Greater lesion damage is bidirectionally related with accelerated brain aging after stroke.

Mahir H Khan, Octavio Marin-Pardo, Stuti Chakraborty, Michael R Borich, Mayerly Castillo, James H Cole, Steven C Cramer, Miranda R Donnelly, Emily E Fokas, Niko H Fullmer, Jeanette R Gumarang, Leticia Hayes, Hosung Kim, Amisha Kumar, Emily A Marks, Emily R Rosario, Heidi M Schambra, Nicolas Schweighofer, Grace C Song, Myriam Taga, Bethany P Tavener, Carolee J Winstein, Sook-Lei Liew
{"title":"Greater lesion damage is bidirectionally related with accelerated brain aging after stroke.","authors":"Mahir H Khan, Octavio Marin-Pardo, Stuti Chakraborty, Michael R Borich, Mayerly Castillo, James H Cole, Steven C Cramer, Miranda R Donnelly, Emily E Fokas, Niko H Fullmer, Jeanette R Gumarang, Leticia Hayes, Hosung Kim, Amisha Kumar, Emily A Marks, Emily R Rosario, Heidi M Schambra, Nicolas Schweighofer, Grace C Song, Myriam Taga, Bethany P Tavener, Carolee J Winstein, Sook-Lei Liew","doi":"10.1101/2024.12.13.24319014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Regional neuron loss following stroke can result in remote brain changes due to diaschisis and secondary brain atrophy. Whole brain changes post-stroke can be captured by the predicted brain age difference (brain-PAD), a neuroimaging-derived biomarker of global brain health previously associated with poorer chronic stroke outcomes. We hypothesized that greater lesion damage would be longitudinally associated with worsening brain-PAD during subacute stroke, and conversely, that poorer baseline brain-PAD would be associated with enlarged lesion damage. We prospectively collected MRIs from 47 stroke patients across three sites within 3 weeks (baseline) and at 3 months (follow-up) post-stroke. Predicted brain age was estimated via a pretrained ridge regression model using 77 morphological features. Brain-PAD was calculated as predicted age minus chronological age. Robust linear mixed effects regression models were used to examine relationships between infarct volume and brain-PAD, adjusting for age, sex, time, and intracranial volume at baseline. Larger baseline infarct volume was associated with accelerated brain aging at 3 months (β=0.87, p=0.023). Conversely, larger baseline brain-PAD predicted larger increase in infarct volume at 3 months (β=0.02, p=0.009). These findings reveal a bidirectional relationship between focal stroke damage and global brain health during the subacute period, underscoring the importance of assessing both.</p>","PeriodicalId":94281,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11661443/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.12.13.24319014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Regional neuron loss following stroke can result in remote brain changes due to diaschisis and secondary brain atrophy. Whole brain changes post-stroke can be captured by the predicted brain age difference (brain-PAD), a neuroimaging-derived biomarker of global brain health previously associated with poorer chronic stroke outcomes. We hypothesized that greater lesion damage would be longitudinally associated with worsening brain-PAD during subacute stroke, and conversely, that poorer baseline brain-PAD would be associated with enlarged lesion damage. We prospectively collected MRIs from 47 stroke patients across three sites within 3 weeks (baseline) and at 3 months (follow-up) post-stroke. Predicted brain age was estimated via a pretrained ridge regression model using 77 morphological features. Brain-PAD was calculated as predicted age minus chronological age. Robust linear mixed effects regression models were used to examine relationships between infarct volume and brain-PAD, adjusting for age, sex, time, and intracranial volume at baseline. Larger baseline infarct volume was associated with accelerated brain aging at 3 months (β=0.87, p=0.023). Conversely, larger baseline brain-PAD predicted larger increase in infarct volume at 3 months (β=0.02, p=0.009). These findings reveal a bidirectional relationship between focal stroke damage and global brain health during the subacute period, underscoring the importance of assessing both.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脑卒中后更大的损伤与脑老化加速双向相关。
脑卒中后局部神经元损失可导致远端脑变化,原因是脑缺血和继发性脑萎缩。中风后的全脑变化可以通过预测的脑年龄差异(brain- pad)来捕捉,这是一种神经成像衍生的全球大脑健康生物标志物,以前与较差的慢性中风结果相关。我们假设在亚急性中风期间,更大的损伤与脑- pad恶化纵向相关,相反,更差的基线脑- pad与更大的损伤相关。我们前瞻性地收集了47名卒中患者在卒中后3周(基线)和3个月(随访)的三个部位的mri。预测脑年龄通过使用77个形态学特征的预训练脊回归模型估计。脑- pad计算为预测年龄减去实足年龄。采用稳健线性混合效应回归模型检验梗死体积与脑- pad之间的关系,调整年龄、性别、时间和基线时的颅内容积。基线梗死体积增大与3个月时脑老化加速相关(β=0.87, p=0.023)。相反,基线脑外pad越大,3个月时梗死体积增加越大(β=0.02, p=0.009)。这些发现揭示了亚急性期局灶性脑卒中损伤与整体脑健康之间的双向关系,强调了评估两者的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Should We Keep Changing the Clock? Characterizing Causal Effects of Daylight Saving Time on Behavior and Physiology. A norm-anchored structural deviation framework for characterizing cognitive heterogeneity in schizophrenia. Human RIG-I Antiviral Deficiency Caused by a Dominant-Negative Variant Locked in a Signaling-Inactive State. Immunotherapies for risk reduction in age-associated neurodegenerative diseases: impact of sex and treatment duration. Gene-Morphology Alignment via Graph-Constrained Latent Modeling for Molecular Subtype Prediction from Histopathology in Pancreatic Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1