Indocyanine Green Angiography for Real-time Evaluation of Nasoseptal Flap Vascularity and Perfusion

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Laryngoscope Pub Date : 2024-12-24 DOI:10.1002/lary.31975
Raywat Noiphithak MD, Juan C. Yanez-Siller MD, MPH, Pataravit Rukskul MD, Pornchai Yodwisithsak MD
{"title":"Indocyanine Green Angiography for Real-time Evaluation of Nasoseptal Flap Vascularity and Perfusion","authors":"Raywat Noiphithak MD,&nbsp;Juan C. Yanez-Siller MD, MPH,&nbsp;Pataravit Rukskul MD,&nbsp;Pornchai Yodwisithsak MD","doi":"10.1002/lary.31975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To investigate the characteristics of the vascular pedicle of the nasoseptal flap (NSF) and its perfusion patterns using intraoperative indocyanine green (ICG) angiography during endoscopic skull base surgery (ESBS), and examine the correlation between ICG perfusion patterns and clinical outcomes, including postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak and flap necrosis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study enrolled patients undergoing ESBS between January 2017 and December 2021. Intraoperative ICG angiography was performed to visualize the arterial supply of the nasal septum and evaluate NSF perfusion. Postoperative CT scans and clinical follow-ups were conducted to assess flap outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 126 patients were included in the study. The posterior septal artery (PSA) was most commonly identified in the middle third of the sphenoidal rostrum (63.5% right, 60.3% left). Three branching patterns were observed: single-branch (58.7% right, 64.3% left), double-branch (12.7% right, 11.1% left), and reticular-branch (26.6% right, 24.6% left). Among 72 patients who underwent NSF placement, ICG angiography showed full enhancement in 37 patients (51.4%), partial enhancement in 27 patients (37.5%), and no enhancement in eight patients (11.1%). Postoperative CSF leak occurred in eight patients (11.1%), with no significant correlation to ICG enhancement patterns (<i>p</i> = 0.07). Flap necrosis occurred in five patients (6.9%), all of whom had shown no ICG enhancement beyond the pedicle (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>ICG angiography is a valuable tool for visualizing the vascular supply of NSF during ESBS. While it does not correlate with postoperative CSF leak, ICG enhancement pattern showed a significant association with flap necrosis. This technique may contribute to improved surgical outcomes and reduced complications in NSF reconstructions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\n \n <p>3 <i>Laryngoscope</i>, 135:1060–1065, 2025</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49921,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope","volume":"135 3","pages":"1060-1065"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lary.31975","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lary.31975","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate the characteristics of the vascular pedicle of the nasoseptal flap (NSF) and its perfusion patterns using intraoperative indocyanine green (ICG) angiography during endoscopic skull base surgery (ESBS), and examine the correlation between ICG perfusion patterns and clinical outcomes, including postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak and flap necrosis.

Methods

This study enrolled patients undergoing ESBS between January 2017 and December 2021. Intraoperative ICG angiography was performed to visualize the arterial supply of the nasal septum and evaluate NSF perfusion. Postoperative CT scans and clinical follow-ups were conducted to assess flap outcomes.

Results

A total of 126 patients were included in the study. The posterior septal artery (PSA) was most commonly identified in the middle third of the sphenoidal rostrum (63.5% right, 60.3% left). Three branching patterns were observed: single-branch (58.7% right, 64.3% left), double-branch (12.7% right, 11.1% left), and reticular-branch (26.6% right, 24.6% left). Among 72 patients who underwent NSF placement, ICG angiography showed full enhancement in 37 patients (51.4%), partial enhancement in 27 patients (37.5%), and no enhancement in eight patients (11.1%). Postoperative CSF leak occurred in eight patients (11.1%), with no significant correlation to ICG enhancement patterns (p = 0.07). Flap necrosis occurred in five patients (6.9%), all of whom had shown no ICG enhancement beyond the pedicle (p < 0.01).

Conclusions

ICG angiography is a valuable tool for visualizing the vascular supply of NSF during ESBS. While it does not correlate with postoperative CSF leak, ICG enhancement pattern showed a significant association with flap necrosis. This technique may contribute to improved surgical outcomes and reduced complications in NSF reconstructions.

Level of Evidence

3 Laryngoscope, 135:1060–1065, 2025

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
吲哚菁绿血管造影术实时评价鼻中隔皮瓣血运和血流灌注。
目的:通过内镜颅底手术(ESBS)术中吲啶青绿(ICG)血管造影,探讨鼻中隔皮瓣(NSF)血管蒂的特征及其血流灌注模式,并探讨ICG血流灌注模式与术后脑脊液(CSF)漏出及皮瓣坏死等临床结局的相关性。方法:本研究招募了2017年1月至2021年12月期间接受ESBS治疗的患者。术中进行ICG血管造影,观察鼻中隔动脉供应情况,评估NSF灌注情况。术后CT扫描和临床随访评估皮瓣的效果。结果:共纳入126例患者。后间隔动脉(PSA)最常见于蝶喙的中间三分之一(63.5%右侧,60.3%左侧)。观察到三种分支模式:单分支(58.7%右,64.3%左)、双分支(12.7%右,11.1%左)和网状分支(26.6%右,24.6%左)。在72例接受NSF植入的患者中,ICG血管造影显示37例(51.4%)患者完全增强,27例(37.5%)患者部分增强,8例(11.1%)患者无增强。8例(11.1%)患者术后发生脑脊液漏,与ICG增强模式无显著相关性(p = 0.07)。5例(6.9%)患者发生皮瓣坏死,所有患者均未显示除蒂以外的ICG增强(p)。结论:ICG血管造影是观察ESBS期间NSF血管供应的一种有价值的工具。虽然与术后脑脊液泄漏无关,但ICG增强模式显示与皮瓣坏死有显著相关性。该技术有助于改善手术效果,减少NSF重建的并发症。证据级别:3喉镜,2024。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Laryngoscope
Laryngoscope 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
500
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Laryngoscope has been the leading source of information on advances in the diagnosis and treatment of head and neck disorders since 1890. The Laryngoscope is the first choice among otolaryngologists for publication of their important findings and techniques. Each monthly issue of The Laryngoscope features peer-reviewed medical, clinical, and research contributions in general otolaryngology, allergy/rhinology, otology/neurotology, laryngology/bronchoesophagology, head and neck surgery, sleep medicine, pediatric otolaryngology, facial plastics and reconstructive surgery, oncology, and communicative disorders. Contributions include papers and posters presented at the Annual and Section Meetings of the Triological Society, as well as independent papers, "How I Do It", "Triological Best Practice" articles, and contemporary reviews. Theses authored by the Triological Society’s new Fellows as well as papers presented at meetings of the American Laryngological Association are published in The Laryngoscope. • Broncho-esophagology • Communicative disorders • Head and neck surgery • Plastic and reconstructive facial surgery • Oncology • Speech and hearing defects
期刊最新文献
Suicidal Ideation and Behaviors in Adults With Tinnitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. What Is the Current Management of Osteoradionecrosis of the Temporal Bone Following Head and Neck Cancer Radiotherapy? Comparing Tinnitus Suppression in Asymmetric Hearing Loss and Single-Sided Deafness: Cochlear Versus Bone Conduction Implants. Nasopharyngeal Augmentation for Velopharyngeal Insufficiency Treatment in Wind Instrument Players. Rare Hypopharyngeal Polyp Presenting Without Dysphagia: A Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1