Supply chain digitalization and energy efficiency (gas and oil): How do they contribute to achieving carbon neutrality targets?

IF 14.2 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Energy Economics Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108140
Wei Wu , Shuochen Bi , Yunqiu Zhan , Xiao Gu
{"title":"Supply chain digitalization and energy efficiency (gas and oil): How do they contribute to achieving carbon neutrality targets?","authors":"Wei Wu ,&nbsp;Shuochen Bi ,&nbsp;Yunqiu Zhan ,&nbsp;Xiao Gu","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Considering the global awareness regarding the issue of climate change and global warming, several nations, including the United States, are focusing on achieving carbon neutrality goals. In doing so, this study examines how supply chain digitalization, green technologies, and energy efficiency influence greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the United States. This is the first empirical study evaluating how supply chain digitalization and energy efficiency influence GHG emissions, thus filling the gap in the literature. The study applied several quantile-based techniques, including wavelet quantile regression, quantile causality, and quantile regressions, as robustness checks used data spanning the period between 2000Q<sub>1</sub> to 2022Q<sub>4</sub>. The results show that (i) across all periods and quantiles, a surge in supply chain digitalization intensifies GHG emissions in the United States; (ii) across all periods and quantiles, energy efficiency (oil and gas) lessens GHG emissions; (iii) across all periods and quantiles economic growth and financial globalization mitigate GHG emissions; and (iv) all the regressors can significantly predict GHG emissions. Based on these findings, policymakers in the United States should prioritize investments in green technologies and energy efficiency improvements, offering tax incentives, grants, and subsidies to businesses that adopt such practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"142 ","pages":"Article 108140"},"PeriodicalIF":14.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988324008491","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Considering the global awareness regarding the issue of climate change and global warming, several nations, including the United States, are focusing on achieving carbon neutrality goals. In doing so, this study examines how supply chain digitalization, green technologies, and energy efficiency influence greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the United States. This is the first empirical study evaluating how supply chain digitalization and energy efficiency influence GHG emissions, thus filling the gap in the literature. The study applied several quantile-based techniques, including wavelet quantile regression, quantile causality, and quantile regressions, as robustness checks used data spanning the period between 2000Q1 to 2022Q4. The results show that (i) across all periods and quantiles, a surge in supply chain digitalization intensifies GHG emissions in the United States; (ii) across all periods and quantiles, energy efficiency (oil and gas) lessens GHG emissions; (iii) across all periods and quantiles economic growth and financial globalization mitigate GHG emissions; and (iv) all the regressors can significantly predict GHG emissions. Based on these findings, policymakers in the United States should prioritize investments in green technologies and energy efficiency improvements, offering tax incentives, grants, and subsidies to businesses that adopt such practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
供应链数字化和能源效率(天然气和石油):它们如何有助于实现碳中和目标?
考虑到全球对气候变化和全球变暖问题的认识,包括美国在内的一些国家正致力于实现碳中和目标。在此过程中,本研究考察了供应链数字化、绿色技术和能源效率如何影响美国的温室气体(GHG)排放。这是第一个评估供应链数字化和能源效率如何影响温室气体排放的实证研究,从而填补了文献的空白。该研究应用了几种基于分位数的技术,包括小波分位数回归、分位数因果关系和分位数回归,作为稳健性检查,使用了2000年第一季度至2022Q4之间的数据。结果表明:(i)在所有时期和分位数中,供应链数字化的激增加剧了美国的温室气体排放;(ii)在所有时期和分位数中,能源效率(石油和天然气)减少了温室气体排放;(iii)在所有时期和分位数中,经济增长和金融全球化减缓了温室气体排放;(4)所有回归量均能显著预测温室气体排放。基于这些发现,美国的政策制定者应优先投资绿色技术和提高能源效率,为采用此类做法的企业提供税收激励、赠款和补贴。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Economics
Energy Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
524
期刊介绍: Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.
期刊最新文献
Directed technical change and the potential fossil fuel technology trap Does geopolitical risk shape energy consumption and carbon emissions? The role of technology innovation and energy security Kickstarting Carbon Capture and Storage adoption: Tailoring subsidies to emitters’ needs Climate target announcements as catalysts for artificial intelligence advancement Cleaner bills, cleaner air: The environmental co-benefits of stringent renewable portfolio standards policy design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1