Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Small and Very Small Aortic Valve Annuli: A Propensity-Matched Analysis Between Self-Expanding Versus Balloon-Expandable Valves
Tamar Itach, Itamar Loewenstein, David Zahler, Ariel Finkelstein, Israel Barbash, Gabby Elbaz Greener, Hana Assa-Vaknin, Ran Kornowski, Anna Turyan, Arie Steinvil
{"title":"Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Small and Very Small Aortic Valve Annuli: A Propensity-Matched Analysis Between Self-Expanding Versus Balloon-Expandable Valves","authors":"Tamar Itach, Itamar Loewenstein, David Zahler, Ariel Finkelstein, Israel Barbash, Gabby Elbaz Greener, Hana Assa-Vaknin, Ran Kornowski, Anna Turyan, Arie Steinvil","doi":"10.1002/ccd.31374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The management of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) patients with a small aortic annulus (SAA) postures a substantial challenge, increasing the risk of patient- prosthesis mismatch (PPM) and overall mortality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to compare the hemodynamic and clinical outcomes of transcatheter balloon-expandable valve (BEV) versus transcatheter self-expandable valve (SEV) in SAA.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted propensity score matching (PSM) of severe AS patients with SAA who underwent trans-femoral TAVR and enrolled to the Israeli TAVR registry between the years 2008 and 2023. SAA was defined as an aortic-valve annulus area ≤ 430 mm<sup>2</sup>. Since the BEV used have a smaller size cut-off, an additional analysis on very small aortic annulus (vSAA) as defined as aortic-valve annulus area ≤ 345 mm<sup>2</sup> was performed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The study included 1364 consecutive patients with SAA of (BEV <i>n</i> = 485; SEV <i>n </i>= 879) at a mean age of 82 ± 7 years, of whom the vast majority were female (83%). Propensity-matched groups comprised of 329 and 122 paired for the SAA and vSAA patients, respectively. As compared to BEV in the SAA and vSAA analyses, SEV showed lower rates of postprocedural of LBBB (32% vs. 22% and 41% vs. 22%; both <i>p</i> < 0.01, respectively), however, higher rates of major vascular complications (2% vs. 7% and 2% vs. 12%; both <i>p</i> < 0.01, respectively) and major or life-threatening bleeding but only in vSAA group (17% vs. 9.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.009). One-month mortality was higher in the SEV versus BEV in both SAA and vSAA comparisons (2% vs. 0.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.048 and 3% vs. 0%, <i>p</i> = 0.018; respectively). A nonsignificant trend of higher 5-year mortality was observed in univariate models, noted mainly in vSAA patients (22% vs. 19%, <i>p</i> = 0.385; 24% vs. 15%, <i>p</i> = 0.073).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The present analysis observed higher rates of major vascular complications and 1-month mortality in SAA and vSAA treated with SEV. A similar nonsignificant trend toward long-term mortality for the vSAA group was observed and should be evaluated in larger cohorts.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9650,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":"105 3","pages":"624-632"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ccd.31374","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
The management of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) patients with a small aortic annulus (SAA) postures a substantial challenge, increasing the risk of patient- prosthesis mismatch (PPM) and overall mortality.
Aims
This study aimed to compare the hemodynamic and clinical outcomes of transcatheter balloon-expandable valve (BEV) versus transcatheter self-expandable valve (SEV) in SAA.
Methods
We conducted propensity score matching (PSM) of severe AS patients with SAA who underwent trans-femoral TAVR and enrolled to the Israeli TAVR registry between the years 2008 and 2023. SAA was defined as an aortic-valve annulus area ≤ 430 mm2. Since the BEV used have a smaller size cut-off, an additional analysis on very small aortic annulus (vSAA) as defined as aortic-valve annulus area ≤ 345 mm2 was performed.
Results
The study included 1364 consecutive patients with SAA of (BEV n = 485; SEV n = 879) at a mean age of 82 ± 7 years, of whom the vast majority were female (83%). Propensity-matched groups comprised of 329 and 122 paired for the SAA and vSAA patients, respectively. As compared to BEV in the SAA and vSAA analyses, SEV showed lower rates of postprocedural of LBBB (32% vs. 22% and 41% vs. 22%; both p < 0.01, respectively), however, higher rates of major vascular complications (2% vs. 7% and 2% vs. 12%; both p < 0.01, respectively) and major or life-threatening bleeding but only in vSAA group (17% vs. 9.1%, p = 0.009). One-month mortality was higher in the SEV versus BEV in both SAA and vSAA comparisons (2% vs. 0.6%, p = 0.048 and 3% vs. 0%, p = 0.018; respectively). A nonsignificant trend of higher 5-year mortality was observed in univariate models, noted mainly in vSAA patients (22% vs. 19%, p = 0.385; 24% vs. 15%, p = 0.073).
Conclusions
The present analysis observed higher rates of major vascular complications and 1-month mortality in SAA and vSAA treated with SEV. A similar nonsignificant trend toward long-term mortality for the vSAA group was observed and should be evaluated in larger cohorts.
背景:经导管主动脉瓣置入术(TAVI)小主动脉环(SAA)患者的处理面临着巨大的挑战,增加了患者-假体不匹配(PPM)和总体死亡率的风险。目的:本研究旨在比较经导管球囊膨胀性瓣膜(BEV)与经导管自膨胀性瓣膜(SEV)在SAA中的血流动力学和临床结果。方法:我们对2008年至2023年间在以色列TAVR登记的接受经股动脉TAVR的严重AS合并SAA患者进行倾向评分匹配(PSM)。SAA定义为主动脉瓣环面积≤430 mm2。由于所使用的BEV具有较小的截止尺寸,因此对非常小的主动脉环(vSAA)进行了额外的分析,定义为主动脉瓣环面积≤345 mm2。结果:该研究纳入了1364例连续SAA患者(BEV n = 485;SEV n = 879),平均年龄82±7岁,其中绝大多数为女性(83%)。倾向匹配组分别由329对SAA和122对vSAA患者组成。在SAA和vSAA分析中,与BEV相比,SEV显示手术后LBBB的发生率较低(32%对22%,41%对22%;结论:本分析观察到SEV治疗SAA和vSAA的主要血管并发症发生率和1个月死亡率更高。观察到vSAA组的长期死亡率也有类似的不显著趋势,应该在更大的队列中进行评估。
期刊介绍:
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions is an international journal covering the broad field of cardiovascular diseases. Subject material includes basic and clinical information that is derived from or related to invasive and interventional coronary or peripheral vascular techniques. The journal focuses on material that will be of immediate practical value to physicians providing patient care in the clinical laboratory setting. To accomplish this, the journal publishes Preliminary Reports and Work In Progress articles that complement the traditional Original Studies, Case Reports, and Comprehensive Reviews. Perspective and insight concerning controversial subjects and evolving technologies are provided regularly through Editorial Commentaries furnished by members of the Editorial Board and other experts. Articles are subject to double-blind peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability.