Liposomal Bupivacaine Use in Third Molar Impaction Surgery: INNOVATE Study.

Anesthesia progress Pub Date : 2024-12-04 DOI:10.2344/333161
Stuart E Lieblich, Hassan Danesi
{"title":"Liposomal Bupivacaine Use in Third Molar Impaction Surgery: INNOVATE Study.","authors":"Stuart E Lieblich, Hassan Danesi","doi":"10.2344/333161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The analgesic efficacy and safety of liposomal bupivacaine (LB) in third molar extraction was evaluated in this phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of subjects undergoing bilateral third molar extraction. Subjects were randomized 2: 1 to infiltration with LB (133 mg/10 mL) or placebo, and received opioid rescue medication as needed. Primary efficacy measure was cumulative area under the curve (AUC) of numeric rating scale (NRS) pain severity scores through 48 hours (AUC of NRS0-48) postsurgery. Other measures included AUC of NRS0-24, AUC of NRS0-72, and AUC of NRS0-96, and incidence of adverse events. There were 150 subjects in the primary efficacy population (n = 99 LB, n = 51 placebo) and 89 in the per-protocol population (n = 59 LB, n = 30 placebo). Least-squares mean for AUC of NRS0-48 was 172.3 LB versus 194.7 placebo (P = .227) in the primary efficacy population and 120.8 LB versus 183.3 placebo (P = .023) in the per-protocol population. At all time points, between-group differences in AUC of NRS scores were significant in the per-protocol population (LB lower than placebo, P < .05) but not in the primary efficacy population. The adverse event profile was similar between groups. LB produced significantly lower cumulative pain scores versus placebo at all time points in the per-protocol analysis but not in the primary efficacy analysis because of protocol violations. This study indicates significant improvement in pain scores in the third molar model, but because of extensive protocol violations additional studies are warranted to demonstrate effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":94296,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia progress","volume":"71 4","pages":"199-207"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11614472/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia progress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2344/333161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The analgesic efficacy and safety of liposomal bupivacaine (LB) in third molar extraction was evaluated in this phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of subjects undergoing bilateral third molar extraction. Subjects were randomized 2: 1 to infiltration with LB (133 mg/10 mL) or placebo, and received opioid rescue medication as needed. Primary efficacy measure was cumulative area under the curve (AUC) of numeric rating scale (NRS) pain severity scores through 48 hours (AUC of NRS0-48) postsurgery. Other measures included AUC of NRS0-24, AUC of NRS0-72, and AUC of NRS0-96, and incidence of adverse events. There were 150 subjects in the primary efficacy population (n = 99 LB, n = 51 placebo) and 89 in the per-protocol population (n = 59 LB, n = 30 placebo). Least-squares mean for AUC of NRS0-48 was 172.3 LB versus 194.7 placebo (P = .227) in the primary efficacy population and 120.8 LB versus 183.3 placebo (P = .023) in the per-protocol population. At all time points, between-group differences in AUC of NRS scores were significant in the per-protocol population (LB lower than placebo, P < .05) but not in the primary efficacy population. The adverse event profile was similar between groups. LB produced significantly lower cumulative pain scores versus placebo at all time points in the per-protocol analysis but not in the primary efficacy analysis because of protocol violations. This study indicates significant improvement in pain scores in the third molar model, but because of extensive protocol violations additional studies are warranted to demonstrate effectiveness.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
布比卡因脂质体在第三磨牙嵌塞手术中的应用:创新研究。
在这项双盲、安慰剂对照的三期研究中,对接受双侧第三磨牙提取的受试者进行了布比卡因脂质体(LB)在第三磨牙提取中的镇痛效果和安全性评估。受试者按2∶1随机分为LB (133 mg/10 mL)浸润组和安慰剂组,并根据需要接受阿片类药物抢救治疗。主要疗效指标为术后48小时数值评定量表(NRS)疼痛严重程度评分的累积曲线下面积(AUC) (NRS0-48)。其他指标包括NRS0-24的AUC、NRS0-72的AUC和NRS0-96的AUC,以及不良事件的发生率。主要有效人群中有150名受试者(n = 99 LB, n = 51安慰剂),按方案人群中有89名受试者(n = 59 LB, n = 30安慰剂)。在主要疗效人群中,NRS0-48的AUC的最小二乘平均值为172.3 LB,而安慰剂组为194.7 LB (P = 0.227);在按方案人群中,NRS0-48的AUC为120.8 LB,而安慰剂组为183.3 LB (P = 0.023)。在所有时间点,NRS评分的AUC在按方案人群中组间差异显著(LB低于安慰剂,P < 0.05),但在主要疗效人群中无显著差异。两组之间的不良事件概况相似。在每个方案分析的所有时间点,与安慰剂相比,LB产生的累积疼痛评分显着降低,但在主要疗效分析中,由于违反了方案,没有产生累积疼痛评分。本研究表明,在第三磨牙模型中,疼痛评分有显著改善,但由于大量的协议违反,需要进一步的研究来证明有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Review of Current Literature of Interest to the Office-Based Anesthesiologist. Anesthetic Management of a Patient With a Giant Hemangioma Who Required Urgent Embolization for Bleeding During Third Molar Extractions. Assessment of Ketamine's Influence on In Vitro Angiogenesis. Examining Liposomal Bupivacaine's Use in Dentistry. Experience of General Anesthesia for Glossopexy in Infants With Robin Sequence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1