Quality of life aspects of intermittent catheterization in neurogenic and non-neurogenic patients: a systematic review on heterogeneity in the measurements used.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Therapeutic Advances in Urology Pub Date : 2024-12-23 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17562872241303447
Tess van Doorn, Rosa L Coolen, Jan Groen, Jeroen R Scheepe, Bertil F M Blok
{"title":"Quality of life aspects of intermittent catheterization in neurogenic and non-neurogenic patients: a systematic review on heterogeneity in the measurements used.","authors":"Tess van Doorn, Rosa L Coolen, Jan Groen, Jeroen R Scheepe, Bertil F M Blok","doi":"10.1177/17562872241303447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) is the golden standard in patients with lower urinary tract dysfunction, leading to bladder emptying problems, due to neurogenic or non-neurogenic causes. CIC affects patient Quality of Life (QoL) both positively and negatively.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this systematic review is to determine which measurements are used to report on the QoL of patients who are on CIC in the currently available literature, to determine the overall QoL of patients who are on CIC and lastly, to determine whether QoL in patients who are on CIC is dependent on the underlying cause (neurogenic vs non-neurogenic).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This systematic review was conducted following the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement.</p><p><strong>Data sources and methods: </strong>The Embase, Medline, Web of Science Core Collection, CINAHL, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane CENTRAL register of trials databases were systematically searched for relevant publications until March 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 4430 abstracts were screened and 43 studies were included. Studies were published between 1993 and 2022 and consisted of only neurogenic patients in 22 studies, the others included a mixed population. The included patient populations and the used measurements/tools were heterogeneous. There were 21 measurements/tools used to measure QoL, of which 3 were not validated. One questionnaire was developed to measure QoL in patients on CIC (intermittent self-catheterization questionnaire). Other measurements were suitable for general health-related QoL, to evaluate neurogenic bladder symptoms or incontinence oriented.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 43 included studies showed a great variety of used tools to measure QoL in patients on CIC due to neurogenic and non-neurogenic causes. Because of lacking uniformity of the measured aspects of QoL, the different included studies could not be compared and subgroup analysis was not performed. Recommendations for future research and practice are provided.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This systematic review was registered and published beforehand at Prospero (CRD42020181777; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero).</p>","PeriodicalId":23010,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Urology","volume":"16 ","pages":"17562872241303447"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11664527/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562872241303447","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) is the golden standard in patients with lower urinary tract dysfunction, leading to bladder emptying problems, due to neurogenic or non-neurogenic causes. CIC affects patient Quality of Life (QoL) both positively and negatively.

Objectives: The aim of this systematic review is to determine which measurements are used to report on the QoL of patients who are on CIC in the currently available literature, to determine the overall QoL of patients who are on CIC and lastly, to determine whether QoL in patients who are on CIC is dependent on the underlying cause (neurogenic vs non-neurogenic).

Design: This systematic review was conducted following the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement.

Data sources and methods: The Embase, Medline, Web of Science Core Collection, CINAHL, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane CENTRAL register of trials databases were systematically searched for relevant publications until March 2023.

Results: A total of 4430 abstracts were screened and 43 studies were included. Studies were published between 1993 and 2022 and consisted of only neurogenic patients in 22 studies, the others included a mixed population. The included patient populations and the used measurements/tools were heterogeneous. There were 21 measurements/tools used to measure QoL, of which 3 were not validated. One questionnaire was developed to measure QoL in patients on CIC (intermittent self-catheterization questionnaire). Other measurements were suitable for general health-related QoL, to evaluate neurogenic bladder symptoms or incontinence oriented.

Conclusion: The 43 included studies showed a great variety of used tools to measure QoL in patients on CIC due to neurogenic and non-neurogenic causes. Because of lacking uniformity of the measured aspects of QoL, the different included studies could not be compared and subgroup analysis was not performed. Recommendations for future research and practice are provided.

Trial registration: This systematic review was registered and published beforehand at Prospero (CRD42020181777; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
神经源性和非神经源性患者间歇导尿的生活质量:对测量方法异质性的系统评价。
背景:清洁间歇导尿(CIC)是下尿路功能障碍患者的黄金标准,由于神经源性或非神经源性原因导致膀胱排空问题。CIC对患者生活质量(QoL)有积极和消极的影响。目的:本系统综述的目的是确定在现有文献中使用哪些测量方法来报告CIC患者的生活质量,确定CIC患者的总体生活质量,最后确定CIC患者的生活质量是否依赖于潜在原因(神经源性与非神经源性)。设计:本系统评价遵循系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目的指导原则进行。数据来源和方法:系统检索Embase、Medline、Web of Science Core Collection、CINAHL、谷歌Scholar和Cochrane CENTRAL register of trials数据库的相关出版物,检索截止日期为2023年3月。结果:共筛选4430篇摘要,纳入43项研究。研究发表于1993年至2022年之间,其中22项研究仅包括神经源性患者,其他研究包括混合人群。纳入的患者群体和使用的测量/工具是异质的。有21个测量/工具用于测量生活质量,其中3个未被验证。制定了一份问卷来测量间歇自我导尿患者的生活质量。其他测量方法适用于一般健康相关的生活质量,以评估神经源性膀胱症状或以失禁为导向。结论:纳入的43项研究显示,用于测量因神经源性和非神经源性原因而接受CIC的患者生活质量的工具多种多样。由于生活质量测量方面缺乏一致性,不同纳入的研究无法进行比较,也没有进行亚组分析。对今后的研究和实践提出了建议。试验注册:本系统评价已在Prospero注册并提前发表(CRD42020181777;https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Urology delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of urology. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in urology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area. The editors welcome articles of current interest across all areas of urology, including treatment of urological disorders, with a focus on emerging pharmacological therapies.
期刊最新文献
Physical activity and testicular cancer survivorship health-related quality of life: a scoping review. Rising public interest in stem cell therapy for erectile dysfunction: an analysis of public perception and a review of the literature. Stone-free rate of laser lithotripsy for large pediatric stones: 15-year experience from a tertiary endourology pediatric center. Introducing a new device for direct in-scope suction technique during flexible ureteroscopy for kidney stone disease: an EAU Section of Endourology prospective multicenter audit using the GLITZ system. Endoscopic injection of botulinum toxin to prevent pouch contractions in a patient with Indiana pouch diversion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1