The Impact of Postprocedural Anticoagulant Use in Patients Undergoing Woven EndoBridge: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Study.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Translational Stroke Research Pub Date : 2024-12-24 DOI:10.1007/s12975-024-01320-2
Basel Musmar, Hamza Adel Salim, Joanna M Roy, Nimer Adeeb, Antony A Fuleihan, Elias Atallah, Saman Sizdahkhani, Sravanthi Koduri, Spyridon Karadimas, Bachar El Baba, Brian M Howard, Jonathan A Grossberg, Kyle W Scott, Jan-Karl Burkhardt, Visish M Srinivasan, Fernanda Erazu, Ricardo A Hanel, Abdelaziz Amllay, Charles Matouk, Andrew MacNeil, Nohra Chalouhi, Santiago Gomez-Paz, Ramesh Grandhi, Vinay Jaikumar, Elad Levy, Adnan Siddiqui, Max Klaiman, Josser Delgado, Haydn Hoffman, Adam Arthur, David M Hasan, Christina Notarianni, Hugo H Cuellar, Bharat Guthikonda, Jacques Morcos, Stavropoula I Tjoumakaris, Michael Reid Gooch, Robert H Rosenwasser, Pascal Jabbour
{"title":"The Impact of Postprocedural Anticoagulant Use in Patients Undergoing Woven EndoBridge: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Study.","authors":"Basel Musmar, Hamza Adel Salim, Joanna M Roy, Nimer Adeeb, Antony A Fuleihan, Elias Atallah, Saman Sizdahkhani, Sravanthi Koduri, Spyridon Karadimas, Bachar El Baba, Brian M Howard, Jonathan A Grossberg, Kyle W Scott, Jan-Karl Burkhardt, Visish M Srinivasan, Fernanda Erazu, Ricardo A Hanel, Abdelaziz Amllay, Charles Matouk, Andrew MacNeil, Nohra Chalouhi, Santiago Gomez-Paz, Ramesh Grandhi, Vinay Jaikumar, Elad Levy, Adnan Siddiqui, Max Klaiman, Josser Delgado, Haydn Hoffman, Adam Arthur, David M Hasan, Christina Notarianni, Hugo H Cuellar, Bharat Guthikonda, Jacques Morcos, Stavropoula I Tjoumakaris, Michael Reid Gooch, Robert H Rosenwasser, Pascal Jabbour","doi":"10.1007/s12975-024-01320-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device has become a prominent treatment for wide-neck bifurcation intracranial aneurysms since its FDA approval in 2018. However, the impact of anticoagulant therapy on its efficacy and patient outcomes remains underexplored. This study aims to evaluate the effects of postoperative anticoagulant use on aneurysm occlusion, retreatment rates, and functional outcomes following WEB device implantation. This retrospective multicenter study included 457 patients treated with the WEB device across 10 academic institutions in the United States between January 2012 and June 2024. Patients were categorized based on postoperative anticoagulant use: 91 patients (19.9%) received anticoagulants, while 366 patients (80.1%) did not. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to control for potential confounders, resulting in 316 matched patients (229 non-anticoagulant and 87 anticoagulant). After PSM, the anticoagulant group had lower rates of excellent functional outcomes (mRS 0-1: 73% vs. 85%, p = 0.026) and higher mortality rates (6.7% vs. 3.7%, p = 0.33), though the latter difference was not statistically significant. No significant differences in the last follow-up adequate occlusion were observed between the two groups (p = 0.7). However, patients in the anticoagulant group had lower major device compaction (> 50%) (4.9% vs. 12%, p = 0.12) and retreatment rates (4.6% vs. 12%, p = 0.045). Postoperative anticoagulant use is associated with poor functional outcomes and higher tendency for higher mortality rate. No significant differences in the last follow-up adequate occlusion rate were observed between the anticoagulant group and non-anticoagulant group. However, patients in the anticoagulant group had lower major compaction and retreatment rates. These findings suggest that the WEB mechanism of occlusion is more complex than what have been hypothesized and highlight the need for individualized management strategies to optimize outcomes in patients requiring anticoagulation post-WEB. Further studies are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":23237,"journal":{"name":"Translational Stroke Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Stroke Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12975-024-01320-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device has become a prominent treatment for wide-neck bifurcation intracranial aneurysms since its FDA approval in 2018. However, the impact of anticoagulant therapy on its efficacy and patient outcomes remains underexplored. This study aims to evaluate the effects of postoperative anticoagulant use on aneurysm occlusion, retreatment rates, and functional outcomes following WEB device implantation. This retrospective multicenter study included 457 patients treated with the WEB device across 10 academic institutions in the United States between January 2012 and June 2024. Patients were categorized based on postoperative anticoagulant use: 91 patients (19.9%) received anticoagulants, while 366 patients (80.1%) did not. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to control for potential confounders, resulting in 316 matched patients (229 non-anticoagulant and 87 anticoagulant). After PSM, the anticoagulant group had lower rates of excellent functional outcomes (mRS 0-1: 73% vs. 85%, p = 0.026) and higher mortality rates (6.7% vs. 3.7%, p = 0.33), though the latter difference was not statistically significant. No significant differences in the last follow-up adequate occlusion were observed between the two groups (p = 0.7). However, patients in the anticoagulant group had lower major device compaction (> 50%) (4.9% vs. 12%, p = 0.12) and retreatment rates (4.6% vs. 12%, p = 0.045). Postoperative anticoagulant use is associated with poor functional outcomes and higher tendency for higher mortality rate. No significant differences in the last follow-up adequate occlusion rate were observed between the anticoagulant group and non-anticoagulant group. However, patients in the anticoagulant group had lower major compaction and retreatment rates. These findings suggest that the WEB mechanism of occlusion is more complex than what have been hypothesized and highlight the need for individualized management strategies to optimize outcomes in patients requiring anticoagulation post-WEB. Further studies are needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Translational Stroke Research
Translational Stroke Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
130
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Translational Stroke Research covers basic, translational, and clinical studies. The Journal emphasizes novel approaches to help both to understand clinical phenomenon through basic science tools, and to translate basic science discoveries into the development of new strategies for the prevention, assessment, treatment, and enhancement of central nervous system repair after stroke and other forms of neurotrauma. Translational Stroke Research focuses on translational research and is relevant to both basic scientists and physicians, including but not restricted to neuroscientists, vascular biologists, neurologists, neuroimagers, and neurosurgeons.
期刊最新文献
Development and Validation of a Model Based on Circulating Biomarkers for Discriminating Symptomatic Spontaneous Intracranial Artery Dissection. Escape of Kdm6a from X Chromosome Is Detrimental to Ischemic Brains via IRF5 Signaling. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Induce Brain Edema Around Intracerebral Hematoma via ERK-Mediated Regulation of MMP9 and AQP4. The Impact of Postprocedural Anticoagulant Use in Patients Undergoing Woven EndoBridge: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Study. Global and Regional Burden of Ischemic Stroke Disease from 1990 to 2021: An Age-Period-Cohort Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1