Perioperative Geriatrician Assessment Is Associated with a Lower Risk of Emergency Department Visits After Total Joint Arthroplasty.

IF 4.3 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume Pub Date : 2025-02-19 Epub Date: 2024-12-23 DOI:10.2106/JBJS.23.01157
Adriana P Liimakka, Alexander R Farid, Lillian Zhu, Patrick J Monette, Nathan H Varady, Jeffrey K Lange, Houman Javedan, Antonia F Chen
{"title":"Perioperative Geriatrician Assessment Is Associated with a Lower Risk of Emergency Department Visits After Total Joint Arthroplasty.","authors":"Adriana P Liimakka, Alexander R Farid, Lillian Zhu, Patrick J Monette, Nathan H Varady, Jeffrey K Lange, Houman Javedan, Antonia F Chen","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.23.01157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous research has underscored the benefits of geriatrician consultation in improving outcomes for older patients undergoing hip fracture repair, highlighting enhanced functional outcomes and reduced morbidity. However, the impact of geriatrician care in outcomes for patients undergoing elective total joint arthroplasty (TJA) has yet to be described. We aimed to determine whether preoperative or postoperative geriatrician involvement was associated with differences in the length of hospital stay and emergency department (ED) visits after TJA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study screened the medical records of patients ≥65 years of age undergoing primary elective TJA in a network of tertiary hospitals. Geriatrician consultations occurring within a period spanning 90 days before to 90 days after TJA were recorded. Bivariate analysis and multivariable regression models were used to assess the relationship between receiving these consultations and changes in the length of stay and ED visits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 16,076 patients undergoing primary TJA were included. Of these surgical procedures, 9,677 (60.2%) were total knee arthroplasties and 6,087 (37.9%) were total hip arthroplasties; 1,416 (8.8%) of cases had geriatrician visits. Patients had lower odds of requiring postoperative ED visits when they had at least 1 geriatrician appointment within the week preceding an arthroplasty (odds ratio [OR], 0.97 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.68 to 0.99]; p = 0.005). This effect was most notable for 65-year-old patients (OR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.45 to 0.98]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study reports promising evidence supporting the benefits of perioperative geriatrician visits on TJA outcomes. Preoperative visits were shown to be associated with decreased odds of ED visits after TJA in patients for up to 90 days postoperatively. Thus, geriatrician involvement in elective TJAs has the potential to improve outcomes and reduce morbidity and costs for patients and reduce costs for surgeons and institutions.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":"372-380"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.23.01157","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Previous research has underscored the benefits of geriatrician consultation in improving outcomes for older patients undergoing hip fracture repair, highlighting enhanced functional outcomes and reduced morbidity. However, the impact of geriatrician care in outcomes for patients undergoing elective total joint arthroplasty (TJA) has yet to be described. We aimed to determine whether preoperative or postoperative geriatrician involvement was associated with differences in the length of hospital stay and emergency department (ED) visits after TJA.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study screened the medical records of patients ≥65 years of age undergoing primary elective TJA in a network of tertiary hospitals. Geriatrician consultations occurring within a period spanning 90 days before to 90 days after TJA were recorded. Bivariate analysis and multivariable regression models were used to assess the relationship between receiving these consultations and changes in the length of stay and ED visits.

Results: A total of 16,076 patients undergoing primary TJA were included. Of these surgical procedures, 9,677 (60.2%) were total knee arthroplasties and 6,087 (37.9%) were total hip arthroplasties; 1,416 (8.8%) of cases had geriatrician visits. Patients had lower odds of requiring postoperative ED visits when they had at least 1 geriatrician appointment within the week preceding an arthroplasty (odds ratio [OR], 0.97 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.68 to 0.99]; p = 0.005). This effect was most notable for 65-year-old patients (OR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.45 to 0.98]).

Conclusion: This study reports promising evidence supporting the benefits of perioperative geriatrician visits on TJA outcomes. Preoperative visits were shown to be associated with decreased odds of ED visits after TJA in patients for up to 90 days postoperatively. Thus, geriatrician involvement in elective TJAs has the potential to improve outcomes and reduce morbidity and costs for patients and reduce costs for surgeons and institutions.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
围手术期老年专家评估与全关节置换术后急诊就诊风险降低相关
背景:先前的研究强调了老年专家咨询在改善髋部骨折修复的老年患者预后方面的益处,强调了增强的功能预后和降低的发病率。然而,老年人护理对选择性全关节置换术(TJA)患者预后的影响尚未得到描述。我们的目的是确定术前或术后老年医生参与是否与TJA后住院时间和急诊时间(ED)的差异有关。方法:本回顾性队列研究筛选了三级医院网络中年龄≥65岁的初级选择性TJA患者的医疗记录。记录了在TJA之前90天至之后90天内进行的老年病专家咨询。使用双变量分析和多变量回归模型来评估接受这些咨询与住院时间和急诊科就诊时间变化之间的关系。结果:共纳入16076例原发性TJA患者。在这些手术中,9677例(60.2%)为全膝关节置换术,6087例(37.9%)为全髋关节置换术;1416例(8.8%)病例就诊于老年科医生。如果患者在关节置换术前一周内至少有1次老年病医生预约,则患者术后需要急诊科就诊的几率较低(优势比[OR], 0.97[95%可信区间(CI), 0.68至0.99];P = 0.005)。这种效应在65岁的患者中最为显著(OR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.45 ~ 0.98])。结论:本研究报告了有希望的证据,支持围手术期就诊对TJA预后的益处。术前就诊与TJA术后90天内患者ED就诊几率降低相关。因此,老年医生参与选择性TJAs有可能改善结果,降低患者的发病率和成本,降低外科医生和机构的成本。证据等级:治疗性III级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
7.50%
发文量
660
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (JBJS) has been the most valued source of information for orthopaedic surgeons and researchers for over 125 years and is the gold standard in peer-reviewed scientific information in the field. A core journal and essential reading for general as well as specialist orthopaedic surgeons worldwide, The Journal publishes evidence-based research to enhance the quality of care for orthopaedic patients. Standards of excellence and high quality are maintained in everything we do, from the science of the content published to the customer service we provide. JBJS is an independent, non-profit journal.
期刊最新文献
A Blinded Analysis of Quality and Fidelity in Orthopaedic Patient Education Materials Simplified by ChatGPT and Humans. Mild Lateral Femoral Condyle Cartilage Damage Does Not Affect the Outcomes of Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Mean 6-Year Follow-up Study. Measuring Value in Orthopaedics: The U.S. and U.K. Perspectives. Cost-Effectiveness of Surgery Versus Functional Bracing for Humeral Shaft Fractures in Adults: A Prespecified Economic Evaluation of the Finnish Shaft of the Humerus (FISH) Trial. Radiographic Measurement of Psoas Muscle Width: A Simple and Reliable Screening Tool for Sarcopenia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1