Organizational form and liquidity management: Evidence from open- vs. closed-end municipal bond funds

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Finance Research Letters Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1016/j.frl.2024.106499
John Chalmers , Z. Jay Wang , Jingyun Yang
{"title":"Organizational form and liquidity management: Evidence from open- vs. closed-end municipal bond funds","authors":"John Chalmers ,&nbsp;Z. Jay Wang ,&nbsp;Jingyun Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.frl.2024.106499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper studies how the organizational forms of open- and closed-end funds affect their ability to manage illiquid assets. We use a sample of municipal bond funds from 2002 to 2015 to compare the portfolio liquidity and performance of open- and closed-end funds. We find that immunity to redemption risk allows closed-end funds to hold more illiquid municipal bonds than open-end funds, and they charge higher management fees for such liquidity provision. Closed-end funds earn liquidity premiums from their illiquid holdings. They significantly underperform peer open-end funds after controlling for their exposure to liquidity risk. Highly leveraged closed-end funds are subject to systematic liquidity risk. We find that closed-end funds with higher leverage hold more liquid municipal bonds. They trade more liquid municipal bonds to reduce the potential costs at forced deleverage.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12167,"journal":{"name":"Finance Research Letters","volume":"73 ","pages":"Article 106499"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Finance Research Letters","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612324015289","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper studies how the organizational forms of open- and closed-end funds affect their ability to manage illiquid assets. We use a sample of municipal bond funds from 2002 to 2015 to compare the portfolio liquidity and performance of open- and closed-end funds. We find that immunity to redemption risk allows closed-end funds to hold more illiquid municipal bonds than open-end funds, and they charge higher management fees for such liquidity provision. Closed-end funds earn liquidity premiums from their illiquid holdings. They significantly underperform peer open-end funds after controlling for their exposure to liquidity risk. Highly leveraged closed-end funds are subject to systematic liquidity risk. We find that closed-end funds with higher leverage hold more liquid municipal bonds. They trade more liquid municipal bonds to reduce the potential costs at forced deleverage.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
组织形式与流动性管理:来自开放式与封闭式市政债券基金的证据
本文研究了开放式基金和封闭式基金的组织形式对其非流动性资产管理能力的影响。我们以2002 - 2015年的市政债券基金为样本,比较了开放式和封闭式基金的投资组合流动性和绩效。我们发现,对赎回风险的免疫力使得封闭式基金比开放式基金持有更多的非流动性市政债券,并且它们对这种流动性提供收取更高的管理费。封闭式基金从其非流动性资产中赚取流动性溢价。在控制流动性风险敞口后,它们的表现明显落后于同行开放式基金。高杠杆封闭式基金面临系统性流动性风险。我们发现,杠杆率较高的封闭式基金持有流动性更强的市政债券。他们交易流动性更强的市政债券,以降低被迫去杠杆化的潜在成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Finance Research Letters
Finance Research Letters BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
14.40%
发文量
863
期刊介绍: Finance Research Letters welcomes submissions across all areas of finance, aiming for rapid publication of significant new findings. The journal particularly encourages papers that provide insight into the replicability of established results, examine the cross-national applicability of previous findings, challenge existing methodologies, or demonstrate methodological contingencies. Papers are invited in the following areas: Actuarial studies Alternative investments Asset Pricing Bankruptcy and liquidation Banks and other Depository Institutions Behavioral and experimental finance Bibliometric and Scientometric studies of finance Capital budgeting and corporate investment Capital markets and accounting Capital structure and payout policy Commodities Contagion, crises and interdependence Corporate governance Credit and fixed income markets and instruments Derivatives Emerging markets Energy Finance and Energy Markets Financial Econometrics Financial History Financial intermediation and money markets Financial markets and marketplaces Financial Mathematics and Econophysics Financial Regulation and Law Forecasting Frontier market studies International Finance Market efficiency, event studies Mergers, acquisitions and the market for corporate control Micro Finance Institutions Microstructure Non-bank Financial Institutions Personal Finance Portfolio choice and investing Real estate finance and investing Risk SME, Family and Entrepreneurial Finance
期刊最新文献
Intellectual property protection and firm innovation capability Resourceful and resilient: Linking human resource quality and organizational resilience Can strict regulation lead to low risk premium? The impact of securities regulatory enforcement intensity on the cost of equity capital Dynamic resilience assessment of the shipping market to extreme carbon trading price tail shocks: A scenario-based QVAR approach Blockchain-enabled supply chain finance and credit risk of small and medium-sized enterprises: Evidence from e-commerce
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1