Robust Automated Truncation Point Selection for Molecular Simulations.

IF 5.5 1区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation Pub Date : 2025-01-14 Epub Date: 2024-12-23 DOI:10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01359
Finlay Clark, Daniel J Cole, Julien Michel
{"title":"Robust Automated Truncation Point Selection for Molecular Simulations.","authors":"Finlay Clark, Daniel J Cole, Julien Michel","doi":"10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Quantities calculated from molecular simulations are often subject to an initial bias due to unrepresentative starting configurations. Initial data are usually discarded to reduce bias. Chodera's method for automated truncation point selection [J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2016, 12, 4, 1799-1805] is popular but has not been thoroughly assessed. We reformulate White's marginal standard error rule to provide a spectrum of truncation point selection heuristics that differ in their treatment of autocorrelation. These include a method effectively equivalent to Chodera's. We test these methods on ensembles of synthetic time series modeled on free energy change estimates from long absolute binding free energy calculations. Methods that more thoroughly account for autocorrelation often show late and variable truncation times, while methods that less thoroughly account for autocorrelation often show early truncation, relative to the optimal truncation point. This increases variance and bias, respectively. We recommend a method that achieves robust performance across our test sets by balancing these two extremes. None of the methods reliably detected insufficient sampling. All heuristics tested are implemented in the open-source Python package RED (github.com/fjclark/red).</p>","PeriodicalId":45,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation","volume":" ","pages":"88-101"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11736681/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01359","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Quantities calculated from molecular simulations are often subject to an initial bias due to unrepresentative starting configurations. Initial data are usually discarded to reduce bias. Chodera's method for automated truncation point selection [J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2016, 12, 4, 1799-1805] is popular but has not been thoroughly assessed. We reformulate White's marginal standard error rule to provide a spectrum of truncation point selection heuristics that differ in their treatment of autocorrelation. These include a method effectively equivalent to Chodera's. We test these methods on ensembles of synthetic time series modeled on free energy change estimates from long absolute binding free energy calculations. Methods that more thoroughly account for autocorrelation often show late and variable truncation times, while methods that less thoroughly account for autocorrelation often show early truncation, relative to the optimal truncation point. This increases variance and bias, respectively. We recommend a method that achieves robust performance across our test sets by balancing these two extremes. None of the methods reliably detected insufficient sampling. All heuristics tested are implemented in the open-source Python package RED (github.com/fjclark/red).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分子模拟鲁棒自动截断点选择。
由分子模拟计算出的数量往往由于不具代表性的起始构型而受到初始偏差的影响。初始数据通常被丢弃以减少偏差。基于Chodera的截断点自动选择方法[J]。化学。理论计算,2016,12,4,1799-1805]是流行的,但尚未被彻底评估。我们重新制定了怀特的边际标准误差规则,以提供截断点选择启发式的频谱,这些启发式在处理自相关方面有所不同。其中包括一种与乔德拉的方法等效的方法。我们在合成时间序列的集合上测试了这些方法,这些时间序列以长绝对束缚自由能计算的自由能变化估计为模型。更彻底地考虑自相关的方法通常显示较晚和可变的截断时间,而不太彻底地考虑自相关的方法通常显示相对于最佳截断点的较早截断。这分别增加了方差和偏差。我们推荐一种方法,通过平衡这两个极端,在我们的测试集中实现健壮的性能。没有一种方法可靠地检测到采样不足。所有测试的启发式方法都在开源Python包RED (github.com/fjclark/red)中实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 化学-物理:原子、分子和化学物理
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
16.40%
发文量
568
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation invites new and original contributions with the understanding that, if accepted, they will not be published elsewhere. Papers reporting new theories, methodology, and/or important applications in quantum electronic structure, molecular dynamics, and statistical mechanics are appropriate for submission to this Journal. Specific topics include advances in or applications of ab initio quantum mechanics, density functional theory, design and properties of new materials, surface science, Monte Carlo simulations, solvation models, QM/MM calculations, biomolecular structure prediction, and molecular dynamics in the broadest sense including gas-phase dynamics, ab initio dynamics, biomolecular dynamics, and protein folding. The Journal does not consider papers that are straightforward applications of known methods including DFT and molecular dynamics. The Journal favors submissions that include advances in theory or methodology with applications to compelling problems.
期刊最新文献
Comprehensive Comparison of Molecular Fragmentation Schemes for Proteins. Nuclear Quantum Effects on the Equation of State of Water: Insights from the Potential Energy Landscape Formalism. An Algorithm for Atom-Centered Lossy Compression of the Atomic Orbital Basis in Density Functional Theory Calculations. Fundamental Study of Density Functional Theory Applied to Triplet State Reactivity: Introduction of the TRIP50 Data Set. ReVesicle: Curation and Equilibration of Lipid Vesicles for Mesoscale Simulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1