Giovanni Federico Torsello, Konstantinos Stavroulakis, Gregory Chlouverakis, Giovanni Battista Torsello
{"title":"Cobalt Chromium or Stainless Steel Balloon-Expandable Bare Metal Stents for Iliac Occlusive Disease?","authors":"Giovanni Federico Torsello, Konstantinos Stavroulakis, Gregory Chlouverakis, Giovanni Battista Torsello","doi":"10.1177/15266028241306068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To compare the performance of a new-generation cobalt-chromium balloon-expandable bare metal stent with a stainless steel platform for the treatment of iliac occlusive disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients treated for symptomatic iliac occlusive disease between 2014 and 2021 with the cobalt-chromium Dynetic-35 or the stainless steel Dynamic platform were retrospectively evaluated. Outcome measures included technical success, device- or procedure-related death, clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), primary patency, and major index limb amputation up to 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 222 Cobalt chromium (CC) stents were used in 159 patients (34.6% female; mean age 66.9 ± 9.5 years) for the treatment of 216 lesions, while 234 iliac lesions of 182 patients (34.6% female; mean age 66.3 ± 9.9 years) were treated with 252 stainless steel (SS) stents. The mean lesion length (30.2 ± 12.8 mm vs 28.7 ± 22.5 mm, p=0.36) and the mean calcification grade (2.0 vs 1.9, p=0.07) did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. Patients treated by the CC platform were more frequently on statins (p<0.001), whereas more active smokers and subjects with higher Rutherford class underwent a SS deployment (p<0.001). Technical success was significantly higher in the SS group (100% vs 97.3%; p=0.01). This was due to longitudinal deformation or stent dislocation after passing the Dynetic-35 with endovascular material. After 1 year, no difference was found following CC and SS stent deployment in terms of device- or procedure-related deaths (0.6% vs 1.1%, p=0.99), target limb amputations (1.9% vs 1.6%, p=0.99), primary patency (91.3% vs 93.5%), and CD-TLR (6.5% vs 2.8% p=0.07).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Through 1 year, cobalt-chromium and stainless steel balloon-expandable stents are safe and effective in the treatment of iliac occlusive disease. Enhanced attention should be given passing the cobalt-chromium stent with endovascular devices to avoid procedural complications.</p><p><strong>Clinical impact: </strong>Stents with a thin-strut structure improve the flexibility and deliverability. The lower profile also increases the applicability lowering the risk of vascular access complications. In this study newer-generation cobalt chromium balloon-expandable stent did not confer advantages over stainless steel bare metal stent. On contrary, the technical success was inferior to stainless steel stents as longitudinal deformation or dislocation of the Dynetic-35 occurred. Therefore, enhanced attention should be given passing a Cobalt chromium stent with wires, catheters or sheaths to avoid stent deformation.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"15266028241306068"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028241306068","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: To compare the performance of a new-generation cobalt-chromium balloon-expandable bare metal stent with a stainless steel platform for the treatment of iliac occlusive disease.
Methods: Consecutive patients treated for symptomatic iliac occlusive disease between 2014 and 2021 with the cobalt-chromium Dynetic-35 or the stainless steel Dynamic platform were retrospectively evaluated. Outcome measures included technical success, device- or procedure-related death, clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), primary patency, and major index limb amputation up to 12 months.
Results: In total, 222 Cobalt chromium (CC) stents were used in 159 patients (34.6% female; mean age 66.9 ± 9.5 years) for the treatment of 216 lesions, while 234 iliac lesions of 182 patients (34.6% female; mean age 66.3 ± 9.9 years) were treated with 252 stainless steel (SS) stents. The mean lesion length (30.2 ± 12.8 mm vs 28.7 ± 22.5 mm, p=0.36) and the mean calcification grade (2.0 vs 1.9, p=0.07) did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. Patients treated by the CC platform were more frequently on statins (p<0.001), whereas more active smokers and subjects with higher Rutherford class underwent a SS deployment (p<0.001). Technical success was significantly higher in the SS group (100% vs 97.3%; p=0.01). This was due to longitudinal deformation or stent dislocation after passing the Dynetic-35 with endovascular material. After 1 year, no difference was found following CC and SS stent deployment in terms of device- or procedure-related deaths (0.6% vs 1.1%, p=0.99), target limb amputations (1.9% vs 1.6%, p=0.99), primary patency (91.3% vs 93.5%), and CD-TLR (6.5% vs 2.8% p=0.07).
Conclusions: Through 1 year, cobalt-chromium and stainless steel balloon-expandable stents are safe and effective in the treatment of iliac occlusive disease. Enhanced attention should be given passing the cobalt-chromium stent with endovascular devices to avoid procedural complications.
Clinical impact: Stents with a thin-strut structure improve the flexibility and deliverability. The lower profile also increases the applicability lowering the risk of vascular access complications. In this study newer-generation cobalt chromium balloon-expandable stent did not confer advantages over stainless steel bare metal stent. On contrary, the technical success was inferior to stainless steel stents as longitudinal deformation or dislocation of the Dynetic-35 occurred. Therefore, enhanced attention should be given passing a Cobalt chromium stent with wires, catheters or sheaths to avoid stent deformation.
背景:比较新一代钴铬球囊可膨胀裸金属支架与不锈钢支架治疗髂闭塞性疾病的效果。方法:回顾性评估2014 - 2021年间连续使用钴铬Dynetic-35或不锈钢Dynamic平台治疗症状性髂闭塞疾病的患者。结局指标包括技术成功、器械或手术相关死亡、临床驱动的靶病变血运重建术(CD-TLR)、原发性通畅和长达12个月的主要下肢截肢。结果:159例患者共使用222个钴铬(CC)支架(女性34.6%;平均年龄66.9±9.5岁)治疗病变216例,而234例髂病变182例(女性34.6%;平均年龄66.3±9.9岁),采用252不锈钢(SS)支架治疗。两组患者的平均病变长度(30.2±12.8 mm vs 28.7±22.5 mm, p=0.36)和平均钙化程度(2.0 vs 1.9, p=0.07)差异无统计学意义。结论:经过1年时间,钴铬和不锈钢球囊扩张支架治疗髂闭塞性疾病是安全有效的。通过血管内装置置入钴铬支架时应给予高度重视,以避免手术并发症。临床影响:支架采用薄支架结构,可提高灵活性和可移植性。较低的轮廓也增加了适用性,降低了血管通路并发症的风险。在本研究中,新一代钴铬球囊膨胀支架并不比不锈钢裸金属支架具有优势。相反,由于dynamic -35发生纵向变形或错位,技术上的成功不如不锈钢支架。因此,通过带金属丝、导管或护套的钴铬支架时应格外注意,以避免支架变形。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Endovascular Therapy (formerly the Journal of Endovascular Surgery) was established in 1994 as a forum for all physicians, scientists, and allied healthcare professionals who are engaged or interested in peripheral endovascular techniques and technology. An official publication of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (ISEVS), the Journal of Endovascular Therapy publishes peer-reviewed articles of interest to clinicians and researchers in the field of peripheral endovascular interventions.