{"title":"Orally dissolving pilocarpine tablets for xerostomia in advanced cancer: A pilot N-of-1 feasibility study.","authors":"Karyn Foster, Geoff Mitchell, Evan Richard, Kathryn J Steadman, Hugh Senior, Rose Estafanos, Janet Hardy","doi":"10.1177/02692163241306269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Xerostomia is a common and difficult symptom experienced by patients with cancer. Pilocarpine is a cholinergic agent that stimulates salivation.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the feasibility of conducting a N-of-1 trial to determine the efficacy of pilocarpine orally dissolving tablets in patients with xerostomia.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled N-of-1 trials of 5 mg pilocarpine tablets vs placebo. Each trial consisted of three 6-day cycles containing pilocarpine (3 days) and placebo (3 days) in random order.</p><p><strong>Setting/participants: </strong>Participants with advanced cancer and xerostomia (scoring >3 on an 11-point numerical rating scale) from any cause, were recruited from an inpatient and outpatient palliative care unit in Brisbane, Australia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen people were recruited in 17 months. Nine withdrew, seven before or during the first 4 days. Three withdrew due to unacceptable side effects. Two participants met the definition of response (⩾2 point reduction in mean scores active vs placebo cycles). When assessing individual cycles, 15 out of 27 cycles (56%) met the definition of response. More people reported at least one mild episode during pilocarpine than placebo of nausea (6 vs 3), vomiting (3 vs 0) and sweating (3 vs 2). About 48% of adverse event classifications were reported in placebo cycles only.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Recruitment to an N-of-1 trial for xerostomia is feasible but attrition was high (50%). Early dropout may have been due to the trial length, complexity, appropriateness or number of questionnaires. Adverse events were generally mild. Two of 10 participants were considered to have benefited from pilocarpine warranting ongoing treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":19849,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"2692163241306269"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163241306269","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Xerostomia is a common and difficult symptom experienced by patients with cancer. Pilocarpine is a cholinergic agent that stimulates salivation.
Aim: To assess the feasibility of conducting a N-of-1 trial to determine the efficacy of pilocarpine orally dissolving tablets in patients with xerostomia.
Design: Double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled N-of-1 trials of 5 mg pilocarpine tablets vs placebo. Each trial consisted of three 6-day cycles containing pilocarpine (3 days) and placebo (3 days) in random order.
Setting/participants: Participants with advanced cancer and xerostomia (scoring >3 on an 11-point numerical rating scale) from any cause, were recruited from an inpatient and outpatient palliative care unit in Brisbane, Australia.
Results: Eighteen people were recruited in 17 months. Nine withdrew, seven before or during the first 4 days. Three withdrew due to unacceptable side effects. Two participants met the definition of response (⩾2 point reduction in mean scores active vs placebo cycles). When assessing individual cycles, 15 out of 27 cycles (56%) met the definition of response. More people reported at least one mild episode during pilocarpine than placebo of nausea (6 vs 3), vomiting (3 vs 0) and sweating (3 vs 2). About 48% of adverse event classifications were reported in placebo cycles only.
Conclusion: Recruitment to an N-of-1 trial for xerostomia is feasible but attrition was high (50%). Early dropout may have been due to the trial length, complexity, appropriateness or number of questionnaires. Adverse events were generally mild. Two of 10 participants were considered to have benefited from pilocarpine warranting ongoing treatment.
背景:口干是癌症患者常见且困难的症状。匹罗卡品是一种能刺激唾液分泌的胆碱类药物。目的:评价采用N-of-1试验确定匹罗卡品口腔溶片治疗口干症疗效的可行性。设计:5mg匹罗卡品片与安慰剂的双盲、交叉、安慰剂对照n / 1试验。每个试验包括三个6天的周期,随机顺序包括匹罗卡品(3天)和安慰剂(3天)。环境/参与者:从澳大利亚布里斯班的住院和门诊姑息治疗单位招募了来自任何原因的晚期癌症和口干症(在11分的数值评定量表中得分为bbbb3)的参与者。结果:17个月共招募18人。9人退出,7人在前4天之前或期间退出。其中三人因副作用退出。两名参与者符合反应的定义(与安慰剂周期相比,平均得分减少2分)。在评估单个周期时,27个周期中有15个(56%)符合反应定义。服用匹罗卡品期间至少有一次轻度恶心(6 vs 3)、呕吐(3 vs 0)和出汗(3 vs 2)的患者多于安慰剂组。仅在安慰剂组中报告了约48%的不良事件分类。结论:招募到N-of-1试验治疗口干是可行的,但损失率很高(50%)。早期退出可能是由于试验的长度、复杂性、适当性或问卷的数量。不良事件一般轻微。10名参与者中有2名被认为受益于匹罗卡品,需要持续治疗。
期刊介绍:
Palliative Medicine is a highly ranked, peer reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to improving knowledge and clinical practice in the palliative care of patients with far advanced disease. This outstanding journal features editorials, original papers, review articles, case reports, correspondence and book reviews. Essential reading for all members of the palliative care team. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).