Evaluation of strategies for evidence-driven genome annotation using long-read RNA-seq

IF 6.2 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Genome research Pub Date : 2024-12-23 DOI:10.1101/gr.279864.124
Alejandro Paniagua, Cristina Agustin-García, Francisco J Pardo-Palacios, Thomas Brown, Maite De Maria, Nancy D Denslow, Camila Mazzoni, Ana Conesa
{"title":"Evaluation of strategies for evidence-driven genome annotation using long-read RNA-seq","authors":"Alejandro Paniagua, Cristina Agustin-García, Francisco J Pardo-Palacios, Thomas Brown, Maite De Maria, Nancy D Denslow, Camila Mazzoni, Ana Conesa","doi":"10.1101/gr.279864.124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While the production of a draft genome has become more accessible due to long-read sequencing, the annotation of these new genomes has not been developed at the same pace. Long-read RNA sequencing (lrRNA-seq) offers a promising solution for enhancing gene annotation. In this study, we explore how sequencing platforms, Oxford Nanopore R9.4.1 chemistry or PacBio Sequel II CCS, and data processing methods influence evidence-driven genome annotation using long reads. Incorporating PacBio transcripts into our annotation pipeline significantly outperformed traditional methods, such as ab initio predictions and short-read-based annotations. We applied this strategy to a nonmodel species, the Florida manatee, and compared our results to existing short-read-based annotation. At the loci level, both annotations were highly concordant, with 90% agreement. However, at the transcript level, the agreement was only 35%. We identified 4,906 novel loci, represented by 5,707 isoforms, with 64% of these isoforms matching known sequences in other mammalian species. Overall, our findings underscore the importance of using high-quality curated transcript models in combination with ab initio methods for effective genome annotation.","PeriodicalId":12678,"journal":{"name":"Genome research","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genome research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.279864.124","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While the production of a draft genome has become more accessible due to long-read sequencing, the annotation of these new genomes has not been developed at the same pace. Long-read RNA sequencing (lrRNA-seq) offers a promising solution for enhancing gene annotation. In this study, we explore how sequencing platforms, Oxford Nanopore R9.4.1 chemistry or PacBio Sequel II CCS, and data processing methods influence evidence-driven genome annotation using long reads. Incorporating PacBio transcripts into our annotation pipeline significantly outperformed traditional methods, such as ab initio predictions and short-read-based annotations. We applied this strategy to a nonmodel species, the Florida manatee, and compared our results to existing short-read-based annotation. At the loci level, both annotations were highly concordant, with 90% agreement. However, at the transcript level, the agreement was only 35%. We identified 4,906 novel loci, represented by 5,707 isoforms, with 64% of these isoforms matching known sequences in other mammalian species. Overall, our findings underscore the importance of using high-quality curated transcript models in combination with ab initio methods for effective genome annotation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用长读RNA-seq评估证据驱动的基因组注释策略
虽然由于长读测序,草图基因组的制作变得更加容易,但这些新基因组的注释并没有以同样的速度发展。长读RNA测序(lrRNA-seq)为增强基因注释提供了一种很有前途的解决方案。在本研究中,我们探讨了测序平台、Oxford Nanopore R9.4.1化学或PacBio Sequel II CCS以及数据处理方法如何影响使用长读取的证据驱动基因组注释。将PacBio转录本整合到我们的注释管道中显著优于传统方法,例如从头开始预测和基于短读的注释。我们将这种策略应用于非模式物种佛罗里达海牛,并将我们的结果与现有的基于短读的注释进行比较。在位点水平上,两种注释高度一致,一致性达90%。然而,在成绩单水平上,一致性只有35%。我们鉴定了4906个新位点,由5707个同种异构体代表,其中64%的同种异构体与其他哺乳动物物种的已知序列相匹配。总的来说,我们的研究结果强调了将高质量的转录本模型与从头算方法相结合用于有效基因组注释的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Genome research
Genome research 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
1.40%
发文量
140
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Launched in 1995, Genome Research is an international, continuously published, peer-reviewed journal that focuses on research that provides novel insights into the genome biology of all organisms, including advances in genomic medicine. Among the topics considered by the journal are genome structure and function, comparative genomics, molecular evolution, genome-scale quantitative and population genetics, proteomics, epigenomics, and systems biology. The journal also features exciting gene discoveries and reports of cutting-edge computational biology and high-throughput methodologies. New data in these areas are published as research papers, or methods and resource reports that provide novel information on technologies or tools that will be of interest to a broad readership. Complete data sets are presented electronically on the journal''s web site where appropriate. The journal also provides Reviews, Perspectives, and Insight/Outlook articles, which present commentary on the latest advances published both here and elsewhere, placing such progress in its broader biological context.
期刊最新文献
Diffusion-based generation of gene regulatory networks from scRNA-seq data with DigNet. Kernel-bounded clustering for spatial transcriptomics enables scalable discovery of complex spatial domains The additional diagnostic yield of long-read sequencing in undiagnosed rare diseases k-mer approaches for biodiversity genomics Enhancing nanopore adaptive sampling for PromethION using readfish at scale
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1