Potential impact of obstetric history on postmenopausal fragility fracture risk: A reassessment of the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool.

IF 1.9 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Joint diseases and related surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-02 Epub Date: 2024-12-09 DOI:10.52312/jdrs.2025.1995
Aydan Sezgin, Huriye Güvenç Saçıntı, Elşad Osmanlı, Kübra Mangır, Koray Görkem Saçıntı, Erdem Aras Sezgin
{"title":"Potential impact of obstetric history on postmenopausal fragility fracture risk: A reassessment of the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool.","authors":"Aydan Sezgin, Huriye Güvenç Saçıntı, Elşad Osmanlı, Kübra Mangır, Koray Görkem Saçıntı, Erdem Aras Sezgin","doi":"10.52312/jdrs.2025.1995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the impact of integrating obstetric parameters into the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) on the precision of risk assessment.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, patients who experienced postmenopausal fragility fractures of the distal radius, proximal femur, or lumbar vertebrae between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2023, were included. Obstetric histories, along with standard FRAX parameters, were obtained by phone interviews. Based on the FRAX major osteoporotic fracture risk score calculated without bone mineral density, patients were classified into high-, intermediate-, and low-risk group categories. Differences in age at menarche, age at menopause, lactation duration, gravidity, and parity were analyzed across risk categories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 328 patients (mean age: 64.5±5.8 years; range, 55 to 75 years) were included. The mean FRAX score was 16±8.8 (range, 3 to 58), and 85, 191, and 52 patients were classified as high-, intermediate-, and low-risk, respectively. A positive correlation was observed between FRAX scores and both later age at menarche and earlier menopause (p<0.001 and p=0.008, respectively). The mean age at menopause was significantly different between the high- and low-risk groups (46.4 vs. 49.3 years, p=0.016). The intermediate-risk group was also evaluated, showing no significant differences in obstetric parameters compared to the low-risk group (p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although late menarche is not explicitly included in FRAX, its association with higher fracture risk was evident. The established influence of early menopause on FRAX scores supports its role in fracture risk estimation. However, the inclusion of additional obstetric parameters did not enhance the predictive accuracy of FRAX in this cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":73560,"journal":{"name":"Joint diseases and related surgery","volume":"36 1","pages":"142-147"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11734845/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Joint diseases and related surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52312/jdrs.2025.1995","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of integrating obstetric parameters into the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) on the precision of risk assessment.

Patients and methods: In this retrospective study, patients who experienced postmenopausal fragility fractures of the distal radius, proximal femur, or lumbar vertebrae between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2023, were included. Obstetric histories, along with standard FRAX parameters, were obtained by phone interviews. Based on the FRAX major osteoporotic fracture risk score calculated without bone mineral density, patients were classified into high-, intermediate-, and low-risk group categories. Differences in age at menarche, age at menopause, lactation duration, gravidity, and parity were analyzed across risk categories.

Results: A total of 328 patients (mean age: 64.5±5.8 years; range, 55 to 75 years) were included. The mean FRAX score was 16±8.8 (range, 3 to 58), and 85, 191, and 52 patients were classified as high-, intermediate-, and low-risk, respectively. A positive correlation was observed between FRAX scores and both later age at menarche and earlier menopause (p<0.001 and p=0.008, respectively). The mean age at menopause was significantly different between the high- and low-risk groups (46.4 vs. 49.3 years, p=0.016). The intermediate-risk group was also evaluated, showing no significant differences in obstetric parameters compared to the low-risk group (p>0.05).

Conclusion: Although late menarche is not explicitly included in FRAX, its association with higher fracture risk was evident. The established influence of early menopause on FRAX scores supports its role in fracture risk estimation. However, the inclusion of additional obstetric parameters did not enhance the predictive accuracy of FRAX in this cohort.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
产科史对绝经后脆性骨折风险的潜在影响:对骨折风险评估工具的重新评估。
目的:本研究旨在评估将产科参数纳入骨折风险评估工具(FRAX)对风险评估精度的影响。患者和方法:在这项回顾性研究中,纳入了在2021年1月1日至2023年12月31日期间经历过绝经后桡骨远端、股骨近端或腰椎脆性骨折的患者。通过电话访问获得产科病史以及标准FRAX参数。根据不计骨密度计算的FRAX主要骨质疏松性骨折风险评分,将患者分为高、中、低危组。初潮年龄、停经年龄、哺乳期持续时间、妊娠和胎次在不同风险类别中的差异进行了分析。结果:共328例患者(平均年龄:64.5±5.8岁;范围,55至75岁)。平均FRAX评分为16±8.8(范围3 ~ 58),85例、191例和52例患者分别被划分为高危、中危和低危。FRAX评分与初潮年龄和绝经年龄均呈正相关(p0.05)。结论:虽然月经初潮晚未明确包括在FRAX中,但其与较高骨折风险的关联是明显的。早绝经对FRAX评分的既定影响支持其在骨折风险评估中的作用。然而,纳入额外的产科参数并没有提高FRAX在该队列中的预测准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Balancing strength and sterility: An in vitro assessment of the mechanical and antibacterial properties of bone cement loaded with various antibiotics. Bicortical screw placement and microdamage in medial buttress plates in the management of Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures: A scanning electron microscopy-based analysis. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of arthroscopic repair versus conservative management for medial meniscus posterior root tears: A comparative cohort study. Clinical efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopy for thoracic ossification of ligamentum flavum: A systematic review. Clinical efficacy of robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty for developmental dysplasia of the hip: A meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1