Adjuvant therapy with pembrolizumab in renal cell carcinoma: real-world experiences from a retrospective, multi-institutional cohort.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Urologia Internationalis Pub Date : 2024-12-24 DOI:10.1159/000543278
Angelika Mattigk, Cristina Cano Garcia, Niklas Klümper, Alexander Cox, Oliver Hahn, Kerstin Junker, Kati Erdmann, Philipp Schmucker, Luka Flegar, Friedemann Zengerling, Severine Banek, Jörg Ellinger, Bjoern Thorben Buerk, Johannes Huber, Charis Kalogirou, Philip Zeuschner, Benedikt Hoeh
{"title":"Adjuvant therapy with pembrolizumab in renal cell carcinoma: real-world experiences from a retrospective, multi-institutional cohort.","authors":"Angelika Mattigk, Cristina Cano Garcia, Niklas Klümper, Alexander Cox, Oliver Hahn, Kerstin Junker, Kati Erdmann, Philipp Schmucker, Luka Flegar, Friedemann Zengerling, Severine Banek, Jörg Ellinger, Bjoern Thorben Buerk, Johannes Huber, Charis Kalogirou, Philip Zeuschner, Benedikt Hoeh","doi":"10.1159/000543278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Adjuvant pembrolizumab versus placebo significantly improved disease-free survival (DFS) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients at high risk of recurrence following nephrectomy in KEYNOTE-564 trial (NCT03142334). The objective of this study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of adjuvant pembrolizumab in a real-world setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicenter retrospective study, RCC patients receiving adjuvant pembrolizumab between 01/22 and 10/23 at seven tertiary referral centers were included. DFS and treatment safety were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>52 patients with RCC were included. 24 (46%), 5 (9.6 %), 22 (42%) and 1 (1.9%) patients were classified as intermediate to high risk (IR to HR), high risk (HR), M1 with no evidence of disease (M1NED) and unknown. At a median follow-up of 6 months, DFS rates at 6 months were 64.2% in the overall cohort. In subgroup analyses, M1NED patients demonstrated significantly lower DFS compared to non-metastatic (combined: IR to HR/ HR) patients (log rank: p=0.025). Regarding toxicity, grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 26% of patients. Treatment discontinuations were reported in 20% of the patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Recurrence rates in the M1NED group remained high and occurred earlier in our real-world compared to KEYNOTE-564. Long-term toxicities were comparable to clinical trials data.</p>","PeriodicalId":23414,"journal":{"name":"Urologia Internationalis","volume":" ","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia Internationalis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543278","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Adjuvant pembrolizumab versus placebo significantly improved disease-free survival (DFS) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients at high risk of recurrence following nephrectomy in KEYNOTE-564 trial (NCT03142334). The objective of this study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of adjuvant pembrolizumab in a real-world setting.

Methods: In this multicenter retrospective study, RCC patients receiving adjuvant pembrolizumab between 01/22 and 10/23 at seven tertiary referral centers were included. DFS and treatment safety were assessed.

Results: 52 patients with RCC were included. 24 (46%), 5 (9.6 %), 22 (42%) and 1 (1.9%) patients were classified as intermediate to high risk (IR to HR), high risk (HR), M1 with no evidence of disease (M1NED) and unknown. At a median follow-up of 6 months, DFS rates at 6 months were 64.2% in the overall cohort. In subgroup analyses, M1NED patients demonstrated significantly lower DFS compared to non-metastatic (combined: IR to HR/ HR) patients (log rank: p=0.025). Regarding toxicity, grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 26% of patients. Treatment discontinuations were reported in 20% of the patients.

Conclusion: Recurrence rates in the M1NED group remained high and occurred earlier in our real-world compared to KEYNOTE-564. Long-term toxicities were comparable to clinical trials data.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Urologia Internationalis
Urologia Internationalis 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
94
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Concise but fully substantiated international reports of clinically oriented research into science and current management of urogenital disorders form the nucleus of original as well as basic research papers. These are supplemented by up-to-date reviews by international experts on the state-of-the-art of key topics of clinical urological practice. Essential topics receiving regular coverage include the introduction of new techniques and instrumentation as well as the evaluation of new functional tests and diagnostic methods. Special attention is given to advances in surgical techniques and clinical oncology. The regular publication of selected case reports represents the great variation in urological disease and illustrates treatment solutions in singular cases.
期刊最新文献
Auto-expandable metallic ureteral stents for complex ureteral stenosis: long term outcomes in a tertiary institution. Adjuvant therapy with pembrolizumab in renal cell carcinoma: real-world experiences from a retrospective, multi-institutional cohort. Does time matter in early radical cystectomy? Comparing outcome, clinical and pathological characteristics of immediate versus deferred radical cystectomy. Spinal anesthesia vs general anesthesia in the endoscopic management of proximal ureteral stones: A critical evaluation focusing on the total anesthesia time. Discrimination of T-stage using tumor weight and size - a potential approach to guide perioperative decision making in patients with bladder cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1