Impact of the Individual Operator Experience and Learning Curve of a Novel Size Adjustable Cryoballoon

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology Pub Date : 2024-12-23 DOI:10.1111/jce.16526
Yosuke Hayashi, Shinsuke Miyazaki, Junichi Nitta, Osamu Inaba, Yuichiro Sagawa, Shinsuke Iwai, Yukio Sekiguchi, Yukihiro Inamura, Yasuteru Yamauchi, Kentaro Goto, Takuro Nishimura, Tetsuo Sasano
{"title":"Impact of the Individual Operator Experience and Learning Curve of a Novel Size Adjustable Cryoballoon","authors":"Yosuke Hayashi,&nbsp;Shinsuke Miyazaki,&nbsp;Junichi Nitta,&nbsp;Osamu Inaba,&nbsp;Yuichiro Sagawa,&nbsp;Shinsuke Iwai,&nbsp;Yukio Sekiguchi,&nbsp;Yukihiro Inamura,&nbsp;Yasuteru Yamauchi,&nbsp;Kentaro Goto,&nbsp;Takuro Nishimura,&nbsp;Tetsuo Sasano","doi":"10.1111/jce.16526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Cryoballoon ablation is less operator-dependent than radiofrequency ablation. Recently, size-adjustable cryoballoons (SA-CBs) have become available. We sought to analyze the individual baseline operator experience's impact on procedural results.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This multicenter observational study included atrial fibrillation (AF) patients who underwent pulmonary vein (PV) isolation using SA-CBs capable of 28-mm or 31-mm balloon sizes. Experienced (E-group) or less experienced (LE-group) operators were defined as experiencing &gt; 100 or ≤ 100 cryoballoon procedures, respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among 510 patients (67 ± 11 years, 355 men, 325 paroxysmal AF [PAF]) who underwent an SA-CB ablation, 240 and 270 were in the E-group and LE-group, respectively. All cryoballoon parameters were similar between the groups, except for a significantly higher 31-mm balloon isolation rate in the E-group than LE-group, especially for right superior PVs. Cryoballoon-related phrenic nerve injury occurred in 34 (6.7%) patients and tended to be higher in the LE-group than E-group (8.1% vs. 5.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.16). The AF freedom was comparable between the groups for both PAF and non-PAF patients. A total of 36(7.1%) patients underwent re-do procedures at 5.2 ± 2.6 months post-index procedure. The PV reconnection rate was significantly higher in the LE-group than E-group (27.1% vs. 8.9%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01), and this trend was more pronounced for right PVs than left PVs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>In AF ablation using SA-CBs, the overall procedural efficacy and safety were comparable between the E-group and LE-group. However, 100 CB procedures seemed to still be in the middle of a learning curve for selecting the balloon size and balloon position, especially for right PVs.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15178,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","volume":"36 2","pages":"422-429"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jce.16526","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Cryoballoon ablation is less operator-dependent than radiofrequency ablation. Recently, size-adjustable cryoballoons (SA-CBs) have become available. We sought to analyze the individual baseline operator experience's impact on procedural results.

Methods

This multicenter observational study included atrial fibrillation (AF) patients who underwent pulmonary vein (PV) isolation using SA-CBs capable of 28-mm or 31-mm balloon sizes. Experienced (E-group) or less experienced (LE-group) operators were defined as experiencing > 100 or ≤ 100 cryoballoon procedures, respectively.

Results

Among 510 patients (67 ± 11 years, 355 men, 325 paroxysmal AF [PAF]) who underwent an SA-CB ablation, 240 and 270 were in the E-group and LE-group, respectively. All cryoballoon parameters were similar between the groups, except for a significantly higher 31-mm balloon isolation rate in the E-group than LE-group, especially for right superior PVs. Cryoballoon-related phrenic nerve injury occurred in 34 (6.7%) patients and tended to be higher in the LE-group than E-group (8.1% vs. 5.0%, p = 0.16). The AF freedom was comparable between the groups for both PAF and non-PAF patients. A total of 36(7.1%) patients underwent re-do procedures at 5.2 ± 2.6 months post-index procedure. The PV reconnection rate was significantly higher in the LE-group than E-group (27.1% vs. 8.9%, p < 0.01), and this trend was more pronounced for right PVs than left PVs.

Conclusions

In AF ablation using SA-CBs, the overall procedural efficacy and safety were comparable between the E-group and LE-group. However, 100 CB procedures seemed to still be in the middle of a learning curve for selecting the balloon size and balloon position, especially for right PVs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种新型尺寸可调低温气球的个人操作经验和学习曲线的影响。
背景:低温球囊消融比射频消融对操作者的依赖性更小。最近,尺寸可调节的低温气球(SA-CBs)已经可用。我们试图分析单个基线操作员经验对程序结果的影响。方法:这项多中心观察性研究纳入了房颤(AF)患者,这些患者使用28毫米或31毫米球囊大小的SA-CBs进行肺静脉(PV)隔离。经验丰富(e组)或经验不足(le组)的操作人员分别被定义为经历了100次或≤100次冷冻球囊手术。结果:接受SA-CB消融的510例患者(67±11岁,男性355例,阵发性房颤[PAF] 325例)中,e组240例,le组270例。除了e组的31-mm球囊分离率显著高于le组外,各组间的所有低温球囊参数相似,尤其是右上PVs。低温球囊相关性膈神经损伤34例(6.7%),其中le组发生率高于e组(8.1% vs. 5.0%, p = 0.16)。PAF和非PAF患者的房颤自由度在两组之间具有可比性。36例(7.1%)患者在指数手术后5.2±2.6个月再次接受手术。le组的PV重连率明显高于e组(27.1% vs. 8.9%), p结论:在使用SA-CBs的房颤消融中,e组和le组的总体手术疗效和安全性相当。然而,100 CB程序似乎仍然在学习曲线的中间选择气球的大小和气球的位置,特别是对正确的pv。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
14.80%
发文量
433
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (JCE) keeps its readership well informed of the latest developments in the study and management of arrhythmic disorders. Edited by Bradley P. Knight, M.D., and a distinguished international editorial board, JCE is the leading journal devoted to the study of the electrophysiology of the heart.
期刊最新文献
Response to the Letter to the Editor "How to Manage Ventricular Arrhythmia Following Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation". Catheter Ablation Improves Ventilatory Efficiency in Atrial Fibrillation-Mediated Cardiomyopathy. Impact of Tricuspid Regurgitation on Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence After Pulmonary Vein Isolation. Presence of Ineffective Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Pacing Provides Insights Into Hidden Causes and Therapeutic Targets of Nonresponder. Response to Letter to the Editor Concerning the Article "Ablation of Premature Ventricular Contractions with Prepotentials Mapped Inside Coronary Cusps: When to Go Infra-Valvular?"
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1