{"title":"Emerging Research Trends in River Health Assessment: A Bibliometric Analysis","authors":"Amit Kumar Tiwari, Rinku Singh, Sanoj Kumar Patel, Sudhanshu Kumar, Nazuk Bhasin, Anil Barla, Gopal Shankar Singh","doi":"10.1007/s44177-024-00081-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article used bibliometric analysis and uncovered salient features of literature published in the twenty-first century focusing on river health assessment (RHA). We analysed 509 articles related to RHA obtained from the Web of Science (WoS) database from 2002 to 2024. The Bibliometrix package was used in RStudio software for the analysis of several publication characteristics viz. productivity, countries, country collaboration, journals, trending topics, and keyword co-occurrences. Results indicated a steep growth in total publications over the past 23 years. The Republic of China took the top rank out of 25 countries, followed by the USA and India. The largest collaborative research was done by scientists from China, the USA and Iran. The analysis highlighted a concentration of research outputs on river health in various journals, reflecting significant recognition of this area within the scientific community. The results revealed that the majority of RHA investigations have used physico-chemical parameters, but recent years have seen an increased emphasis on using biological factors to assess river health. However, geo-morphological, hydrological, and habitat-based parameters remain underutilized in RHAs. To achieve a comprehensive RHA, it is essential to include these parameters alongside indicators based on ecosystem services and people’s perception. This analysis would assist scientists, policymakers, and river managers by providing a holistic approach and facilitating the development of adequate policies and multifaceted management strategies for riverine ecosystems.</p><h3>Graphical abstract</h3><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":100099,"journal":{"name":"Anthropocene Science","volume":"3 3-4","pages":"157 - 178"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropocene Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44177-024-00081-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article used bibliometric analysis and uncovered salient features of literature published in the twenty-first century focusing on river health assessment (RHA). We analysed 509 articles related to RHA obtained from the Web of Science (WoS) database from 2002 to 2024. The Bibliometrix package was used in RStudio software for the analysis of several publication characteristics viz. productivity, countries, country collaboration, journals, trending topics, and keyword co-occurrences. Results indicated a steep growth in total publications over the past 23 years. The Republic of China took the top rank out of 25 countries, followed by the USA and India. The largest collaborative research was done by scientists from China, the USA and Iran. The analysis highlighted a concentration of research outputs on river health in various journals, reflecting significant recognition of this area within the scientific community. The results revealed that the majority of RHA investigations have used physico-chemical parameters, but recent years have seen an increased emphasis on using biological factors to assess river health. However, geo-morphological, hydrological, and habitat-based parameters remain underutilized in RHAs. To achieve a comprehensive RHA, it is essential to include these parameters alongside indicators based on ecosystem services and people’s perception. This analysis would assist scientists, policymakers, and river managers by providing a holistic approach and facilitating the development of adequate policies and multifaceted management strategies for riverine ecosystems.
本文采用文献计量学分析方法,揭示了21世纪河流健康评价(RHA)相关文献的显著特征。我们分析了2002年至2024年从Web of Science (WoS)数据库中获得的509篇与RHA相关的文章。在RStudio软件中使用Bibliometrix包来分析几个出版特征,即生产力、国家、国家合作、期刊、趋势主题和关键词共现。结果表明,在过去的23年里,总出版物急剧增长。中华民国在25个国家中排名第一,其次是美国和印度。最大的合作研究是由来自中国、美国和伊朗的科学家完成的。该分析强调,各种期刊集中了关于河流健康的研究成果,反映出科学界对这一领域的高度认可。结果表明,大多数RHA调查都使用了物理化学参数,但近年来越来越重视使用生物因素来评估河流健康。然而,地理形态、水文和基于栖息地的参数在区域生态系统中仍未得到充分利用。为了实现全面的RHA,必须将这些参数与基于生态系统服务和人们感知的指标一起纳入。这一分析将为科学家、政策制定者和河流管理者提供一种全面的方法,并促进制定适当的河流生态系统政策和多方面的管理战略。图形抽象