Predicting Time in Range Without Hypoglycaemia Using a Risk Calculator for Intermittently Scanned CGM in Type 1 Diabetes.

IF 2.7 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1002/edm2.70020
Fernando Sebastian-Valles, Jose Alfonso Arranz Martin, Julia Martínez-Alfonso, Jessica Jiménez-Díaz, Iñigo Hernando Alday, Victor Navas-Moreno, Teresa Armenta Joya, Maria Del Mar Del Fandiño García, Gisela Liz Román Gómez, Jon Garai Hierro, Luis Eduardo Lander Lobariñas, Carmen González-Ávila, Purificación de Martinez de Icaya, Vicente Martínez-Vizcaíno, Miguel Antonio Sampedro-Nuñez, Mónica Marazuela
{"title":"Predicting Time in Range Without Hypoglycaemia Using a Risk Calculator for Intermittently Scanned CGM in Type 1 Diabetes.","authors":"Fernando Sebastian-Valles, Jose Alfonso Arranz Martin, Julia Martínez-Alfonso, Jessica Jiménez-Díaz, Iñigo Hernando Alday, Victor Navas-Moreno, Teresa Armenta Joya, Maria Del Mar Del Fandiño García, Gisela Liz Román Gómez, Jon Garai Hierro, Luis Eduardo Lander Lobariñas, Carmen González-Ávila, Purificación de Martinez de Icaya, Vicente Martínez-Vizcaíno, Miguel Antonio Sampedro-Nuñez, Mónica Marazuela","doi":"10.1002/edm2.70020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the impact of clinical and socio-economic factors on glycaemic control and construct statistical models to predict optimal glycaemic control (OGC) after implementing intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 1072 type 1 diabetes patients (49.0% female) from three centres using isCGM systems. Clinical data and net income from the census tract were collected for each individual. OGC was defined as time in range > 70%, with time below 70 mg/dL < 4%. The sample was randomly split in two equal parts. Logistic regression models to predict OGC were developed in one of the samples, and the best model was selected using the Akaike information criterion and adjusted for Pearson's and Hosmer-Lemeshow's statistics. Model reliability was assessed via external validation in the second sample and internal validation using bootstrap resampling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 2314 models explored, the most effective predictor model included annual net income per person, sex, age, diabetes duration, pre-isCGM HbA1c, insulin dose/kg, and the interaction between sex and HbA1c. When applied to the validation cohort, this model demonstrated 72.6% specificity, 67.3% sensitivity, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.736. The AUC through bootstrap resampling was 0.756. Overall, the model's validity in the external cohort was 80.4%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinical and socio-economic factors significantly influence OGC in type 1 diabetes. The application of statistical models offers a reliable means of predicting the likelihood of achieving OGC following isCGM system implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":36522,"journal":{"name":"Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism","volume":"8 1","pages":"e70020"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11667215/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/edm2.70020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the impact of clinical and socio-economic factors on glycaemic control and construct statistical models to predict optimal glycaemic control (OGC) after implementing intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) systems.

Methods: This retrospective study included 1072 type 1 diabetes patients (49.0% female) from three centres using isCGM systems. Clinical data and net income from the census tract were collected for each individual. OGC was defined as time in range > 70%, with time below 70 mg/dL < 4%. The sample was randomly split in two equal parts. Logistic regression models to predict OGC were developed in one of the samples, and the best model was selected using the Akaike information criterion and adjusted for Pearson's and Hosmer-Lemeshow's statistics. Model reliability was assessed via external validation in the second sample and internal validation using bootstrap resampling.

Results: Out of 2314 models explored, the most effective predictor model included annual net income per person, sex, age, diabetes duration, pre-isCGM HbA1c, insulin dose/kg, and the interaction between sex and HbA1c. When applied to the validation cohort, this model demonstrated 72.6% specificity, 67.3% sensitivity, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.736. The AUC through bootstrap resampling was 0.756. Overall, the model's validity in the external cohort was 80.4%.

Conclusions: Clinical and socio-economic factors significantly influence OGC in type 1 diabetes. The application of statistical models offers a reliable means of predicting the likelihood of achieving OGC following isCGM system implementation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用风险计算器预测1型糖尿病间歇扫描CGM患者无低血糖的时间范围
目的:探讨临床和社会经济因素对血糖控制的影响,并建立统计模型预测间歇扫描连续血糖监测(isCGM)系统实施后的最佳血糖控制(OGC)。方法:本回顾性研究包括来自三个使用isCGM系统的中心的1072例1型糖尿病患者(49.0%为女性)。从人口普查区收集每个人的临床数据和净收入。结果:在2314个模型中,最有效的预测模型包括人均年净收入、性别、年龄、糖尿病病程、iscgm前HbA1c、胰岛素剂量/kg以及性别与HbA1c之间的相互作用。当应用于验证队列时,该模型的特异性为72.6%,敏感性为67.3%,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.736。自举重采样的AUC为0.756。总体而言,该模型在外部队列中的效度为80.4%。结论:临床和社会经济因素对1型糖尿病OGC有显著影响。统计模型的应用为预测isCGM系统实施后实现OGC的可能性提供了可靠的手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Predicting Time in Range Without Hypoglycaemia Using a Risk Calculator for Intermittently Scanned CGM in Type 1 Diabetes. Reduction of Hepatic Fat Content by Dulaglutide for the Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus: A Two-Centre Open, Single-Arm Trial. Blood Cells Parameters in Second Trimester of Pregnancy and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Diagnosis Osteoporosis Risk: Using Machine Learning Algorithms Among Fasa Adults Cohort Study (FACS). Interventions for Type 2 Diabetes Prevention and Management Among Indigenous Children and Youth: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1