Guidance Documents for Off-Label Drug Use Management for Chinese Health Care Institutions: A Scoping Review

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-23 DOI:10.1111/jebm.12669
Changcheng Shi, Yingying Yang, Changling Wu, Limin Wang, Yehua Dong, Yajun Qi, Lingling Hu, Ling Chen, Qingyu Li, Qianqian Jiang, Nengming Lin, Gang Wang
{"title":"Guidance Documents for Off-Label Drug Use Management for Chinese Health Care Institutions: A Scoping Review","authors":"Changcheng Shi,&nbsp;Yingying Yang,&nbsp;Changling Wu,&nbsp;Limin Wang,&nbsp;Yehua Dong,&nbsp;Yajun Qi,&nbsp;Lingling Hu,&nbsp;Ling Chen,&nbsp;Qingyu Li,&nbsp;Qianqian Jiang,&nbsp;Nengming Lin,&nbsp;Gang Wang","doi":"10.1111/jebm.12669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Off-label drug use (OLDU) is a common practice in health care institutions, and numerous guidance documents have been developed to guide the management of OLDU in China. This scoping review aims to compare these documents and identify existing issues.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>PubMed, EMbase, three Chinese databases, the National Public Service Platform for Standards Information and the official websites of pharmaceutical-related associations were searched to identify guidance documents relevant to the management of OLDU for Chinese health care institutions. We extracted and compared the recommended practices for various aspects of OLDU management, including management systems, organizational structure, prerequisites for OLDU, approval processes, evidence-based evaluation, informed consent, and other related aspects.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 16 guidance documents were included, comprising 12 expert consensuses, 2 practice guidelines, and 2 group standards. Only six documents provide specific requirements for the establishment of management systems. Management of OLDU requires involvement from multiple departments or committees, yet only a few documents explicitly delineate the supervisory authority, and the responsibilities of the parties involved. These documents also show significant disparities in their approval process, evidence-based evaluation, and informed consent recommendations. Furthermore, only a minority of the documents provide specific requirements for training and assessments focused on OLDU and improving adverse reaction monitoring.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>These guidance documents differ significantly in their specific recommendations for the management of OLDU and lack sufficient emphasis on certain critical aspects. It may be beneficial for health administrative authorities to promote the development of unified national guidelines.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16090,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine","volume":"17 4","pages":"808-821"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jebm.12669","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Off-label drug use (OLDU) is a common practice in health care institutions, and numerous guidance documents have been developed to guide the management of OLDU in China. This scoping review aims to compare these documents and identify existing issues.

Methods

PubMed, EMbase, three Chinese databases, the National Public Service Platform for Standards Information and the official websites of pharmaceutical-related associations were searched to identify guidance documents relevant to the management of OLDU for Chinese health care institutions. We extracted and compared the recommended practices for various aspects of OLDU management, including management systems, organizational structure, prerequisites for OLDU, approval processes, evidence-based evaluation, informed consent, and other related aspects.

Results

A total of 16 guidance documents were included, comprising 12 expert consensuses, 2 practice guidelines, and 2 group standards. Only six documents provide specific requirements for the establishment of management systems. Management of OLDU requires involvement from multiple departments or committees, yet only a few documents explicitly delineate the supervisory authority, and the responsibilities of the parties involved. These documents also show significant disparities in their approval process, evidence-based evaluation, and informed consent recommendations. Furthermore, only a minority of the documents provide specific requirements for training and assessments focused on OLDU and improving adverse reaction monitoring.

Conclusion

These guidance documents differ significantly in their specific recommendations for the management of OLDU and lack sufficient emphasis on certain critical aspects. It may be beneficial for health administrative authorities to promote the development of unified national guidelines.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我国卫生保健机构超说明书用药管理指导文件:范围综述
背景:超说明书用药(Off-label drug usage,简称OLDU)是医疗机构的常见做法,中国已经制定了许多指导文件来指导超说明书用药的管理。此范围审查旨在比较这些文档并确定存在的问题。方法:检索PubMed、EMbase、3个中文数据库、国家标准信息公共服务平台和医药相关协会官方网站,筛选我国医疗卫生机构OLDU管理相关的指导性文件。我们提取并比较了OLDU管理各个方面的推荐实践,包括管理系统、组织结构、OLDU的先决条件、批准流程、循证评估、知情同意和其他相关方面。结果:共纳入16份指导性文件,其中专家共识12份,实践指南2份,团体标准2份。只有6个文件对管理制度的建立提出了具体要求。OLDU的管理需要多个部门或委员会的参与,但只有少数文件明确规定了监管权限和相关各方的责任。这些文件在审批流程、循证评估和知情同意建议方面也存在显著差异。此外,只有少数文件对集中于OLDU和改进不良反应监测的培训和评估提供了具体要求。结论:这些指导文件对OLDU管理的具体建议存在显著差异,对某些关键方面缺乏足够的重视。卫生行政部门推动国家统一指导方针的制定可能是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine
Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
1.40%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine (EMB) is an esteemed international healthcare and medical decision-making journal, dedicated to publishing groundbreaking research outcomes in evidence-based decision-making, research, practice, and education. Serving as the official English-language journal of the Cochrane China Centre and West China Hospital of Sichuan University, we eagerly welcome editorials, commentaries, and systematic reviews encompassing various topics such as clinical trials, policy, drug and patient safety, education, and knowledge translation.
期刊最新文献
Extraversion and the Brain: A Coordinate-Based Meta-Analysis of Functional Brain Imaging Studies on Positive Affect. Characteristics of Quality Improvement Projects in Health Services: A Systematic Scoping Review. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Topical NSAIDs in the Treatment of Sports Injuries. Issue Information Barriers and Facilitators to the Participation of Pregnant Women in Clinical Research: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1