Cultivating the conditions for care: it's all about trust.

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Frontiers in health services Pub Date : 2024-12-09 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frhs.2024.1471183
Allison Kooijman, Carolyn Canfield
{"title":"Cultivating the conditions for care: it's all about trust.","authors":"Allison Kooijman, Carolyn Canfield","doi":"10.3389/frhs.2024.1471183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This perspective article shares the viewpoints of two long-standing patient safety advocates who have participated first-hand in the evolution of patient engagement in healthcare quality and safety. Their involvement is motivated by a rejection of the common cruelty of institutional betrayal that compounds harm when patient safety fails. The advocates have sought to understand how it can be that fractured trust spreads so predictably after harm, just when it most needs strengthening. Instead, the abandonment of trust upends healthcare values and effectiveness at interpersonal, systemic and structural levels. They argue that authentic care (healthcare that is truly caring) transcends mere service delivery, thus embodying an inviolable commitment to mutual well-being, compassion and generosity. The advocates identify the influence of social determinants, such as culture, identity, and socioeconomic status, as critical to trust formation, where pathogenic vulnerability exacerbates existing inequalities and further impedes trust. The advocates call for a shift from transactional to relational, trust-based interactions that explore the potential for mobilizing restorative justice principles to repair harm and rebuild trust, enabling dialogue, mutual understanding and systemic improvement. Trust, they assert, is born in relationships, not transactions. The bureaucratic, legal and resource constraints that often impair meaningful interactions, also cause moral distress to healthcare providers and poor care quality for patients. They argue that central to the current healthcare crisis is the fundamental need for genuine connection and trust, framing this as both a practical necessity and a confirmation of humanity as intrinsic to healthcare. The advocates envision a future where patient engagement is integral to patient safety to prioritize epistemic justice, mutual respect and compassionate care, to restore healthcare as a cohesive, supportive and deeply human endeavor. They query what contributions a restorative approach could make to centre trust as necessary for cultivating the conditions for care in our healthcare system.</p>","PeriodicalId":73088,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in health services","volume":"4 ","pages":"1471183"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11663927/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in health services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2024.1471183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This perspective article shares the viewpoints of two long-standing patient safety advocates who have participated first-hand in the evolution of patient engagement in healthcare quality and safety. Their involvement is motivated by a rejection of the common cruelty of institutional betrayal that compounds harm when patient safety fails. The advocates have sought to understand how it can be that fractured trust spreads so predictably after harm, just when it most needs strengthening. Instead, the abandonment of trust upends healthcare values and effectiveness at interpersonal, systemic and structural levels. They argue that authentic care (healthcare that is truly caring) transcends mere service delivery, thus embodying an inviolable commitment to mutual well-being, compassion and generosity. The advocates identify the influence of social determinants, such as culture, identity, and socioeconomic status, as critical to trust formation, where pathogenic vulnerability exacerbates existing inequalities and further impedes trust. The advocates call for a shift from transactional to relational, trust-based interactions that explore the potential for mobilizing restorative justice principles to repair harm and rebuild trust, enabling dialogue, mutual understanding and systemic improvement. Trust, they assert, is born in relationships, not transactions. The bureaucratic, legal and resource constraints that often impair meaningful interactions, also cause moral distress to healthcare providers and poor care quality for patients. They argue that central to the current healthcare crisis is the fundamental need for genuine connection and trust, framing this as both a practical necessity and a confirmation of humanity as intrinsic to healthcare. The advocates envision a future where patient engagement is integral to patient safety to prioritize epistemic justice, mutual respect and compassionate care, to restore healthcare as a cohesive, supportive and deeply human endeavor. They query what contributions a restorative approach could make to centre trust as necessary for cultivating the conditions for care in our healthcare system.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
培养关怀的条件:这都是关于信任的。
这篇观点文章分享了两位长期倡导患者安全的人士的观点,他们亲身参与了患者参与医疗保健质量和安全的演变。他们参与的动机是拒绝机构背叛的常见残酷,当患者安全失败时,这种背叛会加剧伤害。支持者们试图理解,在最需要加强信任的时候,支离破碎的信任是如何在受到伤害后如此可预见地蔓延开来的。相反,放弃信任颠覆了医疗保健在人际、系统和结构层面的价值和有效性。他们认为,真正的关怀(真正关怀的医疗保健)超越了单纯的服务提供,因此体现了对共同福祉、同情和慷慨的不可侵犯的承诺。倡议者认为,文化、身份和社会经济地位等社会决定因素的影响对信任的形成至关重要,而致病的脆弱性加剧了现有的不平等,进一步阻碍了信任。倡导者呼吁从事务性互动转向关系型、基于信任的互动,探索动员恢复性司法原则修复伤害和重建信任的潜力,使对话、相互理解和系统改进成为可能。他们断言,信任源于关系,而非交易。官僚主义、法律和资源限制往往会损害有意义的互动,也会给医疗保健提供者带来道德困扰,并导致患者的护理质量低下。他们认为,当前医疗保健危机的核心是对真正联系和信任的基本需求,这既是一种实际需要,也是对人性作为医疗保健内在本质的确认。倡导者设想了这样一个未来:患者参与是患者安全不可或缺的一部分,优先考虑知识正义、相互尊重和富有同情心的护理,将医疗保健恢复为一种凝聚力、支持性和深刻的人类努力。他们质疑一种恢复性的方法可以对中心信任做出什么贡献,这是在我们的医疗体系中培养护理条件所必需的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Closing the mental health gap: transforming Pakistan's mental health landscape. Influence of working conditions on German paramedics' intention to leave the profession: a cross-sectional study. Perspectives of health workers on the facilitators and barriers to antiretroviral therapy adherence following intensive adherence counseling in Northern Uganda. Enhancing access to primary care is critical to the future of an equitable health service: using process visualisation to understand the impact of national policy in the UK. Corrigendum: Organizational readiness for change towards implementing a sepsis survivor hospital to home transition-in-care protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1