The impact of political risks on carbon emissions

IF 14.2 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Energy Economics Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108130
Jin Boon Wong (Jeffrey), Qin Zhang
{"title":"The impact of political risks on carbon emissions","authors":"Jin Boon Wong (Jeffrey),&nbsp;Qin Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We investigate the impact of firm-level political risks on carbon emissions. Our results show that companies decrease their total emission footprint in response to higher political risks. However, this is driven predominantly by the reduction of scope 2 emissions, which “involves purchased energy consumed by the firm.” With increasing policymakers, investors, and stakeholders' emphasis on positive climate change actions, our findings indicate that corporations may view reducing carbon emissions as an efficient strategy to draw attention away from higher political risks. Further analyses reveal that this tactic is adopted mainly by resource-constrained companies that are smaller, underperforming, with lower cash reserves and cashflow from operations. Using a channel test, we also provide empirical evidence that reducing scope 2 emissions in response to higher political risks may have helped firms avoid lower market valuation. Our findings are robust to a series of sensitivity and endogeneity checks. Overall, this study advances the literature by highlighting the interplay between politics and carbon emission in an increasingly climate change-focused environment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"141 ","pages":"Article 108130"},"PeriodicalIF":14.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988324008399","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We investigate the impact of firm-level political risks on carbon emissions. Our results show that companies decrease their total emission footprint in response to higher political risks. However, this is driven predominantly by the reduction of scope 2 emissions, which “involves purchased energy consumed by the firm.” With increasing policymakers, investors, and stakeholders' emphasis on positive climate change actions, our findings indicate that corporations may view reducing carbon emissions as an efficient strategy to draw attention away from higher political risks. Further analyses reveal that this tactic is adopted mainly by resource-constrained companies that are smaller, underperforming, with lower cash reserves and cashflow from operations. Using a channel test, we also provide empirical evidence that reducing scope 2 emissions in response to higher political risks may have helped firms avoid lower market valuation. Our findings are robust to a series of sensitivity and endogeneity checks. Overall, this study advances the literature by highlighting the interplay between politics and carbon emission in an increasingly climate change-focused environment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
政治风险对碳排放的影响
我们研究了企业层面的政治风险对碳排放的影响。我们的研究结果表明,企业在应对更高的政治风险时减少了总排放足迹。然而,这主要是由第2类排放的减少所推动的,这“涉及到公司所消耗的购买能源”。随着政策制定者、投资者和利益相关者越来越重视积极的气候变化行动,我们的研究结果表明,企业可能会将减少碳排放视为一种有效的策略,以转移人们对更高政治风险的注意力。进一步的分析表明,这种策略主要被资源受限的公司采用,这些公司规模较小,表现不佳,现金储备和运营现金流较低。通过渠道测试,我们还提供了经验证据,表明减少范围2排放以应对较高的政治风险可能有助于企业避免较低的市场估值。我们的发现是稳健的一系列敏感性和内生性检查。总体而言,本研究通过强调在日益关注气候变化的环境中政治与碳排放之间的相互作用来推进文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Economics
Energy Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
524
期刊介绍: Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.
期刊最新文献
Directed technical change and the potential fossil fuel technology trap Does geopolitical risk shape energy consumption and carbon emissions? The role of technology innovation and energy security Kickstarting Carbon Capture and Storage adoption: Tailoring subsidies to emitters’ needs Climate target announcements as catalysts for artificial intelligence advancement Cleaner bills, cleaner air: The environmental co-benefits of stringent renewable portfolio standards policy design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1