Stretching after spinal cord injury: a call for evidence for this common clinical practice.

IF 1.3 Q3 REHABILITATION Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences Pub Date : 2024-12-10 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fresc.2024.1505439
Todd E Williams, Louis A DeMark, Tinuade A Olarewaju, Kelly A Hawkins, Emily J Fox
{"title":"Stretching after spinal cord injury: a call for evidence for this common clinical practice.","authors":"Todd E Williams, Louis A DeMark, Tinuade A Olarewaju, Kelly A Hawkins, Emily J Fox","doi":"10.3389/fresc.2024.1505439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stretching is a ubiquitous rehabilitation intervention for individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI), intended to reduce spasticity, maintain or improve joint range of motion, and prevent joint contractures. Although people with SCI report that stretching is their preferred approach to reduce spasticity, limited evidence supports the use of stretching for people with SCI, including short-term (< one hour) effects on spasticity. Further, the long-term effects and the effects of stretching on motor function have yet to be examined in humans with SCI. Evidence from pre-clinical studies in rats with SCI demonstrates that stretching impairs motor output, reduces spinal cord excitability, and abolishes walking function. This perspective paper discusses evidence of static stretching in humans and rats with SCI regarding the effects on range of motion, joint contractures, and effects on voluntary and involuntary (i.e., spasticity) motor output. Additionally, we aim to challenge assumptions regarding the use of stretching and encourage research to advance the understanding of this common rehabilitation approach. Research is needed to investigate underlying mechanisms of stretch-induced effects and to advance stretching protocols to optimize the potential beneficial effects of stretching for people with SCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":73102,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","volume":"5 ","pages":"1505439"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11666664/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2024.1505439","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stretching is a ubiquitous rehabilitation intervention for individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI), intended to reduce spasticity, maintain or improve joint range of motion, and prevent joint contractures. Although people with SCI report that stretching is their preferred approach to reduce spasticity, limited evidence supports the use of stretching for people with SCI, including short-term (< one hour) effects on spasticity. Further, the long-term effects and the effects of stretching on motor function have yet to be examined in humans with SCI. Evidence from pre-clinical studies in rats with SCI demonstrates that stretching impairs motor output, reduces spinal cord excitability, and abolishes walking function. This perspective paper discusses evidence of static stretching in humans and rats with SCI regarding the effects on range of motion, joint contractures, and effects on voluntary and involuntary (i.e., spasticity) motor output. Additionally, we aim to challenge assumptions regarding the use of stretching and encourage research to advance the understanding of this common rehabilitation approach. Research is needed to investigate underlying mechanisms of stretch-induced effects and to advance stretching protocols to optimize the potential beneficial effects of stretching for people with SCI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脊髓损伤后的拉伸:呼吁为这种常见的临床实践提供证据。
拉伸是脊髓损伤(SCI)患者普遍采用的康复干预措施,旨在减少痉挛,维持或改善关节活动范围,防止关节挛缩。尽管脊髓损伤患者报告说拉伸是他们减少痉挛的首选方法,但有限的证据支持拉伸对脊髓损伤患者的使用,包括短期(< 1小时)的痉挛效果。此外,对脊髓损伤患者的长期影响和拉伸对运动功能的影响还有待研究。来自脊髓损伤大鼠临床前研究的证据表明,拉伸损害运动输出,降低脊髓兴奋性,并消除行走功能。这篇前瞻性的论文讨论了脊髓损伤患者和大鼠的静态拉伸对运动范围、关节收缩以及对自主和非自主(即痉挛)运动输出的影响的证据。此外,我们的目标是挑战关于使用拉伸的假设,并鼓励研究以促进对这种常见康复方法的理解。需要研究拉伸诱导效应的潜在机制,并改进拉伸方案,以优化拉伸对脊髓损伤患者的潜在有益作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Case Report: Rehabilitation of a giant meniscus cyst with a mixed tear. Preliminary development and evaluation of a mechanical handwriting assistive device to support individuals with movement disorders. Caregiver perceptions of usual care home programs for persons with acquired brain injury: a qualitative descriptive study. Underutilization of coper/non-coper screening in anterior cruciate ligament injuries management in Italy: an online survey. Validation of a tri-axial accelerometer for measuring physical activity in patients with subacute stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1