Treatment Effectiveness of Volar Plates in Distal Radius Dorsal Rim Fractures.

Q3 Medicine Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia Pub Date : 2024-12-21 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1790579
Uğur Bezirgan, Erdinç Acar, Yener Yoğun, Merve Dursun Savran, Ömer Halit Keskin, Mehmet Armangil
{"title":"Treatment Effectiveness of Volar Plates in Distal Radius Dorsal Rim Fractures.","authors":"Uğur Bezirgan, Erdinç Acar, Yener Yoğun, Merve Dursun Savran, Ömer Halit Keskin, Mehmet Armangil","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1790579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective</b>  To assess the efficacy of distal radius volar plates in cases involving dorsal fragments at the Ulnar Corner (UC) and Lister Tubercle (LT). <b>Methods</b>  A retrospective study that included patients with distal radius fractures (DRFs) featuring UC and LT dorsal fragments treated with volar plates. The exclusion criteria comprised lunate facet fractures, UC fragment ratio below 25%, and patients treated with dorsal plates. Radiographic and tomographic measurements included radial length (RL), radial inclination (RI), ulnar variance (UV), palmar tilt (PT), fragment areas, UC fragment ratio, and displacement. The scores on the Gartland Werley (GW) classification and on the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, as well as grip strength, and range of motion (ROM), were assessed. <b>Results</b>  The study involved 17 male and 5 female subjects (mean age: 39.7 ± 10.7 years). The UC and LT fragments displayed mean areas of 1.6 ± 0.7cm <sup>2</sup> and UC fragment ratio of 0.4 ± 0.1. The fixation rates for UC and LT fragments were of 18.2% and 31.8% respectively. Improved RI, UV, and PT were noted postoperatively. The mean GW and DASH scores were of 2.1 ± 2.0 and 4.3 ± 3.2 respectively. Grip strength on the operated side was of 89.5 ± 9.8% of the healthy side, and at least 90.9% of the patients achieved adequate ROM. <b>Conclusion</b>  While volar plates are the standard treatment for intra-articular DRFs, displaced dorsal fragments can impact the outcomes. Mini dorsal incisions may aid in the fixation of UC fragments that are challenging to secure with volar plates, preserving joint health.</p>","PeriodicalId":21536,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia","volume":"59 6","pages":"e981-e990"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11663069/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1790579","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective  To assess the efficacy of distal radius volar plates in cases involving dorsal fragments at the Ulnar Corner (UC) and Lister Tubercle (LT). Methods  A retrospective study that included patients with distal radius fractures (DRFs) featuring UC and LT dorsal fragments treated with volar plates. The exclusion criteria comprised lunate facet fractures, UC fragment ratio below 25%, and patients treated with dorsal plates. Radiographic and tomographic measurements included radial length (RL), radial inclination (RI), ulnar variance (UV), palmar tilt (PT), fragment areas, UC fragment ratio, and displacement. The scores on the Gartland Werley (GW) classification and on the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, as well as grip strength, and range of motion (ROM), were assessed. Results  The study involved 17 male and 5 female subjects (mean age: 39.7 ± 10.7 years). The UC and LT fragments displayed mean areas of 1.6 ± 0.7cm 2 and UC fragment ratio of 0.4 ± 0.1. The fixation rates for UC and LT fragments were of 18.2% and 31.8% respectively. Improved RI, UV, and PT were noted postoperatively. The mean GW and DASH scores were of 2.1 ± 2.0 and 4.3 ± 3.2 respectively. Grip strength on the operated side was of 89.5 ± 9.8% of the healthy side, and at least 90.9% of the patients achieved adequate ROM. Conclusion  While volar plates are the standard treatment for intra-articular DRFs, displaced dorsal fragments can impact the outcomes. Mini dorsal incisions may aid in the fixation of UC fragments that are challenging to secure with volar plates, preserving joint health.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
掌侧钢板治疗桡骨远端背缘骨折疗效观察。
目的探讨桡骨远端掌侧钢板治疗尺角(UC)背侧碎片和李斯特结节(LT)的疗效。方法回顾性研究桡骨远端骨折(DRFs)患者,伴有UC和LT背侧碎片,经掌侧钢板治疗。排除标准包括月骨小关节面骨折,UC碎片率低于25%,以及使用背侧钢板治疗的患者。x线摄影和断层摄影测量包括桡骨长度(RL)、桡骨倾角(RI)、尺侧方差(UV)、手掌倾斜(PT)、碎片面积、UC碎片比例和位移。评估Gartland Werley (GW)分类和手臂、肩部和手部残疾(DASH)问卷得分,以及握力和活动范围(ROM)。结果男性17例,女性5例,平均年龄39.7±10.7岁。UC和LT碎片的平均面积为1.6±0.7cm 2, UC碎片比为0.4±0.1。UC和LT碎片的固定率分别为18.2%和31.8%。术后观察到RI、UV和PT的改善。平均GW和DASH评分分别为2.1±2.0和4.3±3.2。手术侧握力为健康侧的89.5±9.8%,至少90.9%的患者获得足够的ROM。结论掌侧钢板是关节内DRFs的标准治疗方法,但背侧碎片移位会影响疗效。小的背侧切口可能有助于UC碎片的固定,这些碎片很难用掌侧钢板固定,从而保持关节健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
142
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊最新文献
Hip Hemiarthroplasty in Patients with Multiple Myeloma: A Retrospective Case Series and Review of the Literature. Long-term Outcomes 18 Years after the Arthroscopic Fixation of a Scapular Articular Fracture: A Case Report. Malunion in a Self-stabilized Fracture of the Odontoid Process Type II with a Chronic Anterior Atlantoaxial Subluxation in a Neurologically Intact Patient: A Case Report. Reichel Syndrome in Children: A Case Report. Minimally-invasive Distal Metatarsal Diaphyseal Osteotomy in the Treatment of Plantar Ulcer in the Diabetic Foot: A Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1