Life course social mobility and cognitive function among middle-aged and older adults in India: Exploring heterogeneity by gender

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Social Science & Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117640
Soohyeon Ko , Hannah Oh , S.V. Subramanian , Rockli Kim
{"title":"Life course social mobility and cognitive function among middle-aged and older adults in India: Exploring heterogeneity by gender","authors":"Soohyeon Ko ,&nbsp;Hannah Oh ,&nbsp;S.V. Subramanian ,&nbsp;Rockli Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the link between life course social mobility and cognitive function among middle-aged and older adults in India, specifically emphasizing whether upward and downward mobility exerts symmetric associations and potential gender heterogeneity within these associations. Leveraging data from the Longitudinal Aging Study in India 2017–2018, encompassing 64,710 individuals aged 45 years or above, we classified social mobility as ‘consistently high,’ ‘upward mobility,’ ‘downward mobility,’ and ‘consistently low,’ based on socioeconomic position during childhood and late adulthood. Multivariable regression and gender-interaction analyses were employed to assess associations. Overall, 35.69% maintained a consistently high socioeconomic position, whereas 22.87% remained consistently low; 20.05% experienced upward mobility, and 21.39% faced downward mobility. Compared to consistently high socioeconomic position, consistently low socioeconomic position was associated with lower cognitive function (<em>b</em> = −1.47; 95% CI = −1.59, −1.34), followed by downward mobility (<em>b</em> = −0.84; 95% CI = −0.95, −0.72) and upward mobility (<em>b</em> = −0.72; 95% CI = −0.84, −0.61). Notably, the interaction model revealed significant differences by gender, especially between opposite social mobility groups. Among men, upward and downward mobility displayed asymmetric associations, with upward mobility being associated with a higher cognitive function than downward mobility (<em>b</em> = 0.31; 95% CI = 0.13, 0.50), whereas such differences were not observed for women (<em>b</em> = −0.01; 95% CI = −0.20, 0.17). These findings highlight the critical influence of life course social mobility on cognitive health, with implications for interventions tailored to the unique trajectories of social mobility by gender in India.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"366 ","pages":"Article 117640"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953624010943","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the link between life course social mobility and cognitive function among middle-aged and older adults in India, specifically emphasizing whether upward and downward mobility exerts symmetric associations and potential gender heterogeneity within these associations. Leveraging data from the Longitudinal Aging Study in India 2017–2018, encompassing 64,710 individuals aged 45 years or above, we classified social mobility as ‘consistently high,’ ‘upward mobility,’ ‘downward mobility,’ and ‘consistently low,’ based on socioeconomic position during childhood and late adulthood. Multivariable regression and gender-interaction analyses were employed to assess associations. Overall, 35.69% maintained a consistently high socioeconomic position, whereas 22.87% remained consistently low; 20.05% experienced upward mobility, and 21.39% faced downward mobility. Compared to consistently high socioeconomic position, consistently low socioeconomic position was associated with lower cognitive function (b = −1.47; 95% CI = −1.59, −1.34), followed by downward mobility (b = −0.84; 95% CI = −0.95, −0.72) and upward mobility (b = −0.72; 95% CI = −0.84, −0.61). Notably, the interaction model revealed significant differences by gender, especially between opposite social mobility groups. Among men, upward and downward mobility displayed asymmetric associations, with upward mobility being associated with a higher cognitive function than downward mobility (b = 0.31; 95% CI = 0.13, 0.50), whereas such differences were not observed for women (b = −0.01; 95% CI = −0.20, 0.17). These findings highlight the critical influence of life course social mobility on cognitive health, with implications for interventions tailored to the unique trajectories of social mobility by gender in India.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度中老年人的生命历程、社会流动性和认知功能:按性别探索异质性。
本研究调查了印度中老年人群一生中社会流动与认知功能之间的联系,特别强调了向上和向下流动是否会产生对称关联,以及这些关联中潜在的性别异质性。利用2017-2018年印度纵向老龄化研究的数据,我们根据儿童和成年后期的社会经济地位,将社会流动性分为“持续高”、“向上流动”、“向下流动”和“持续低”。采用多变量回归和性别相互作用分析来评估相关性。总体而言,35.69%的人保持较高的社会经济地位,22.87%的人保持较低的社会经济地位;20.05%的人向上流动,21.39%的人向下流动。与持续较高的社会经济地位相比,持续较低的社会经济地位与较低的认知功能相关(b = -1.47;95% CI = -1.59, -1.34),其次是向下流动(b = -0.84;95% CI = -0.95, -0.72)和上进心(b = -0.72;95% ci = -0.84, -0.61)。值得注意的是,互动模型揭示了性别之间的显著差异,特别是在相反的社会流动群体之间。在男性中,向上和向下流动表现出不对称的关联,向上流动比向下流动具有更高的认知功能(b = 0.31;95% CI = 0.13, 0.50),而在女性中没有观察到这种差异(b = -0.01;95% ci = -0.20, 0.17)。这些发现强调了生命历程中社会流动对认知健康的关键影响,对针对印度按性别划分的独特社会流动轨迹进行干预具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
期刊最新文献
A biopsychosocial approach towards understanding disparities in exercise participation between Hispanic and non-Hispanic White patients living with knee osteoarthritis Ontological pleasure: Exploring eating as enjoyment among people with experience of homelessness Overcoming the “valleys of death” in advanced therapies: The role of finance Who bears the distance cost of public primary healthcare? Hypertension among the elderly in rural India Association of low employment quality with cigarette smoking, smoking initiation, and smoking cessation: A 16-year longitudinal study in South Korea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1