Social Media Bashing Assessment Scale (SM-BASH): Development and Psychometric Testing.

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psychological Reports Pub Date : 2024-12-23 DOI:10.1177/00332941241311162
Leodoro J Labrague, Chidozie E Nwafor
{"title":"Social Media Bashing Assessment Scale (SM-BASH): Development and Psychometric Testing.","authors":"Leodoro J Labrague, Chidozie E Nwafor","doi":"10.1177/00332941241311162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The pervasive use of social media exposes individuals to negative experiences, including social media bashing, which profoundly impacts mental health, yet there is a conspicuous lack of a standardized scale to assess these experiences. This study assessed the psychometric properties of the Social Media Bashing Assessment Scale (SM-BASH). A total of 978 college students from the Philippines participated in the study. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted to determine the underlying structure of the SM-BASH, followed by a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to validate the model. The scale's reliability was examined using Cronbach's alpha and inter-item/inter-total correlation, while its validity was examined through content and criterion validity tests. The EFA and CFA revealed a two-factor structure model, which explained 70.57% of the total variance, comprising 'Explicit Social Media Bashing' and 'Implicit Social Media Bashing'. The scale demonstrated excellent criterion validity and high internal consistency, with a Cronbach's alpha of .92. The 10-item SM-BASH is a valid and reliable tool for quantifying negative encounters on social media platforms, particularly among student populations. Its strong psychometric properties make it appropriate for use in research and potentially in clinical settings to assess and address the impacts of social media bashing on individuals' well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":21149,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Reports","volume":" ","pages":"332941241311162"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Reports","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941241311162","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The pervasive use of social media exposes individuals to negative experiences, including social media bashing, which profoundly impacts mental health, yet there is a conspicuous lack of a standardized scale to assess these experiences. This study assessed the psychometric properties of the Social Media Bashing Assessment Scale (SM-BASH). A total of 978 college students from the Philippines participated in the study. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted to determine the underlying structure of the SM-BASH, followed by a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to validate the model. The scale's reliability was examined using Cronbach's alpha and inter-item/inter-total correlation, while its validity was examined through content and criterion validity tests. The EFA and CFA revealed a two-factor structure model, which explained 70.57% of the total variance, comprising 'Explicit Social Media Bashing' and 'Implicit Social Media Bashing'. The scale demonstrated excellent criterion validity and high internal consistency, with a Cronbach's alpha of .92. The 10-item SM-BASH is a valid and reliable tool for quantifying negative encounters on social media platforms, particularly among student populations. Its strong psychometric properties make it appropriate for use in research and potentially in clinical settings to assess and address the impacts of social media bashing on individuals' well-being.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会媒体抨击评估量表(SM-BASH):发展和心理测量测试。
社交媒体的普遍使用使个人暴露在负面体验中,包括对社交媒体的抨击,这对心理健康产生了深远的影响,但显然缺乏评估这些体验的标准化尺度。本研究评估了社交媒体抨击评估量表(SM-BASH)的心理测量特征。共有978名来自菲律宾的大学生参与了这项研究。通过探索性因子分析(EFA)确定SM-BASH的基础结构,然后进行验证性因子分析(CFA)验证模型。量表的信度采用Cronbach’s alpha和项目间/整体间相关检验,效度采用内容效度检验和效标效度检验。EFA和CFA揭示了一个双因素结构模型,它解释了总方差的70.57%,包括“显性社交媒体抨击”和“隐性社交媒体抨击”。量表具有良好的效度和较高的内部一致性,Cronbach's alpha为0.92。SM-BASH包含10个项目,是量化社交媒体平台上负面遭遇的有效可靠工具,尤其是在学生群体中。它强大的心理测量特性使其适合用于研究,也可能用于临床环境,以评估和解决社交媒体抨击对个人健康的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Reports
Psychological Reports PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
171
期刊最新文献
A Measure for Assessing Academic Virtues and Strengths in the University Setting: Construction and Initial Examination of Structure and Correlates. How and Why Does Leader Anger Expression Influence Employees' Deviant Innovation? Ability-Based Mianzi Stress and Workplace Anxiety Explanations of the Curvilinear Moderated Relations. Hugging for the Good of Humanity. People Joining the Free Hugs Campaign at Fandom Conventions Have Lighter, less Dark, and More Prosocial Personalities. Understanding the Relationship Between Empathy, Theory of Mind (ToM), and Parenting Styles Among Children With Disruptive Behaviour. Examining the Effect of Threatened Masculinity on Gun Violence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1