Soohyeon Ko, Hannah Oh, S V Subramanian, Rockli Kim
{"title":"Life course social mobility and cognitive function among middle-aged and older adults in India: Exploring heterogeneity by gender.","authors":"Soohyeon Ko, Hannah Oh, S V Subramanian, Rockli Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigates the link between life course social mobility and cognitive function among middle-aged and older adults in India, specifically emphasizing whether upward and downward mobility exerts symmetric associations and potential gender heterogeneity within these associations. Leveraging data from the Longitudinal Aging Study in India 2017-2018, encompassing 64,710 individuals aged 45 years or above, we classified social mobility as 'consistently high,' 'upward mobility,' 'downward mobility,' and 'consistently low,' based on socioeconomic position during childhood and late adulthood. Multivariable regression and gender-interaction analyses were employed to assess associations. Overall, 35.69% maintained a consistently high socioeconomic position, whereas 22.87% remained consistently low; 20.05% experienced upward mobility, and 21.39% faced downward mobility. Compared to consistently high socioeconomic position, consistently low socioeconomic position was associated with lower cognitive function (b = -1.47; 95% CI = -1.59, -1.34), followed by downward mobility (b = -0.84; 95% CI = -0.95, -0.72) and upward mobility (b = -0.72; 95% CI = -0.84, -0.61). Notably, the interaction model revealed significant differences by gender, especially between opposite social mobility groups. Among men, upward and downward mobility displayed asymmetric associations, with upward mobility being associated with a higher cognitive function than downward mobility (b = 0.31; 95% CI = 0.13, 0.50), whereas such differences were not observed for women (b = -0.01; 95% CI = -0.20, 0.17). These findings highlight the critical influence of life course social mobility on cognitive health, with implications for interventions tailored to the unique trajectories of social mobility by gender in India.</p>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"366 ","pages":"117640"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117640","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study investigates the link between life course social mobility and cognitive function among middle-aged and older adults in India, specifically emphasizing whether upward and downward mobility exerts symmetric associations and potential gender heterogeneity within these associations. Leveraging data from the Longitudinal Aging Study in India 2017-2018, encompassing 64,710 individuals aged 45 years or above, we classified social mobility as 'consistently high,' 'upward mobility,' 'downward mobility,' and 'consistently low,' based on socioeconomic position during childhood and late adulthood. Multivariable regression and gender-interaction analyses were employed to assess associations. Overall, 35.69% maintained a consistently high socioeconomic position, whereas 22.87% remained consistently low; 20.05% experienced upward mobility, and 21.39% faced downward mobility. Compared to consistently high socioeconomic position, consistently low socioeconomic position was associated with lower cognitive function (b = -1.47; 95% CI = -1.59, -1.34), followed by downward mobility (b = -0.84; 95% CI = -0.95, -0.72) and upward mobility (b = -0.72; 95% CI = -0.84, -0.61). Notably, the interaction model revealed significant differences by gender, especially between opposite social mobility groups. Among men, upward and downward mobility displayed asymmetric associations, with upward mobility being associated with a higher cognitive function than downward mobility (b = 0.31; 95% CI = 0.13, 0.50), whereas such differences were not observed for women (b = -0.01; 95% CI = -0.20, 0.17). These findings highlight the critical influence of life course social mobility on cognitive health, with implications for interventions tailored to the unique trajectories of social mobility by gender in India.
期刊介绍:
Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.