Not a pipeline but a highway: Men's and women's STEM career trajectories from age 13 to 25

IF 5.2 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Journal of Vocational Behavior Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jvb.2024.104067
Yannan Gao , Jacquelynne S. Eccles , Anna-Lena Dicke
{"title":"Not a pipeline but a highway: Men's and women's STEM career trajectories from age 13 to 25","authors":"Yannan Gao ,&nbsp;Jacquelynne S. Eccles ,&nbsp;Anna-Lena Dicke","doi":"10.1016/j.jvb.2024.104067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Concerns with diversifying and expanding the STEM workforce have elicited extensive efforts to increase women's adherence to a “no leak pipeline” to match that of men. However, is such a trajectory optimal for boosting women's STEM career attainment? If so, among which types of STEM occupations? Studies often suggested that women are underrepresented in the pipeline of “white-collar”, mathematical, engineering, physical, and computer science (MEPCS) occupations, but to what extent does this conclusion hold true among other types of STEM careers? To answer these questions, we plotted men's and women's STEM career trajectories from age 13 to 25 using a U.S. national longitudinal sample and categorized occupations by domain-specific knowledge (i.e., non-STEM, MEPCS, or LEHMS [life, ecological, health and medical sciences]) and by educational requirement (i.e., “blue-collar” non-STEM, \"blue-collar\" STEM, \"white-collar\" non-STEM, or “white-collar” STEM). We found gender similarities in STEM attrition, gender differences in STEM entry, and gender differences in STEM career attainment trajectories. For example, STEM workers rarely took a “no leak pipeline”, except women in LEHMS occupations. Moreover, tracking the size of STEM workforce longitudinally, we found that though small, women's MEPCS workforce expanded to nearly twice its size as participants grew from age 13 to 25; in contrast, the LEHMS workforce shrank to less than a third of its size among both men and women. Our results specify aspects in which STEM trajectories of men and women differ across various types of STEM occupations and thus provide an updated understanding of gendered STEM career trajectories.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51344,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vocational Behavior","volume":"156 ","pages":"Article 104067"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vocational Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001879124001088","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Concerns with diversifying and expanding the STEM workforce have elicited extensive efforts to increase women's adherence to a “no leak pipeline” to match that of men. However, is such a trajectory optimal for boosting women's STEM career attainment? If so, among which types of STEM occupations? Studies often suggested that women are underrepresented in the pipeline of “white-collar”, mathematical, engineering, physical, and computer science (MEPCS) occupations, but to what extent does this conclusion hold true among other types of STEM careers? To answer these questions, we plotted men's and women's STEM career trajectories from age 13 to 25 using a U.S. national longitudinal sample and categorized occupations by domain-specific knowledge (i.e., non-STEM, MEPCS, or LEHMS [life, ecological, health and medical sciences]) and by educational requirement (i.e., “blue-collar” non-STEM, "blue-collar" STEM, "white-collar" non-STEM, or “white-collar” STEM). We found gender similarities in STEM attrition, gender differences in STEM entry, and gender differences in STEM career attainment trajectories. For example, STEM workers rarely took a “no leak pipeline”, except women in LEHMS occupations. Moreover, tracking the size of STEM workforce longitudinally, we found that though small, women's MEPCS workforce expanded to nearly twice its size as participants grew from age 13 to 25; in contrast, the LEHMS workforce shrank to less than a third of its size among both men and women. Our results specify aspects in which STEM trajectories of men and women differ across various types of STEM occupations and thus provide an updated understanding of gendered STEM career trajectories.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不是管道,而是高速公路:男性和女性从13岁到25岁的STEM职业轨迹
对多样化和扩大STEM劳动力的关注引发了广泛的努力,以提高女性对“无泄漏管道”的遵守程度,以匹配男性。然而,这样的发展轨迹对于提高女性在STEM领域的职业成就来说是最佳的吗?如果有,包括哪些类型的STEM职业?研究经常表明,女性在“白领”、数学、工程、物理和计算机科学(MEPCS)职业中的代表性不足,但这一结论在多大程度上适用于其他类型的STEM职业?为了回答这些问题,我们使用美国全国纵向样本绘制了男性和女性从13岁到25岁的STEM职业轨迹,并根据领域特定知识(即非STEM, MEPCS或LEHMS[生命,生态,健康和医学科学])和教育要求(即“蓝领”非STEM,“蓝领”STEM,“白领”非STEM或“白领”STEM)对职业进行了分类。我们发现STEM人员流失的性别相似,STEM入职的性别差异,以及STEM职业成就轨迹的性别差异。例如,STEM工作者很少采取“无泄漏管道”,除了LEHMS职业的女性。此外,纵向跟踪STEM劳动力的规模,我们发现,尽管规模很小,但随着参与者从13岁增长到25岁,女性的MEPCS劳动力规模扩大了近一倍;相比之下,LEHMS的男性和女性劳动力都缩减到不到其规模的三分之一。我们的研究结果明确了在不同类型的STEM职业中,男性和女性的STEM轨迹不同的方面,从而提供了对性别化STEM职业轨迹的最新理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vocational Behavior
Journal of Vocational Behavior PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
5.40%
发文量
85
期刊介绍: The Journal of Vocational Behavior publishes original empirical and theoretical articles offering unique insights into the realms of career choice, career development, and work adjustment across the lifespan. These contributions are not only valuable for academic exploration but also find applications in counseling and career development programs across diverse sectors such as colleges, universities, business, industry, government, and the military. The primary focus of the journal centers on individual decision-making regarding work and careers, prioritizing investigations into personal career choices rather than organizational or employer-level variables. Example topics encompass a broad range, from initial career choices (e.g., choice of major, initial work or organization selection, organizational attraction) to the development of a career, work transitions, work-family management, and attitudes within the workplace (such as work commitment, multiple role management, and turnover).
期刊最新文献
Sense of belonging in hybrid work settings Crafting the road to well-being for precarious frontline workers: Explicating the role of jolts and resources Editorial Board Supervisor resilience promotes employee well-being: The role of resource crossover Employees' affective commitment to multiple work-related targets: A longitudinal person-centered investigation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1