[Clinical Study of Lymph Node Dissection in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer].

Shotaro Hatano, Takayuki Goto, Jin Kono, Takayuki Sumiyoshi, Kimihiko Masui, Takuma Sato, Takeshi Sano, Atsuro Sawada, Shusuke Akamatsu, Takahiro Inoue, Osamu Ogawa, Takashi Kobayashi
{"title":"[Clinical Study of Lymph Node Dissection in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer].","authors":"Shotaro Hatano, Takayuki Goto, Jin Kono, Takayuki Sumiyoshi, Kimihiko Masui, Takuma Sato, Takeshi Sano, Atsuro Sawada, Shusuke Akamatsu, Takahiro Inoue, Osamu Ogawa, Takashi Kobayashi","doi":"10.14989/ActaUrolJap_70_11_367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We retrospectively analyzed the regions and perioperative outcomes associated with lymph node dissection in patients with prostate cancer. Of 543 patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer with or without lymph node dissection according to the modified D'Amico criteria, 333 (61.3%), 128 (23.6%), and 82 (15.1%) were classified into the non-dissection, limited dissection, and extended dissection groups, respectively. Lymph node metastasis was identified in eight patients : one in the limited dissection group and seven in the extended dissection group. Notably, all eight biopsies showed Gleason scores of 4+4 or higher, and the initial prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration was ≥10 ng/ml in seven of these patients. Lymph node metastasis was detected in areas other than the obturator lymph nodes in five patients (62.5%). Although there was no significant difference in the rate of Clavien- Dindo grade ≥II complications among the three groups, six patients (7.3%) in the extended dissection group developed infectious lymphoceles. In the extended dissection group, the PSA progression-free survival (PSA-PFS) was significantly shorter in patients with than in those without lymph node metastasis (p<0.001). Because lymph node metastases were rare in the limited dissection group in our cohort of patients with a high risk of localized prostate cancer, achieving a diagnosis seems difficult with limited dissection. By contrast, in the extended dissection group, the PSA-PFS prognosis was significantly worse in lymph node-positive cases. Therefore, considering the high complication risk of lymphoceles, extended dissection should be performed in patients with a high likelihood of lymph node metastasis.</p>","PeriodicalId":39291,"journal":{"name":"Acta Urologica Japonica","volume":"70 11","pages":"367-372"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Urologica Japonica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14989/ActaUrolJap_70_11_367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We retrospectively analyzed the regions and perioperative outcomes associated with lymph node dissection in patients with prostate cancer. Of 543 patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer with or without lymph node dissection according to the modified D'Amico criteria, 333 (61.3%), 128 (23.6%), and 82 (15.1%) were classified into the non-dissection, limited dissection, and extended dissection groups, respectively. Lymph node metastasis was identified in eight patients : one in the limited dissection group and seven in the extended dissection group. Notably, all eight biopsies showed Gleason scores of 4+4 or higher, and the initial prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration was ≥10 ng/ml in seven of these patients. Lymph node metastasis was detected in areas other than the obturator lymph nodes in five patients (62.5%). Although there was no significant difference in the rate of Clavien- Dindo grade ≥II complications among the three groups, six patients (7.3%) in the extended dissection group developed infectious lymphoceles. In the extended dissection group, the PSA progression-free survival (PSA-PFS) was significantly shorter in patients with than in those without lymph node metastasis (p<0.001). Because lymph node metastases were rare in the limited dissection group in our cohort of patients with a high risk of localized prostate cancer, achieving a diagnosis seems difficult with limited dissection. By contrast, in the extended dissection group, the PSA-PFS prognosis was significantly worse in lymph node-positive cases. Therefore, considering the high complication risk of lymphoceles, extended dissection should be performed in patients with a high likelihood of lymph node metastasis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器人辅助前列腺根治术治疗高危前列腺癌淋巴结清扫的临床研究
我们回顾性分析前列腺癌患者淋巴结清扫的相关区域和围手术期结果。543例前列腺癌患者接受机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术,伴有或不伴有淋巴结清扫,根据修改的D’amico标准,分别有333例(61.3%)、128例(23.6%)和82例(15.1%)被分为非清扫组、有限清扫组和扩大清扫组。8例患者发现淋巴结转移:1例在有限夹层组,7例在扩大夹层组。值得注意的是,所有8例活检均显示Gleason评分为4+4或更高,其中7例患者的初始前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)浓度≥10 ng/ml。5例患者(62.5%)在闭孔淋巴结以外的区域发现淋巴结转移。虽然三组间Clavien- Dindo分级≥II级并发症发生率无显著差异,但扩大夹层组有6例(7.3%)患者出现感染性淋巴细胞。在扩大夹层组中,有淋巴结转移的患者PSA无进展生存期(PSA- pfs)明显短于无淋巴结转移的患者(p<0.001)。由于在我们的局限性前列腺癌高风险患者队列中,淋巴结转移在有限清扫组中很少见,因此在有限清扫组中获得诊断似乎很困难。相比之下,在扩大夹层组中,淋巴结阳性病例的PSA-PFS预后明显较差。因此,考虑到淋巴囊肿的高并发症风险,对于淋巴结转移可能性高的患者应进行扩大清扫。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Urologica Japonica
Acta Urologica Japonica Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
期刊最新文献
[The Case of Solitary Adrenal Metastasis of Urothelial Carcinoma]. [The Introduction of Pubic Hair into the Bladder : A Possibility of an Alternate Mechanism]. [A Case of Metastatic Testicular Cancer after Kidney Transplantation in which Complete Remission was Achieved]. [A Case of Pelvic Arteriovenous Malformation in a Male with Massive Bladder Bleeding which Caused Severe Hemorrhagic Hypovolemic Shock]. [Risk Factor of Cutaneous Symptoms Associated with Enfortumab Vedotin for Urothelial Carcinoma].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1