Retrospective Analysis of Sacubitril/Valsartan vs Benazepril for Treating Heart Failure Following Acute Myocardial Infarction.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL International Journal of General Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-19 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/IJGM.S496996
Li Zhao, Yuanyuan Ren, Donghui Qin, Xue Yang, Zhuo Chen, Na Zhang
{"title":"Retrospective Analysis of Sacubitril/Valsartan vs Benazepril for Treating Heart Failure Following Acute Myocardial Infarction.","authors":"Li Zhao, Yuanyuan Ren, Donghui Qin, Xue Yang, Zhuo Chen, Na Zhang","doi":"10.2147/IJGM.S496996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To retrospectively compare the efficacy of Sacubitril/Valsartan and Benazepril in the treatment of heart failure in patients following acute myocardial infarction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of clinical data was conducted for 103 patients with heart failure following acute myocardial infarction admitted to our hospital from January 2021 to January 2024. All patients met complete inclusion and exclusion criteria. Based on the treatment interventions received, they were divided into a control group (n=51) and an observation group (n=52). All patients received percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and conventional drug treatment upon admission. The control group received additional treatment with benazepril, while the observation group received Sacubitril/Valsartan on top of the baseline treatment. A comparison was made between the two groups in terms of clinical treatment outcomes, cardiac function indicators [left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDD), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)], levels of inflammatory markers [high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6)], N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), incidence of adverse reactions, major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), and 6-minute walking distance (6MWD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No patients were lost to follow-up. After six months of treatment, the observation group demonstrated significantly greater improvements in left ventricular function parameters (LVESV, LVEDD, and LVEF) and reductions in inflammatory markers (hs-CRP, IL-6) and NT-proBNP levels compared to the control group (P < 0.05). The observation group also had a significantly lower incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) (11.54% vs 31.37%, P < 0.05) and a greater improvement in 6-minute walking distance (P < 0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions was comparable between the two groups (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sacubitril/Valsartan is a safe and effective treatment for heart failure post-AMI, offering significant improvements in cardiac function, inflammatory response, exercise capacity, and a reduction in MACE risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":14131,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of General Medicine","volume":"17 ","pages":"6367-6376"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11665437/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of General Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S496996","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To retrospectively compare the efficacy of Sacubitril/Valsartan and Benazepril in the treatment of heart failure in patients following acute myocardial infarction.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of clinical data was conducted for 103 patients with heart failure following acute myocardial infarction admitted to our hospital from January 2021 to January 2024. All patients met complete inclusion and exclusion criteria. Based on the treatment interventions received, they were divided into a control group (n=51) and an observation group (n=52). All patients received percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and conventional drug treatment upon admission. The control group received additional treatment with benazepril, while the observation group received Sacubitril/Valsartan on top of the baseline treatment. A comparison was made between the two groups in terms of clinical treatment outcomes, cardiac function indicators [left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDD), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)], levels of inflammatory markers [high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6)], N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), incidence of adverse reactions, major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), and 6-minute walking distance (6MWD).

Results: No patients were lost to follow-up. After six months of treatment, the observation group demonstrated significantly greater improvements in left ventricular function parameters (LVESV, LVEDD, and LVEF) and reductions in inflammatory markers (hs-CRP, IL-6) and NT-proBNP levels compared to the control group (P < 0.05). The observation group also had a significantly lower incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) (11.54% vs 31.37%, P < 0.05) and a greater improvement in 6-minute walking distance (P < 0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions was comparable between the two groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: Sacubitril/Valsartan is a safe and effective treatment for heart failure post-AMI, offering significant improvements in cardiac function, inflammatory response, exercise capacity, and a reduction in MACE risk.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沙比利/缬沙坦与贝那普利治疗急性心肌梗死后心力衰竭的回顾性分析。
目的:回顾性比较苏比里尔/缬沙坦与贝那普利治疗急性心肌梗死后心力衰竭的疗效。方法:回顾性分析我院2021年1月至2024年1月收治的103例急性心肌梗死后心力衰竭患者的临床资料。所有患者完全符合纳入和排除标准。根据所接受的治疗干预措施分为对照组(n=51)和观察组(n=52)。所有患者入院时均接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)及常规药物治疗。对照组在基础治疗的基础上加用贝那普利,观察组在基础治疗的基础上加用苏比里尔/缬沙坦。比较两组患者的临床治疗结果、心功能指标[左室收缩末容积(LVESV)、左室舒张末容积(LVEDD)、左室射血分数(LVEF)]、炎症标志物[高敏c反应蛋白(hs-CRP)、白细胞介素-6 (IL-6)]、n端前b型利钠肽(NT-proBNP)水平、不良反应发生率、主要心脏不良事件(mace)、6分钟步行距离(6MWD)。结果:无患者失访。治疗6个月后,观察组左心室功能参数(LVESV、LVEDD、LVEF)改善显著,炎症标志物(hs-CRP、IL-6)、NT-proBNP水平降低显著(P < 0.05)。观察组患者主要心脏不良事件(mace)发生率(11.54% vs 31.37%, P < 0.05)显著降低(P < 0.05), 6分钟步行距离(P < 0.05)明显改善(P < 0.05)。两组不良反应发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:Sacubitril/缬沙坦是一种安全有效的治疗ami后心力衰竭的方法,可显著改善心功能、炎症反应、运动能力,降低MACE风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of General Medicine
International Journal of General Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1113
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of General Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that focuses on general and internal medicine, pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnosis, monitoring and treatment protocols. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research and clinical studies across all disease areas. A key focus of the journal is the elucidation of disease processes and management protocols resulting in improved outcomes for the patient. Patient perspectives such as satisfaction, quality of life, health literacy and communication and their role in developing new healthcare programs and optimizing clinical outcomes are major areas of interest for the journal. As of 1st April 2019, the International Journal of General Medicine will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
期刊最新文献
AI-Assisted Compressed Sensing Enables Faster Brain MRI for the Elderly: Image Quality and Diagnostic Equivalence with Conventional Imaging. Diagnostic Value of Measurements of Median Nerve Diameter at the Site of the Maximal Stenosis in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Lesion Location and Possible Etiology of Acute Unilateral Vestibulopathy. Study of Radioclinical and Risk Factors of Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: A Retrospective Analysis of Patients Presenting to a Tertiary Hospital in Mogadishu, Somalia. Correlation Between Inflammatory Markers and Pathogenic Bacteria in Children's Winter Respiratory Infections in Xinjiang.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1