Person-centered contraceptive counseling and associations with contraceptive practices among a nationally representative sample of women in Ethiopia

Q2 Medicine Contraception: X Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.conx.2024.100114
Celia Karp , Shira Tikofsky , Solomon Shiferaw , Assefa Seme , Mahari Yihdego , Linnea Zimmerman
{"title":"Person-centered contraceptive counseling and associations with contraceptive practices among a nationally representative sample of women in Ethiopia","authors":"Celia Karp ,&nbsp;Shira Tikofsky ,&nbsp;Solomon Shiferaw ,&nbsp;Assefa Seme ,&nbsp;Mahari Yihdego ,&nbsp;Linnea Zimmerman","doi":"10.1016/j.conx.2024.100114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To estimate levels of person-centered contraceptive counseling among current and recent contraceptive users, assess for whom counseling differs, and examine the relationship between counseling and contraceptive practices, specifically use of provider-dependent methods and use of one’s preferred method, among women in Ethiopia.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>This cross-sectional study uses nationally representative data collected by the Performance Monitoring for Action Ethiopia project among current and recent contraceptive users (<em>n</em> = 2731) aged 15–49 between October and November 2021. Descriptive analyses estimated person-centered counseling levels via the recently validated quality of contraceptive counseling short scale (QCC-10). Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression estimated associations with contraceptive practices.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Contraceptive users in Ethiopia receive moderate quality counseling (mean QCC-10 score<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->2.69, range: 1.1–4.0) with significant social inequities in the receipt of person-centered care. Women who are younger, uneducated, not in union, from poorer households, or who sourced their method from a non-public facility reported less person-centered care. Strong relationships were observed between higher quality counseling and women’s contraceptive practices. Those receiving highest quality counseling had nearly double the odds of using provider-dependent methods compared to those reporting lowest quality counseling (AOR: 1.92; 95% CI: 1.16–3.18). Among current users, women reporting highest quality counseling had 62% higher odds of using their preferred method relative to women receiving poorest quality care (95% CI: 1.06–2.48).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Poorer quality care is associated with use of non-preferred methods and reliance on provider-independent methods. Efforts to reduce reproductive health disparities and promote contraceptive autonomy should prioritize a person-centered approach to contraceptive counseling for all.</div></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><div>Inequitable delivery of person-centered contraceptive care based on individuals’ sociodemographic characteristics, such as education or marital status, undermines women’s reproductive autonomy and hinders contraceptive experiences. Person-centered contraceptive counseling should be provided to all women in Ethiopia, regardless of their background, to support individuals in achieving their reproductive goals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10655,"journal":{"name":"Contraception: X","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100114"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11667123/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259015162400011X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To estimate levels of person-centered contraceptive counseling among current and recent contraceptive users, assess for whom counseling differs, and examine the relationship between counseling and contraceptive practices, specifically use of provider-dependent methods and use of one’s preferred method, among women in Ethiopia.

Study design

This cross-sectional study uses nationally representative data collected by the Performance Monitoring for Action Ethiopia project among current and recent contraceptive users (n = 2731) aged 15–49 between October and November 2021. Descriptive analyses estimated person-centered counseling levels via the recently validated quality of contraceptive counseling short scale (QCC-10). Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression estimated associations with contraceptive practices.

Results

Contraceptive users in Ethiopia receive moderate quality counseling (mean QCC-10 score = 2.69, range: 1.1–4.0) with significant social inequities in the receipt of person-centered care. Women who are younger, uneducated, not in union, from poorer households, or who sourced their method from a non-public facility reported less person-centered care. Strong relationships were observed between higher quality counseling and women’s contraceptive practices. Those receiving highest quality counseling had nearly double the odds of using provider-dependent methods compared to those reporting lowest quality counseling (AOR: 1.92; 95% CI: 1.16–3.18). Among current users, women reporting highest quality counseling had 62% higher odds of using their preferred method relative to women receiving poorest quality care (95% CI: 1.06–2.48).

Conclusion

Poorer quality care is associated with use of non-preferred methods and reliance on provider-independent methods. Efforts to reduce reproductive health disparities and promote contraceptive autonomy should prioritize a person-centered approach to contraceptive counseling for all.

Implications

Inequitable delivery of person-centered contraceptive care based on individuals’ sociodemographic characteristics, such as education or marital status, undermines women’s reproductive autonomy and hinders contraceptive experiences. Person-centered contraceptive counseling should be provided to all women in Ethiopia, regardless of their background, to support individuals in achieving their reproductive goals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在埃塞俄比亚具有全国代表性的妇女样本中,以人为本的避孕咨询和与避孕做法的联系。
目标:估算目前和近期避孕药具使用者接受以人为本的避孕咨询的水平,评估对哪些人提供不同的咨询,并研究咨询与避孕方法(特别是使用依赖于提供者的方法和使用个人偏好的方法)之间的关系:这项横断面研究使用的是埃塞俄比亚 "绩效监测促进行动 "项目在 2021 年 10 月至 11 月期间收集的具有全国代表性的数据,对象是年龄在 15-49 岁之间的现有和近期避孕药具使用者(n = 2731)。描述性分析通过最近验证的避孕咨询质量简易量表(QCC-10)估算了以人为本的咨询水平。二变量和多变量逻辑回归估计了与避孕措施的关联:结果:埃塞俄比亚的避孕者接受的咨询质量一般(QCC-10 平均分 = 2.69,范围:1.1-4.0),在接受以人为本的护理方面存在严重的社会不平等。年龄较小、未受过教育、未同居、来自贫困家庭或在非公立机构使用避孕药具的妇女所接受的以人为本的护理较少。据观察,较高质量的咨询与妇女的避孕措施之间存在密切关系。与接受最低质量咨询的妇女相比,接受最高质量咨询的妇女使用依赖于提供者的避孕方法的几率几乎是后者的两倍(AOR:1.92;95% CI:1.16-3.18)。在目前的使用者中,接受过最高质量咨询的妇女使用其首选方法的几率比接受最差质量护理的妇女高出 62%(95% CI:1.06-2.48):结论:较差的医疗质量与使用非首选方法和依赖医疗服务提供者的方法有关。减少生殖健康差异和促进避孕自主权的努力应优先考虑以人为本的避孕咨询方法:根据个人的社会人口特征(如受教育程度或婚姻状况)提供以人为本的不公平避孕护理,会损害妇女的生殖自主权,并阻碍避孕体验。以人为本的避孕咨询应提供给埃塞俄比亚的所有妇女,无论其背景如何,以支持个人实现其生殖目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Contraception: X
Contraception: X Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Outpatient medical management of later second trimester abortion (18–23.6 weeks) with procedural evacuation backup: A large case series Experiences of delay-causing obstacles and mental health at the time of abortion seeking Maximizing the effectiveness of 1.5 mg levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: The case for precoital use How does person-centered maternity care relate to postpartum contraceptive counseling and use? Evidence from a longitudinal study of women delivering at health facilities in Ethiopia Dilation and evacuation versus medication abortion at 15–24 weeks of gestation in low-middle income country: A retrospective cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1