Outcomes of Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implantation with Subsequent Trans-Scleral Diode Cyclophotocoagulation as the Main Intervention if IOP Remained Medically Uncontrolled.

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) Pub Date : 2024-12-17 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S498973
Sunita Radhakrishnan, Nadiya Kots-Gotlib, Terri-Diann Pickering, Jordan McCurdy, Joshua Siu, Don Pham, Andrew G Iwach
{"title":"Outcomes of Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implantation with Subsequent Trans-Scleral Diode Cyclophotocoagulation as the Main Intervention if IOP Remained Medically Uncontrolled.","authors":"Sunita Radhakrishnan, Nadiya Kots-Gotlib, Terri-Diann Pickering, Jordan McCurdy, Joshua Siu, Don Pham, Andrew G Iwach","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S498973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) implantation with subsequent trans-scleral diode cyclophotocoagulation (CPC) as the main intervention if IOP remained medically uncontrolled.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Charts of 108 consecutive eyes (90 patients) that underwent AGV implantation from 2003 to 2018 at a single clinical practice were retrospectively reviewed. The procedure was considered a failure if any of the following occurred: additional incisional glaucoma surgery, IOP >21 mmHg or < 20% reduction from baseline on 2 consecutive study visits after 3 months, IOP ≤ 5 mmHg on 2 consecutive study visits after 3 months, loss of light perception, or AGV removal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean follow-up time was 5.4 ± 3.1 years. Diode CPC was performed in 32%. The mean IOP was 24.8 ± 8.2 mmHg before intervention, and 12.5 ± 5.6 mmHg at last follow-up (p<0.0001). The mean logMAR VA decreased by 0.24 (p=0.002). The success rate was 68%. The reasons for failure were additional incisional glaucoma surgery in 7%, AGV removal in 4%, loss of light perception in 4%, inadequate IOP reduction in 13%, and IOP ≤ 5 mm HG in 6%. The probability of survival by Kaplan Meier analysis was 88%, 76% and 69% at 1, 3, and 5 years after the procedure, respectively. Complications of AGV and CPC were comparable to those previously reported in the literature.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The treatment approach of AGV implantation with subsequent trans-scleral diode CPC, as needed, was successful in over 2/3rd of subjects. This study adds to the literature supporting the use of CPC when IOP is medically uncontrolled after AGV.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":"18 ","pages":"3825-3836"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11662913/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S498973","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) implantation with subsequent trans-scleral diode cyclophotocoagulation (CPC) as the main intervention if IOP remained medically uncontrolled.

Patients and methods: Charts of 108 consecutive eyes (90 patients) that underwent AGV implantation from 2003 to 2018 at a single clinical practice were retrospectively reviewed. The procedure was considered a failure if any of the following occurred: additional incisional glaucoma surgery, IOP >21 mmHg or < 20% reduction from baseline on 2 consecutive study visits after 3 months, IOP ≤ 5 mmHg on 2 consecutive study visits after 3 months, loss of light perception, or AGV removal.

Results: The mean follow-up time was 5.4 ± 3.1 years. Diode CPC was performed in 32%. The mean IOP was 24.8 ± 8.2 mmHg before intervention, and 12.5 ± 5.6 mmHg at last follow-up (p<0.0001). The mean logMAR VA decreased by 0.24 (p=0.002). The success rate was 68%. The reasons for failure were additional incisional glaucoma surgery in 7%, AGV removal in 4%, loss of light perception in 4%, inadequate IOP reduction in 13%, and IOP ≤ 5 mm HG in 6%. The probability of survival by Kaplan Meier analysis was 88%, 76% and 69% at 1, 3, and 5 years after the procedure, respectively. Complications of AGV and CPC were comparable to those previously reported in the literature.

Conclusion: The treatment approach of AGV implantation with subsequent trans-scleral diode CPC, as needed, was successful in over 2/3rd of subjects. This study adds to the literature supporting the use of CPC when IOP is medically uncontrolled after AGV.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
如果IOP在医学上不受控制,Ahmed青光眼瓣膜植入术后经巩膜二极管光凝治疗的结果。
目的:评价艾哈迈德青光眼瓣膜(AGV)植入术后经巩膜二极管光凝术(CPC)作为主要干预措施在眼压医学上无法控制的情况下的疗效和安全性。患者和方法:回顾性分析2003年至2018年在同一临床实践中连续108眼(90例)进行AGV植入的病历。如果发生以下任何情况,则认为该手术失败:额外的切口青光眼手术,3个月后连续两次研究访问IOP低于21 mmHg或比基线降低< 20%,3个月后连续两次研究访问IOP≤5 mmHg,光感知丧失或AGV移除。结果:平均随访时间5.4±3.1年。二极管CPC占32%。干预前平均IOP为24.8±8.2 mmHg,最后随访时平均IOP为12.5±5.6 mmHg。结论:根据需要,AGV植入后经巩膜二极管CPC治疗方法的成功率超过2/3。本研究增加了支持在AGV术后眼压医学上无法控制时使用CPC的文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of IMO vifa24plus(1-2) and Humphrey Field Analyzer 24-2. Visual Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction of Two Continuous Range of Vision Intraocular Lenses. Application of the 2021 AAPOS Guidelines in Clinics with Revision and Validation of SPOT Referral Criteria. Clinical Evaluation of Faricimab in Real-World Diabetic Macular Edema in India- A Multicenter Observational Study. Propensity Score to Compare Pars Plana Vitrectomy and Scleral Buckling in Retrospective Studies [Letter].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1