Dental Suction Interference and Acoustic Respiratory Monitoring.

Eimi Tabata, Yoshitaka Shimizu, Kana Oue, Noboru Saeki, Shinichiro Ohshimo, Akari Mukai, Hitomi Ishikawa, Hisanobu Kamio, Mitsuhiro Yoshida, Nobuaki Shime
{"title":"Dental Suction Interference and Acoustic Respiratory Monitoring.","authors":"Eimi Tabata, Yoshitaka Shimizu, Kana Oue, Noboru Saeki, Shinichiro Ohshimo, Akari Mukai, Hitomi Ishikawa, Hisanobu Kamio, Mitsuhiro Yoshida, Nobuaki Shime","doi":"10.2344/23-00017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Previous studies have reported that the noise generated by dental equipment can interfere with the auscultation of respiratory sounds during sedation. Therefore, this study aimed to identify whether positing the acoustic sensor on the chest or cervical position would be least susceptible to interference from dental suction device noise, a prominent noise noted during respiratory sound monitoring during dental sedation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective cohort study was conducted with 30 students. Sound intensity (dB) and frequency (kHz) levels from the dental suction were recorded from the cervical and chest regions under both oral and nasal breathing conditions and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean intensity of dental suction sounds was significantly lower in the chest region compared with the cervical region, regardless of the breathing condition (P < .001). Furthermore, in the chest region, the mean sound frequency during oral breathing was significantly lower than that during nasal breathing (P < .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study suggests that monitoring respiratory sounds in the chest region can significantly reduce interference from noise generated by dental suction devices compared with monitoring at the cervical region.</p>","PeriodicalId":94296,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia progress","volume":"71 4","pages":"171-175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11614464/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia progress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2344/23-00017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Previous studies have reported that the noise generated by dental equipment can interfere with the auscultation of respiratory sounds during sedation. Therefore, this study aimed to identify whether positing the acoustic sensor on the chest or cervical position would be least susceptible to interference from dental suction device noise, a prominent noise noted during respiratory sound monitoring during dental sedation.

Methods: This prospective cohort study was conducted with 30 students. Sound intensity (dB) and frequency (kHz) levels from the dental suction were recorded from the cervical and chest regions under both oral and nasal breathing conditions and analyzed.

Results: The mean intensity of dental suction sounds was significantly lower in the chest region compared with the cervical region, regardless of the breathing condition (P < .001). Furthermore, in the chest region, the mean sound frequency during oral breathing was significantly lower than that during nasal breathing (P < .01).

Conclusions: Our study suggests that monitoring respiratory sounds in the chest region can significantly reduce interference from noise generated by dental suction devices compared with monitoring at the cervical region.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
牙吸干扰与呼吸声监测。
目的:以往的研究报道了牙科设备产生的噪音会干扰镇静过程中呼吸音的听诊。因此,本研究旨在确定将声传感器放置在胸部或颈部是否最不容易受到牙科吸引器噪音的干扰,这是在牙科镇静期间呼吸声音监测中注意到的一种突出的噪音。方法:对30名学生进行前瞻性队列研究。记录口腔和鼻腔呼吸条件下颈部和胸部吸牙声强(dB)和频率(kHz)水平并进行分析。结果:与呼吸条件无关,胸部吸音的平均强度明显低于颈部(P < 0.001)。在胸部区域,口腔呼吸时的平均声频显著低于鼻腔呼吸时的平均声频(P < 0.01)。结论:我们的研究表明,与颈部监测相比,监测胸部呼吸音可以显著减少吸牙器产生的噪音干扰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Review of Current Literature of Interest to the Office-Based Anesthesiologist. Anesthetic Management of a Patient With a Giant Hemangioma Who Required Urgent Embolization for Bleeding During Third Molar Extractions. Assessment of Ketamine's Influence on In Vitro Angiogenesis. Examining Liposomal Bupivacaine's Use in Dentistry. Experience of General Anesthesia for Glossopexy in Infants With Robin Sequence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1