Basic ENT training for enhanced healthcare worker knowledge, attitudes and practices in a resource-limited setting: a pre-post and post-post cross-sectional study.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMJ Open Pub Date : 2024-12-23 DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086684
Lufunda Lukama, Colleen Aldous, Sinoya Mbewe, Charles Michelo, Chester Kalinda
{"title":"Basic ENT training for enhanced healthcare worker knowledge, attitudes and practices in a resource-limited setting: a pre-post and post-post cross-sectional study.","authors":"Lufunda Lukama, Colleen Aldous, Sinoya Mbewe, Charles Michelo, Chester Kalinda","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Diagnostic errors in ear, nose and throat (ENT) diseases are prevalent among healthcare workers (HCWs) in resource-limited settings, yet comprehensive data that describe HCW knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) regarding ENT disease management remains scarce. Further, the impact of basic ENT training on HCW KAP in such settings is largely undetermined.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We assessed HCW KAP before and after basic training in ENT disease management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This questionnaire-based pre-post-test cross-sectional survey employed HCW training in public hospitals in a resource-limited setting. We conducted a 2-day training, preceded by a pretraining survey, followed by immediate and 5-month post-training assessments using a prevalidated questionnaire. 416 HCWs participated and were selected through probability-proportionate-to-size random sampling. Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to assess pre-post training KAP variations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, the median (IQR) percentage knowledge scores for HCWs in general ENT, ear, sinonasal and head and neck disease management were 60 (40), 55 (18), 58.3 (25) and 56 (22.6), respectively. Only 33.8% (133/394) of HCWs had access to an otoscope, 25.5% (101/396) to a headlight and 12.1% (48/397) to a nasal speculum. While 99.2% (390/393) of HCWs considered ENT important, 57.8% (226/391) of them lacked the confidence to correctly diagnose and manage most ENT conditions. At the immediate post-training assessment, HCWs' median knowledge scores increased by 20%, 18%, 25% and 33% for general ENT, ear, sinonasal and head and neck disease management, respectively (p<0.001). Further, the proportions of HCWs consistently performing otoscopy and using ENT guidelines increased from 15.1% (43/284) and 13.8% (48/282) to 35.5 (44/124) and 23.9% (27/113) 5 months post-training.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study underscores the critical need for continuous medical education (CME) to address knowledge gaps and improve HCW attitudes and practices. The findings provide valuable insights for policymakers aiming to enhance ENT healthcare delivery in resource-limited settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"14 12","pages":"e086684"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11667463/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086684","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Diagnostic errors in ear, nose and throat (ENT) diseases are prevalent among healthcare workers (HCWs) in resource-limited settings, yet comprehensive data that describe HCW knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) regarding ENT disease management remains scarce. Further, the impact of basic ENT training on HCW KAP in such settings is largely undetermined.

Objective: We assessed HCW KAP before and after basic training in ENT disease management.

Methods: This questionnaire-based pre-post-test cross-sectional survey employed HCW training in public hospitals in a resource-limited setting. We conducted a 2-day training, preceded by a pretraining survey, followed by immediate and 5-month post-training assessments using a prevalidated questionnaire. 416 HCWs participated and were selected through probability-proportionate-to-size random sampling. Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to assess pre-post training KAP variations.

Results: At baseline, the median (IQR) percentage knowledge scores for HCWs in general ENT, ear, sinonasal and head and neck disease management were 60 (40), 55 (18), 58.3 (25) and 56 (22.6), respectively. Only 33.8% (133/394) of HCWs had access to an otoscope, 25.5% (101/396) to a headlight and 12.1% (48/397) to a nasal speculum. While 99.2% (390/393) of HCWs considered ENT important, 57.8% (226/391) of them lacked the confidence to correctly diagnose and manage most ENT conditions. At the immediate post-training assessment, HCWs' median knowledge scores increased by 20%, 18%, 25% and 33% for general ENT, ear, sinonasal and head and neck disease management, respectively (p<0.001). Further, the proportions of HCWs consistently performing otoscopy and using ENT guidelines increased from 15.1% (43/284) and 13.8% (48/282) to 35.5 (44/124) and 23.9% (27/113) 5 months post-training.

Conclusions: This study underscores the critical need for continuous medical education (CME) to address knowledge gaps and improve HCW attitudes and practices. The findings provide valuable insights for policymakers aiming to enhance ENT healthcare delivery in resource-limited settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基础耳鼻喉科培训,在资源有限的情况下提高保健工作者的知识、态度和做法:岗前和岗后横断面研究。
在资源有限的环境中,耳鼻喉科(ENT)疾病的诊断错误在卫生保健工作者(HCWs)中很普遍,但描述卫生保健工作者(HCWs)关于耳鼻喉科疾病管理的知识、态度和实践(KAP)的综合数据仍然很少。此外,基本耳鼻喉科培训对HCW KAP的影响在这种情况下很大程度上是不确定的。目的:评估耳鼻喉科疾病管理基础培训前后的HCW KAP。方法:在资源有限的公立医院进行HCW培训,采用问卷法进行测试前-测试后横断面调查。我们进行了为期2天的培训,在此之前进行了培训前调查,然后使用预先验证的问卷进行了培训后立即和5个月的评估。416名卫生保健工作者参与,并通过概率比例随机抽样选择。使用Wilcoxon配对对有号秩检验和Kruskal-Wallis检验来评估训练前后KAP的变化。结果:基线时,普通耳鼻喉科、耳部、鼻鼻部和头颈部疾病管理的中位数(IQR)百分比知识得分分别为60(40)、55(18)、58.3(25)和56(22.6)。只有33.8%(133/394)的医护人员使用了耳镜,25.5%(101/396)使用了车头灯,12.1%(48/397)使用了鼻镜。99.2%(390/393)的医护人员认为耳鼻喉科很重要,57.8%(226/391)的医护人员对大多数耳鼻喉科疾病缺乏正确诊断和管理的信心。在培训后立即评估中,普通耳鼻喉科、耳科、鼻鼻科和头颈部疾病管理的中位数知识得分分别提高了20%、18%、25%和33%(结论:本研究强调了继续医学教育(CME)解决知识差距和改善医护人员态度和做法的必要性。研究结果为决策者在资源有限的环境下提高耳鼻喉科医疗服务提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
期刊最新文献
Designing an implementation strategy to improve referral from general practice to a National Diabetes Prevention Programme using a Delphi survey with healthcare professionals and the Behaviour Change Wheel. Impact of portal vein embolisation uses in colorectal liver metastases: evidence from a rapid review. Dietary practices among antenatal women in Sri Lanka: prevalence and associated factors. Left atrial appendage closure versus direct oral anticoagulants after pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation: protocol for a multicentre, prospective, randomised, non-inferiority trial (PROMOTE study). Perspectives on primary healthcare careers across career stages among medical students and primary healthcare providers in China's Greater Bay Area: a qualitative interview study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1