Computer Assisted Nodule Analysis and Risk Yield is Associated With Occult Lymph Node Status in Clinical Stage I-IIA Lung Adenocarcinoma Undergoing Resection.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Clinical lung cancer Pub Date : 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1016/j.cllc.2024.11.013
Duy Pham, Ju Ae Park, Hongkun Wang, Melanie Subramanian, Michael J Weyant, Kei Suzuki
{"title":"Computer Assisted Nodule Analysis and Risk Yield is Associated With Occult Lymph Node Status in Clinical Stage I-IIA Lung Adenocarcinoma Undergoing Resection.","authors":"Duy Pham, Ju Ae Park, Hongkun Wang, Melanie Subramanian, Michael J Weyant, Kei Suzuki","doi":"10.1016/j.cllc.2024.11.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current staging work-up does not capture all occult lymph node (OLN) disease. We sought to determine if Computer Assisted Nodule Analysis and Risk Yield (CANARY) analysis could help distinguish OLN status in early-stage lung adenocarcinoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective review of resected lung cancer patients from 2016 to 2021 was performed. Patients with surgically resected clinical stage I-IIA lung adenocarcinoma were included. Preoperative imaging was entered into the CANARY software, and each lesion was categorized into good, intermediate, and poor risk. OLN status was determined per pathology results. Pearson's Chi-square correlation, univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to assess OLN metastases as a function of CANARY risk profile, with statistical significance at α=0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, the study cohort included 228 patients with median age of 70. By clinical stage, 195 (85.5%), 24 (10.5%), and 9 (3.9%) patients were determined to be in IA, IB, and IIA, respectively. 28 (12.3%) patients were found to have OLN metastases. Among them, 1 (3.6%), 3 (10.7%), and 24 (85.7%) patients had a good, intermediate, and poor CANARY risk profile, respectively. CANARY risk profile was significantly associated with OLN metastases (χ2 = 9.9, P = .007). Relative to the good/intermediate group, patients with poor risk had a more-than 3-fold increase in likelihood of having OLN metastases (odd ratio [OR] = 3.3, 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.6-9.2, P = .007).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CANARY analysis was able to risk-stratify the likelihood of OLN metastases in early-stage lung adenocarcinoma. CANARY can provide an adjunctive non-invasive tool to aid in determining an appropriate individualized treatment plan.</p>","PeriodicalId":10490,"journal":{"name":"Clinical lung cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical lung cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2024.11.013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Current staging work-up does not capture all occult lymph node (OLN) disease. We sought to determine if Computer Assisted Nodule Analysis and Risk Yield (CANARY) analysis could help distinguish OLN status in early-stage lung adenocarcinoma.

Methods: Retrospective review of resected lung cancer patients from 2016 to 2021 was performed. Patients with surgically resected clinical stage I-IIA lung adenocarcinoma were included. Preoperative imaging was entered into the CANARY software, and each lesion was categorized into good, intermediate, and poor risk. OLN status was determined per pathology results. Pearson's Chi-square correlation, univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to assess OLN metastases as a function of CANARY risk profile, with statistical significance at α=0.05.

Results: In total, the study cohort included 228 patients with median age of 70. By clinical stage, 195 (85.5%), 24 (10.5%), and 9 (3.9%) patients were determined to be in IA, IB, and IIA, respectively. 28 (12.3%) patients were found to have OLN metastases. Among them, 1 (3.6%), 3 (10.7%), and 24 (85.7%) patients had a good, intermediate, and poor CANARY risk profile, respectively. CANARY risk profile was significantly associated with OLN metastases (χ2 = 9.9, P = .007). Relative to the good/intermediate group, patients with poor risk had a more-than 3-fold increase in likelihood of having OLN metastases (odd ratio [OR] = 3.3, 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.6-9.2, P = .007).

Conclusion: CANARY analysis was able to risk-stratify the likelihood of OLN metastases in early-stage lung adenocarcinoma. CANARY can provide an adjunctive non-invasive tool to aid in determining an appropriate individualized treatment plan.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical lung cancer
Clinical lung cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.80%
发文量
159
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Lung Cancer is a peer-reviewed bimonthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of lung cancer. Clinical Lung Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of lung cancer. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to lung cancer. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.
期刊最新文献
Computer Assisted Nodule Analysis and Risk Yield is Associated With Occult Lymph Node Status in Clinical Stage I-IIA Lung Adenocarcinoma Undergoing Resection. Histologic Transformation of ALK-Rearranged Lung Adenocarcinomas to High-Grade LCNEC: Clinical and Molecular Description of Three Cases. Impact of Lung Biomarker Testing on Out-Of-Pocket Costs for Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Editorial Board Table of Contents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1