Machine Learning-Driven Identification of Distinct Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Phenotypes: A Cluster Analysis of DECAAF II

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology Pub Date : 2024-12-23 DOI:10.1111/jce.16554
Charbel Noujaim, Han Feng, Ghassan Bidaoui, Chao Huang, Hadi Younes, Ala Assaf, Mario Mekhael, Nour Chouman, Chanho Lim, Eoin Donnellan, Ghaith Shamaileh, Abdel Hadi El Hajjar, Daniel Nelson, Aneesh Dhore, Dan Li, Nassir Marrouche, Omar Kreidieh
{"title":"Machine Learning-Driven Identification of Distinct Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Phenotypes: A Cluster Analysis of DECAAF II","authors":"Charbel Noujaim,&nbsp;Han Feng,&nbsp;Ghassan Bidaoui,&nbsp;Chao Huang,&nbsp;Hadi Younes,&nbsp;Ala Assaf,&nbsp;Mario Mekhael,&nbsp;Nour Chouman,&nbsp;Chanho Lim,&nbsp;Eoin Donnellan,&nbsp;Ghaith Shamaileh,&nbsp;Abdel Hadi El Hajjar,&nbsp;Daniel Nelson,&nbsp;Aneesh Dhore,&nbsp;Dan Li,&nbsp;Nassir Marrouche,&nbsp;Omar Kreidieh","doi":"10.1111/jce.16554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation yields sub-optimal success rates partly due to the considerable heterogeneity within the patient population. Identifying distinct patient phenotypes based on post-ablation prognosis could improve patient selection for additional therapies and optimize treatment strategies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We studied all patients who underwent catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation in the DECAAF II trial. Out of 44 participating centers, 25% were randomly chosen as a validation set. A Gradient Boosting Method determined essential features for arrhythmia recurrence prediction and the number of clusters was determined according to the average silhouette width. K-medoids cluster analysis identified subgroups based on these features, and Kaplan–Meier curves were further compared among different clusters.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among 815 patients, 570 served as a training set and 245 as a validation set. Using the training set, the GBM model achieved an AUC of 0.874. K-medoids cluster analysis used LA volume, BMI, baseline fibrosis, and age, resulting in two clusters. Cluster 1 patients were older, had higher baseline fibrosis, higher BMI, and greater LA volume compared to Cluster 2. Atrial arrhythmia recurrence rates were significantly higher in Cluster 1 (51.7% vs. 35.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.0002), and survival analysis showed a significant difference in primary recurrence outcomes (HR = 1.71, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). The validation set confirmed these findings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Utilizing machine learning, we identified a high-risk cluster for procedural failure in catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation within the DECAAF II trial population. The primary differentiating factors of this high-risk cluster include older age, high left atrial fibrosis, elevated BMI, and increased left atrial volume.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15178,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","volume":"36 2","pages":"457-466"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jce.16554","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation yields sub-optimal success rates partly due to the considerable heterogeneity within the patient population. Identifying distinct patient phenotypes based on post-ablation prognosis could improve patient selection for additional therapies and optimize treatment strategies.

Methods

We studied all patients who underwent catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation in the DECAAF II trial. Out of 44 participating centers, 25% were randomly chosen as a validation set. A Gradient Boosting Method determined essential features for arrhythmia recurrence prediction and the number of clusters was determined according to the average silhouette width. K-medoids cluster analysis identified subgroups based on these features, and Kaplan–Meier curves were further compared among different clusters.

Results

Among 815 patients, 570 served as a training set and 245 as a validation set. Using the training set, the GBM model achieved an AUC of 0.874. K-medoids cluster analysis used LA volume, BMI, baseline fibrosis, and age, resulting in two clusters. Cluster 1 patients were older, had higher baseline fibrosis, higher BMI, and greater LA volume compared to Cluster 2. Atrial arrhythmia recurrence rates were significantly higher in Cluster 1 (51.7% vs. 35.0%, p = 0.0002), and survival analysis showed a significant difference in primary recurrence outcomes (HR = 1.71, p < 0.0001). The validation set confirmed these findings.

Conclusion

Utilizing machine learning, we identified a high-risk cluster for procedural failure in catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation within the DECAAF II trial population. The primary differentiating factors of this high-risk cluster include older age, high left atrial fibrosis, elevated BMI, and increased left atrial volume.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器学习驱动识别不同的持续性心房颤动表型:DECAAF II的聚类分析。
导读:持续性心房颤动的导管消融产生了次优的成功率,部分原因是患者群体中存在相当大的异质性。根据消融后预后确定不同的患者表型可以改善患者对其他治疗方法的选择并优化治疗策略。方法:我们在DECAAF II试验中研究了所有接受导管消融治疗持续性心房颤动的患者。在44个参与中心中,随机选择25%作为验证集。梯度增强法确定预测心律失常复发的基本特征,并根据平均轮廓宽度确定聚类数量。k - medioids聚类分析根据这些特征确定亚群,并进一步比较不同聚类之间的Kaplan-Meier曲线。结果:在815例患者中,570例作为训练集,245例作为验证集。使用训练集,GBM模型的AUC为0.874。k - medidoids聚类分析使用LA体积、BMI、基线纤维化和年龄,结果为两个聚类。与第2类患者相比,第1类患者年龄较大,具有较高的基线纤维化,较高的BMI和更大的LA容量。聚类1的心房心律失常复发率明显较高(51.7% vs. 35.0%, p = 0.0002),生存分析显示原发性复发结局存在显著差异(HR = 1.71, p)。结论:利用机器学习,我们在DECAAF II试验人群中确定了持续性心房颤动导管消融手术失败的高危聚类。该高危群的主要鉴别因素包括年龄较大、左心房纤维化程度高、BMI升高和左心房容积增大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
14.80%
发文量
433
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (JCE) keeps its readership well informed of the latest developments in the study and management of arrhythmic disorders. Edited by Bradley P. Knight, M.D., and a distinguished international editorial board, JCE is the leading journal devoted to the study of the electrophysiology of the heart.
期刊最新文献
Response to the Letter to the Editor "How to Manage Ventricular Arrhythmia Following Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation". Catheter Ablation Improves Ventilatory Efficiency in Atrial Fibrillation-Mediated Cardiomyopathy. Impact of Tricuspid Regurgitation on Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence After Pulmonary Vein Isolation. Presence of Ineffective Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Pacing Provides Insights Into Hidden Causes and Therapeutic Targets of Nonresponder. Response to Letter to the Editor Concerning the Article "Ablation of Premature Ventricular Contractions with Prepotentials Mapped Inside Coronary Cusps: When to Go Infra-Valvular?"
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1