{"title":"Proportional Ear Reduction: The Rule of Threes.","authors":"Ahmet Seyhan","doi":"10.1007/s00266-024-04611-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Human ear growth continues beyond puberty, resulting in ears that are typically approximately 10 millimeters (mm) larger in older individuals compared to their younger counterparts. Not only is the overall growth of the ear an indicator of age, but also the disproportionate growth of its parts. The largest part, the concha, shows the slowest growth rate, while the smallest part, the earlobe, shows the greatest growth rate. Thus, over time, the net increases in the scapha, concha, and earlobe become nearly equal. Therefore, it is appropriate to make approximately equal reductions from each unit in order to restore a youthful balance to the ear.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Aged and large, but otherwise normal, ears were selected for use of the \"rule of threes\" technique. This technique involves reducing the height of each of the three units (scapha, concha, and earlobe) by approximately 3 mm. Depending on individual needs, reductions were also applied to two units or just one unit as necessary. Adjustments in reduction amounts were made for previously disproportionate ears.</p><p><strong>Patients and results: </strong>A total of 32 ears from 16 patients were included in the study. Scapha reduction was performed on six patients, scapha and concha reduction on five patients, combined (including earlobe) reduction on two patients, and isolated earlobe reduction on three patients. All patients were followed up for at least 6 months. The planned reduction target was achieved in all cases, resulting in balanced youthful ears. Two skin sloughs in the earlobe, one requiring revision, and bilateral hypertrophic scarring behind the earlobe were observed in one case.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The described ear reduction technique yields satisfactory results when performed with precision. Each ear should be assessed individually, allowing for some flexibility rather than strict adherence to the proposed amounts of reduction. Care must be taken not to disrupt the blood supply to the ear structures. Achieving harmony at junction lines requires careful planning and meticulous technique.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence iv: </strong>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.</p>","PeriodicalId":7609,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-04611-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Human ear growth continues beyond puberty, resulting in ears that are typically approximately 10 millimeters (mm) larger in older individuals compared to their younger counterparts. Not only is the overall growth of the ear an indicator of age, but also the disproportionate growth of its parts. The largest part, the concha, shows the slowest growth rate, while the smallest part, the earlobe, shows the greatest growth rate. Thus, over time, the net increases in the scapha, concha, and earlobe become nearly equal. Therefore, it is appropriate to make approximately equal reductions from each unit in order to restore a youthful balance to the ear.
Method: Aged and large, but otherwise normal, ears were selected for use of the "rule of threes" technique. This technique involves reducing the height of each of the three units (scapha, concha, and earlobe) by approximately 3 mm. Depending on individual needs, reductions were also applied to two units or just one unit as necessary. Adjustments in reduction amounts were made for previously disproportionate ears.
Patients and results: A total of 32 ears from 16 patients were included in the study. Scapha reduction was performed on six patients, scapha and concha reduction on five patients, combined (including earlobe) reduction on two patients, and isolated earlobe reduction on three patients. All patients were followed up for at least 6 months. The planned reduction target was achieved in all cases, resulting in balanced youthful ears. Two skin sloughs in the earlobe, one requiring revision, and bilateral hypertrophic scarring behind the earlobe were observed in one case.
Conclusion: The described ear reduction technique yields satisfactory results when performed with precision. Each ear should be assessed individually, allowing for some flexibility rather than strict adherence to the proposed amounts of reduction. Care must be taken not to disrupt the blood supply to the ear structures. Achieving harmony at junction lines requires careful planning and meticulous technique.
Level of evidence iv: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
期刊介绍:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is a publication of the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and the official journal of the European Association of Societies of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (EASAPS), Società Italiana di Chirurgia Plastica Ricostruttiva ed Estetica (SICPRE), Vereinigung der Deutschen Aesthetisch Plastischen Chirurgen (VDAPC), the Romanian Aesthetic Surgery Society (RASS), Asociación Española de Cirugía Estética Plástica (AECEP), La Sociedad Argentina de Cirugía Plástica, Estética y Reparadora (SACPER), the Rhinoplasty Society of Europe (RSE), the Iranian Society of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgeons (ISPAS), the Singapore Association of Plastic Surgeons (SAPS), the Australasian Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (ASAPS), the Egyptian Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (ESPRS), and the Sociedad Chilena de Cirugía Plástica, Reconstructiva y Estética (SCCP).
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery provides a forum for original articles advancing the art of aesthetic plastic surgery. Many describe surgical craftsmanship; others deal with complications in surgical procedures and methods by which to treat or avoid them. Coverage includes "second thoughts" on established techniques, which might be abandoned, modified, or improved. Also included are case histories; improvements in surgical instruments, pharmaceuticals, and operating room equipment; and discussions of problems such as the role of psychosocial factors in the doctor-patient and the patient-public interrelationships.
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is covered in Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, SciSearch, Research Alert, Index Medicus-Medline, and Excerpta Medica/Embase.