Feared self and morality in obsessive-compulsive phenomena.

IF 3.8 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL British Journal of Clinical Psychology Pub Date : 2024-12-22 DOI:10.1111/bjc.12527
Yoon-Hee Yang, Tess Jaeger, Richard Moulding
{"title":"Feared self and morality in obsessive-compulsive phenomena.","authors":"Yoon-Hee Yang, Tess Jaeger, Richard Moulding","doi":"10.1111/bjc.12527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent studies have shown that individuals with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) tend to endorse a feared self that they perceive to be immoral, insane and/or dangerous. The current study investigated the relationship between morality-related feared self, self-relevance and OC-related cognitions and behaviours such as moral deliberation, threat interpretation bias, discomfort, urge to act and likelihood of acting in OC-relevant situations in a non-clinical sample.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 78 participants (27 female, M<sub>age</sub> = 29.85, SD = 9.8) underwent a priming study. Participants had their feared-self primed firstly via an unscrambling task in either a feared self or neutral condition and secondly via a writing task about moral transgressions. The response time for these tasks was recorded as a measurement of moral deliberation. Further, self-relevance was primed by having half of the participants' complete tasks that referenced their actions, whereas half of the participants completed tasks that referenced others' actions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>It was found that participants' pre-existing level of feared self was linked to threat interpretation bias, discomfort and urge to act in OC-relevant situations. A primed sense of feared self and self-relevance also demonstrated significant links to changes in OC-relevant symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results indicate that environmental cues related to morality may lead to OC-related symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":48211,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjc.12527","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recent studies have shown that individuals with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) tend to endorse a feared self that they perceive to be immoral, insane and/or dangerous. The current study investigated the relationship between morality-related feared self, self-relevance and OC-related cognitions and behaviours such as moral deliberation, threat interpretation bias, discomfort, urge to act and likelihood of acting in OC-relevant situations in a non-clinical sample.

Method: A total of 78 participants (27 female, Mage = 29.85, SD = 9.8) underwent a priming study. Participants had their feared-self primed firstly via an unscrambling task in either a feared self or neutral condition and secondly via a writing task about moral transgressions. The response time for these tasks was recorded as a measurement of moral deliberation. Further, self-relevance was primed by having half of the participants' complete tasks that referenced their actions, whereas half of the participants completed tasks that referenced others' actions.

Results: It was found that participants' pre-existing level of feared self was linked to threat interpretation bias, discomfort and urge to act in OC-relevant situations. A primed sense of feared self and self-relevance also demonstrated significant links to changes in OC-relevant symptoms.

Conclusion: These results indicate that environmental cues related to morality may lead to OC-related symptoms.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在强迫现象中恐惧自我和道德。
背景:最近的研究表明,患有强迫症(OCD)的个体倾向于认可一个他们认为不道德、疯狂和/或危险的恐惧自我。本研究以非临床样本为研究对象,探讨了道德相关的恐惧自我、自我关联与强迫症相关的认知和行为之间的关系,如道德考虑、威胁解释偏见、不适、行动冲动和在强迫症相关情境下行动的可能性。方法:78名被试(女性27名,Mage = 29.85, SD = 9.8)进行启动研究。参与者首先在恐惧的自我或中立的条件下通过一项解读任务来启动他们的恐惧自我,然后通过一项关于道德犯罪的写作任务来启动他们的恐惧自我。这些任务的反应时间被记录下来,作为衡量道德思考的一项指标。此外,有一半的参与者完成了与自己的行为相关的任务,而有一半的参与者完成了与他人的行为相关的任务,从而启动了自我关联。结果:研究发现,被试的恐惧自我存在水平与威胁解释偏差、不适和行动冲动有关。启动的恐惧自我和自我相关感也显示出与oc相关症状变化的显著联系。结论:这些结果提示与道德相关的环境线索可能导致强迫症相关症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.20%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Clinical Psychology publishes original research, both empirical and theoretical, on all aspects of clinical psychology: - clinical and abnormal psychology featuring descriptive or experimental studies - aetiology, assessment and treatment of the whole range of psychological disorders irrespective of age group and setting - biological influences on individual behaviour - studies of psychological interventions and treatment on individuals, dyads, families and groups
期刊最新文献
A randomized controlled trial testing theory-driven enhancements to increase the efficacy of and engagement in a brief cognitive-behavioural therapy text-message intervention for co-occurring posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms and alcohol misuse. Using machine learning to increase access to and engagement with trauma-focused interventions for posttraumatic stress disorder. Improving access to psychological intervention in low-middle income settings: Results from a waitlist-controlled, proof-of-concept trial of the MemFlex intervention for trauma-exposed Afghan youth. 'School-based screen-and-treat': An effective blueprint for expediating access to care in children experiencing PTSD following disasters. A pilot study of a brief and scalable psychosocial intervention for children and adolescents following disasters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1