[Effectiveness and tolerance of azathioprine as first-line treatment for multiple sclerosis: a case study from Morocco].

IF 0.9 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pan African Medical Journal Pub Date : 2024-09-18 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.11604/pamj.2024.49.16.38051
Ali Mirhani, Nabila Auajjar, Chouki Slimani, Benaissa Attarassi
{"title":"[Effectiveness and tolerance of azathioprine as first-line treatment for multiple sclerosis: a case study from Morocco].","authors":"Ali Mirhani, Nabila Auajjar, Chouki Slimani, Benaissa Attarassi","doi":"10.11604/pamj.2024.49.16.38051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>the purpose of our study is to evaluate the efficacy of azathioprine as first-line treatment in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) or progressive multiple sclerosis (PMS), who were supposed to be treated with beta-interferons but, due to limited resources, received azathioprine instead.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>among the 31 patients, 17 had relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), 11 had primary progressive MS (PPMS), and 3 had secondary progressive MS (SPMS). Patients received azathioprine orally at a dose of 3 mg/kg/day over 2 years. The effect of azathioprine was assessed using the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score. Compare means t-test was used to determine the treatment performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>for RRMS, the mean EDSS score ranged between 4.2 and 3.6±1.4. A total of 82.4% of patients were stable or improved, with a very highly significant difference (P= 0.000). For PPMS, the mean EDSS score remained constant at 5.7 ±0.4. A total of 54.5% of patients showed stability or improvement, with a highly significant difference (P= 0.005). In the case of SPMS, the mean EDSS score ranged between 4.5 and 4.1±1.3. A total of 66.7% of patients were stable or improved but with a non-significant difference (P= 0.1).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>the results of this study confirm that azathioprine is beneficial in the treatment of different types of multiple sclerosis in Morocco.</p>","PeriodicalId":48190,"journal":{"name":"Pan African Medical Journal","volume":"49 ","pages":"16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11662217/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pan African Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2024.49.16.38051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: the purpose of our study is to evaluate the efficacy of azathioprine as first-line treatment in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) or progressive multiple sclerosis (PMS), who were supposed to be treated with beta-interferons but, due to limited resources, received azathioprine instead.

Method: among the 31 patients, 17 had relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), 11 had primary progressive MS (PPMS), and 3 had secondary progressive MS (SPMS). Patients received azathioprine orally at a dose of 3 mg/kg/day over 2 years. The effect of azathioprine was assessed using the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score. Compare means t-test was used to determine the treatment performance.

Results: for RRMS, the mean EDSS score ranged between 4.2 and 3.6±1.4. A total of 82.4% of patients were stable or improved, with a very highly significant difference (P= 0.000). For PPMS, the mean EDSS score remained constant at 5.7 ±0.4. A total of 54.5% of patients showed stability or improvement, with a highly significant difference (P= 0.005). In the case of SPMS, the mean EDSS score ranged between 4.5 and 4.1±1.3. A total of 66.7% of patients were stable or improved but with a non-significant difference (P= 0.1).

Conclusion: the results of this study confirm that azathioprine is beneficial in the treatment of different types of multiple sclerosis in Morocco.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[氮唑嘌呤作为多发性硬化一线治疗的有效性和耐受性:来自摩洛哥的案例研究]。
本研究的目的是评估硫唑嘌呤作为复发-缓解型多发性硬化症(RRMS)或进行性多发性硬化症(PMS)患者一线治疗的疗效,这些患者本应接受β -干扰素治疗,但由于资源有限,转而接受硫唑嘌呤治疗。方法:31例患者中,复发缓解型MS (RRMS) 17例,原发进行性MS (PPMS) 11例,继发进行性MS (SPMS) 3例。患者口服硫唑嘌呤,剂量为3mg /kg/天,持续2年。使用扩展残疾状态量表(EDSS)评分评估硫唑嘌呤的效果。采用比较均值t检验确定治疗效果。结果:RRMS患者的平均EDSS评分在4.2 ~ 3.6±1.4之间。82.4%的患者病情稳定或好转,差异有非常显著性意义(P= 0.000)。对于PPMS,平均EDSS评分保持不变,为5.7±0.4。54.5%的患者病情稳定或改善,差异有高度统计学意义(P= 0.005)。在SPMS病例中,平均EDSS评分在4.5到4.1±1.3之间。共有66.7%的患者病情稳定或改善,但差异无统计学意义(P= 0.1)。结论:本研究结果证实硫唑嘌呤对摩洛哥不同类型多发性硬化症的治疗有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pan African Medical Journal
Pan African Medical Journal PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
691
期刊最新文献
Lessons learned during the establishment of a functional National Public Health Institute in the Democratic Republic of Congo: from 2018 to 2024. Effect of short-term chanting on electroencephalographic microstates. Harnessing genomics and translational research to improve health in Africa: a report of the 13th African Society of Human Genetics meeting in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Home processed complementary foods, caregivers' knowledge, attitude, and practice in a rural community in Kenya: a mixed method study. The prevalence and microbiological features of Staphylococcus species isolation from healthcare personnel in a dental clinic in Tripoli, Libya.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1