Narat Srivali, Federica De Giacomi, Teng Moua, Jay H Ryu
{"title":"Corticosteroid therapy for treating acute exacerbation of interstitial lung diseases: a systematic review","authors":"Narat Srivali, Federica De Giacomi, Teng Moua, Jay H Ryu","doi":"10.1136/thorax-2024-222636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease (AE-ILD) often results in death and poses significant challenges in clinical management. While corticosteroids are frequently employed, the optimal regimen and their clinical efficacy remain uncertain. To address this knowledge gap, we undertook a systematic review to evaluate the impact of steroid therapy on clinical outcomes in patients experiencing AE-ILD. Method Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we systematically searched multiple databases, identifying 12 454 articles. After removing duplicates and screening titles and abstracts, 447 articles were selected for full-text review. Ultimately, nine studies met inclusion criteria, comparing high-dose corticosteroids with low-dose or non-steroidal interventions in treating AE-ILD. Key outcomes included in-hospital and long-term mortality, as well as AE recurrence. Results Analysis of nine studies (total n=18 509) revealed differential treatment effects based on the ILD subtype. In non-idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) ILD, high-dose corticosteroid therapy (>1.0 mg/kg prednisolone) demonstrated improved survival (adjusted HR 0.221, 95% CI 0.102 to 0.480, p<0.001) and reduced 90-day mortality. Early tapering of high-dose corticosteroids (>10% reduction within 2 weeks) reduced in-hospital mortality (adjusted HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.99). Higher cumulative doses in the first 30 days (5185±2414 mg/month vs 3133±1990 mg/month) were associated with lower recurrence rates (adjusted HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.90, p=0.02). In IPF patients, however, high-dose therapy showed inconsistent benefits, with some studies reporting increased mortality risk (OR 1.075, 95% CI 1.044 to 1.107, p<0.001). Conclusion This review emphasises the potential benefits of individualised treatment approaches for AE-ILD but highlights the need for caution in making definitive recommendations. Although high-dose corticosteroids may show promise, particularly in non-IPF cases, the current evidence is inconsistent, and the lack of robust supporting literature makes it difficult to draw firm conclusions. Further research through randomised controlled trials is necessary to refine and optimise therapeutic strategies for AE-ILD. Data sharing not applicable as no datasets generated and/or analysed for this study.","PeriodicalId":23284,"journal":{"name":"Thorax","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thorax","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2024-222636","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction Acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease (AE-ILD) often results in death and poses significant challenges in clinical management. While corticosteroids are frequently employed, the optimal regimen and their clinical efficacy remain uncertain. To address this knowledge gap, we undertook a systematic review to evaluate the impact of steroid therapy on clinical outcomes in patients experiencing AE-ILD. Method Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we systematically searched multiple databases, identifying 12 454 articles. After removing duplicates and screening titles and abstracts, 447 articles were selected for full-text review. Ultimately, nine studies met inclusion criteria, comparing high-dose corticosteroids with low-dose or non-steroidal interventions in treating AE-ILD. Key outcomes included in-hospital and long-term mortality, as well as AE recurrence. Results Analysis of nine studies (total n=18 509) revealed differential treatment effects based on the ILD subtype. In non-idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) ILD, high-dose corticosteroid therapy (>1.0 mg/kg prednisolone) demonstrated improved survival (adjusted HR 0.221, 95% CI 0.102 to 0.480, p<0.001) and reduced 90-day mortality. Early tapering of high-dose corticosteroids (>10% reduction within 2 weeks) reduced in-hospital mortality (adjusted HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.99). Higher cumulative doses in the first 30 days (5185±2414 mg/month vs 3133±1990 mg/month) were associated with lower recurrence rates (adjusted HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.90, p=0.02). In IPF patients, however, high-dose therapy showed inconsistent benefits, with some studies reporting increased mortality risk (OR 1.075, 95% CI 1.044 to 1.107, p<0.001). Conclusion This review emphasises the potential benefits of individualised treatment approaches for AE-ILD but highlights the need for caution in making definitive recommendations. Although high-dose corticosteroids may show promise, particularly in non-IPF cases, the current evidence is inconsistent, and the lack of robust supporting literature makes it difficult to draw firm conclusions. Further research through randomised controlled trials is necessary to refine and optimise therapeutic strategies for AE-ILD. Data sharing not applicable as no datasets generated and/or analysed for this study.
期刊介绍:
Thorax stands as one of the premier respiratory medicine journals globally, featuring clinical and experimental research articles spanning respiratory medicine, pediatrics, immunology, pharmacology, pathology, and surgery. The journal's mission is to publish noteworthy advancements in scientific understanding that are poised to influence clinical practice significantly. This encompasses articles delving into basic and translational mechanisms applicable to clinical material, covering areas such as cell and molecular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and immunology.