 mL per level. All patients were assessed prior to the procedure (baseline), and at 1 hour, 1 week and 1 month after the procedure using the Numeric Rating Scale-11 (NRS-11), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and patient satisfaction was evaluated at 1 hour, 1 week and 1 month after the procedure.

Results: A total of 97 patients were included in the study (n = 49 in the lidocaine group and n = 48 in the prilocaine group). A significant decrease was noted in the NRS-11 and NDI scores recorded during all follow-up assessments in both groups (p<0.001), while the NRS-11, NDI scores and patient satisfaction did not statistically differ between groups at 1 hour, 1 week and 1 month following the procedure (p˃0.05).

Conclusion: CMMB achieved with either lidocaine or prilocaine decreased the recorded pain severity and disability scores to a similar degree. The selection of either lidocaine or prilocaine for CMBB is thus at the clinician's discretion.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World neurosurgery
World neurosurgery CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
1765
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: World Neurosurgery has an open access mirror journal World Neurosurgery: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The journal''s mission is to: -To provide a first-class international forum and a 2-way conduit for dialogue that is relevant to neurosurgeons and providers who care for neurosurgery patients. The categories of the exchanged information include clinical and basic science, as well as global information that provide social, political, educational, economic, cultural or societal insights and knowledge that are of significance and relevance to worldwide neurosurgery patient care. -To act as a primary intellectual catalyst for the stimulation of creativity, the creation of new knowledge, and the enhancement of quality neurosurgical care worldwide. -To provide a forum for communication that enriches the lives of all neurosurgeons and their colleagues; and, in so doing, enriches the lives of their patients. Topics to be addressed in World Neurosurgery include: EDUCATION, ECONOMICS, RESEARCH, POLITICS, HISTORY, CULTURE, CLINICAL SCIENCE, LABORATORY SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES, CLINICAL IMAGES, VIDEOS
期刊最新文献
Comparative Efficacy of Endovascular Therapy and Microsurgery in Treating Ophthalmic Artery Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Modified Frailty Index Questionnaire as a Predictor of Discharge Destination in Elderly Patients Undergoing Multilevel Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Extracranial Carotid Artery Aneurysms: A Comprehensive Analysis of its Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Management: A Scoping Review. Comparison of Different Local Anaesthetics in Cervical Facet Medial Branch Blockade. Disparities Attributable to Sex Differences in 4680 Lumbar Fusion Outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1