Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) for Recovery in Mental Health: A Scoping Review.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Community Mental Health Journal Pub Date : 2024-12-24 DOI:10.1007/s10597-024-01426-9
José A Garrido-Cervera, María I Ruiz-Granados, Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas, Antonio J Sánchez-Guarnido
{"title":"Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) for Recovery in Mental Health: A Scoping Review.","authors":"José A Garrido-Cervera, María I Ruiz-Granados, Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas, Antonio J Sánchez-Guarnido","doi":"10.1007/s10597-024-01426-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recovery is a holistic approach to mental health care which focusses on the ability of people with mental disorders to achieve their goals and live full, meaningful lives despite their limitations. Recovery assessment tools are instruments that make it possible to measure the progress of people with mental disorders on their path to recovery. To explore, map and describe patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) found in the literature related to the recovery process in people with mental disorders (MDs). A scoping review was carried out of papers proposing personal recovery assessment tools. The search was performed in seven data bases: SCOPUS, CINAHL, Medline, Web of Science, Teseo, Opengrey and Dart-Europe. It included studies published between 1970 and 2023 with adult participants suffering from some form of MD. It excluded studies involving patients with intellectual disability and/or addictions. 82% of the instruments described in the 50 studies found used self-administered questionnaires. The most frequently referenced dimensions were hope, empowerment and wellbeing, with an average of 35 items per questionnaire. The most frequently assessed psychometric property was internal consistency, which was evaluated in 84% of the studies. Recovery is a complex concept which is not integrally measured in any of the existing scales. However, the tools identified in the review can help mental health professionals assess the recovery of MD patients and develop personalised treatment plans.</p>","PeriodicalId":10654,"journal":{"name":"Community Mental Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community Mental Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-024-01426-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recovery is a holistic approach to mental health care which focusses on the ability of people with mental disorders to achieve their goals and live full, meaningful lives despite their limitations. Recovery assessment tools are instruments that make it possible to measure the progress of people with mental disorders on their path to recovery. To explore, map and describe patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) found in the literature related to the recovery process in people with mental disorders (MDs). A scoping review was carried out of papers proposing personal recovery assessment tools. The search was performed in seven data bases: SCOPUS, CINAHL, Medline, Web of Science, Teseo, Opengrey and Dart-Europe. It included studies published between 1970 and 2023 with adult participants suffering from some form of MD. It excluded studies involving patients with intellectual disability and/or addictions. 82% of the instruments described in the 50 studies found used self-administered questionnaires. The most frequently referenced dimensions were hope, empowerment and wellbeing, with an average of 35 items per questionnaire. The most frequently assessed psychometric property was internal consistency, which was evaluated in 84% of the studies. Recovery is a complex concept which is not integrally measured in any of the existing scales. However, the tools identified in the review can help mental health professionals assess the recovery of MD patients and develop personalised treatment plans.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: Community Mental Health Journal focuses on the needs of people experiencing serious forms of psychological distress, as well as the structures established to address those needs. Areas of particular interest include critical examination of current paradigms of diagnosis and treatment, socio-structural determinants of mental health, social hierarchies within the public mental health systems, and the intersection of public mental health programs and social/racial justice and health equity. While this is the journal of the American Association for Community Psychiatry, we welcome manuscripts reflecting research from a range of disciplines on recovery-oriented services, public health policy, clinical delivery systems, advocacy, and emerging and innovative practices.
期刊最新文献
Correction: Attitudes of Health and Mental Health Professionals, and Police Staff towards Mentally Ill Offenders in Greece. Clubhouse Partnerships with Clinical Services: Current Status and Barriers to Integration. Acute Needs, ACUTE Response: Development and Delivery of a Mental Health Urgent Care in the Bronx. Enhancing Equity on Crisis Lines: Understanding the Background, Practices and Learning Needs of Responders in Canada. Supporting the Individualized Use of Digital Tools in Community Mental Health: The Technology Specialist Pilot Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1