Improving Academic Promotion Success via Implementation of Targeted Preparation Strategies and Coaching Processes.

IF 5.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Academic Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000005906
Jacqueline Hill, Enam Haddad, Sarah Braet, Eric Rush, Denise Bratcher
{"title":"Improving Academic Promotion Success via Implementation of Targeted Preparation Strategies and Coaching Processes.","authors":"Jacqueline Hill, Enam Haddad, Sarah Braet, Eric Rush, Denise Bratcher","doi":"10.1097/ACM.0000000000005906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Problem: </strong>Academic promotion is important for faculty career development and retention in academic medicine. However, the promotion process is time consuming, with little guidance offered to ensure successful outcomes. The authors describe their institution's standardized approach to providing clear and reliable academic promotion support and share associated outcomes.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>An academic promotion support process, comprising 4 targeted preparation strategies and 3 coaching processes, was implemented in 2020 at Children's Mercy Kansas City to prepare faculty to submit promotion applications. Targeted preparation strategies include communication plans, an intent to apply process, how-to guides and templates, and institutional promotion committee review. Coaching processes include structured conversations with an immediate faculty leader, an Office of Faculty Development director, and, after committee review of applications, an institutional promotion committee reviewer. Descriptive statistics and promotion outcomes were compared preimplementation (2012-2019) and postimplementation (2020-2023).</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>In 2012-2019 (8 promotion cycles), prior to implementation of the academic promotion support process, 247 faculty applied for academic promotion. After implementation, in 2020-2023 (4 cycles), 196 faculty applied. From pre- to postimplementation, the mean volume of applications per cycle significantly increased from 31 to 49 (P = .03), and the proportion of approved promotion applications significantly increased from 89.5% (221/247) to 99.0% (194/196) (P < .001). No significant differences were observed in the proportions of applicants who were female (P = .77) or non-White (P = .51).</p><p><strong>Next steps: </strong>Creation of an institutional academic promotion support process can be effective in increasing the volume of applications and the likelihood of successful outcomes. Future research should focus on increasing the proportions of non-White faculty and female faculty who apply for promotion and analyzing longer-term outcomes for faculty who are promoted, such as progression to leadership roles.</p>","PeriodicalId":50929,"journal":{"name":"Academic Medicine","volume":"100 1","pages":"28-32"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000005906","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Problem: Academic promotion is important for faculty career development and retention in academic medicine. However, the promotion process is time consuming, with little guidance offered to ensure successful outcomes. The authors describe their institution's standardized approach to providing clear and reliable academic promotion support and share associated outcomes.

Approach: An academic promotion support process, comprising 4 targeted preparation strategies and 3 coaching processes, was implemented in 2020 at Children's Mercy Kansas City to prepare faculty to submit promotion applications. Targeted preparation strategies include communication plans, an intent to apply process, how-to guides and templates, and institutional promotion committee review. Coaching processes include structured conversations with an immediate faculty leader, an Office of Faculty Development director, and, after committee review of applications, an institutional promotion committee reviewer. Descriptive statistics and promotion outcomes were compared preimplementation (2012-2019) and postimplementation (2020-2023).

Outcomes: In 2012-2019 (8 promotion cycles), prior to implementation of the academic promotion support process, 247 faculty applied for academic promotion. After implementation, in 2020-2023 (4 cycles), 196 faculty applied. From pre- to postimplementation, the mean volume of applications per cycle significantly increased from 31 to 49 (P = .03), and the proportion of approved promotion applications significantly increased from 89.5% (221/247) to 99.0% (194/196) (P < .001). No significant differences were observed in the proportions of applicants who were female (P = .77) or non-White (P = .51).

Next steps: Creation of an institutional academic promotion support process can be effective in increasing the volume of applications and the likelihood of successful outcomes. Future research should focus on increasing the proportions of non-White faculty and female faculty who apply for promotion and analyzing longer-term outcomes for faculty who are promoted, such as progression to leadership roles.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过实施有针对性的准备策略和辅导流程,提高学业晋升的成功率。
问题:学术提升对学术医学教师的职业发展和保留很重要。然而,晋升过程是耗时的,几乎没有提供指导,以确保成功的结果。作者描述了他们机构提供清晰可靠的学术推广支持和分享相关成果的标准化方法。方法:2020年,堪萨斯城儿童慈善医院实施了一个学术晋升支持流程,包括4个有针对性的准备策略和3个指导流程,以帮助教师提交晋升申请。有针对性的准备策略包括沟通计划、申请流程意图、操作指南和模板以及机构推广委员会审查。辅导过程包括与直接的教师领导、教师发展主任办公室的结构化对话,以及在委员会审查申请后,与机构推广委员会的审稿人进行对话。对实施前(2012-2019年)和实施后(2020-2023年)的描述性统计和推广结果进行了比较。结果:2012-2019年(8个晋升周期),在实施学术晋升支持流程之前,有247名教师申请学术晋升。实施后,2020-2023年(4个周期),196名教师申请。从实施前到实施后,每个周期的平均申请量从31个显著增加到49个(P = .03),批准的晋升申请比例从89.5%(221/247)显著增加到99.0% (194/196)(P < .001)。在女性申请者(P = 0.77)和非白人申请者(P = 0.51)的比例上没有观察到显著差异。下一步:创建一个机构学术推广支持流程可以有效地增加申请数量和成功结果的可能性。未来的研究应侧重于增加申请晋升的非白人教师和女性教师的比例,并分析获得晋升的教师的长期结果,例如晋升到领导角色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Medicine
Academic Medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
982
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, acts as an international forum for exchanging ideas, information, and strategies to address the significant challenges in academic medicine. The journal covers areas such as research, education, clinical care, community collaboration, and leadership, with a commitment to serving the public interest.
期刊最新文献
Pātanā's Body. Psychometric Properties of Entrustable Professional Activity-Based Objective Structured Clinical Examinations During Transition From Undergraduate to Graduate Medical Education: A Generalizability Study. The Association of Psychotherapy With Burnout, Depression, and Measures of Well-Being in Residents and Fellows: A Pilot Study. Application in Parallel to U.S. Residency Training Programs in Multiple Specialties: Trends and Differences by Applicant Educational Background, 2009-2021. Complexity and Challenges of Cross-Cover Care in Graduate Medical Education: A Qualitative Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1