Richard Dein D. Altarez, Armando Apan, Tek Maraseni
{"title":"The perspectives of remote sensing and GIS on military environmental impacts: a systematic review","authors":"Richard Dein D. Altarez, Armando Apan, Tek Maraseni","doi":"10.1007/s10661-024-13514-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Military operations have long been recognized to cause significant environmental consequences. However, research on the environmental impacts of military operations remains fragmented despite the rise of modern technologies, including remote sensing (RS) and geographic information system (GIS). Hence, this study sought to review the literature on using RS and GIS approaches to assess military operations’ environmental impacts. The PRISMA 2009 systematic review process was employed in this research. The eligibility screening of literature involves searching using selected keywords, Boolean operators, and a wild card operator in Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science. This study identified a growing trend in the publication from 2000 to 2024, with an average yearly cumulative percentage of 4.17%. The articles are not limited to RS and GIS journals (22.22%), showing a broader interest across an array of publication domains (33.33%). Further, this study indicates a global interest in the field, with 24 countries contributing to the body of knowledge. Methodologically, assessing the military impact through change detection on land use and land cover (LULC) (55.56%) is the dominant approach, with researchers favoring the combined use of RS and GIS software (79%). Optical sensors (79.49%) with moderate spatial resolution (61.90%) are the preferred imagery types. The impact on the terrestrial environment is widespread (36.84%), often involving the entire armed forces (55.26%). Overall, this review offers information into the role of RS and GIS in assessing the environmental impacts of military operations and understanding the complex nature of the military and the environment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":544,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","volume":"197 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10661-024-13514-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Military operations have long been recognized to cause significant environmental consequences. However, research on the environmental impacts of military operations remains fragmented despite the rise of modern technologies, including remote sensing (RS) and geographic information system (GIS). Hence, this study sought to review the literature on using RS and GIS approaches to assess military operations’ environmental impacts. The PRISMA 2009 systematic review process was employed in this research. The eligibility screening of literature involves searching using selected keywords, Boolean operators, and a wild card operator in Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science. This study identified a growing trend in the publication from 2000 to 2024, with an average yearly cumulative percentage of 4.17%. The articles are not limited to RS and GIS journals (22.22%), showing a broader interest across an array of publication domains (33.33%). Further, this study indicates a global interest in the field, with 24 countries contributing to the body of knowledge. Methodologically, assessing the military impact through change detection on land use and land cover (LULC) (55.56%) is the dominant approach, with researchers favoring the combined use of RS and GIS software (79%). Optical sensors (79.49%) with moderate spatial resolution (61.90%) are the preferred imagery types. The impact on the terrestrial environment is widespread (36.84%), often involving the entire armed forces (55.26%). Overall, this review offers information into the role of RS and GIS in assessing the environmental impacts of military operations and understanding the complex nature of the military and the environment.
人们早就认识到军事行动会造成严重的环境后果。然而,尽管包括遥感(RS)和地理信息系统(GIS)在内的现代技术兴起,但关于军事行动对环境影响的研究仍然零散。因此,本研究试图回顾有关使用RS和GIS方法评估军事行动环境影响的文献。本研究采用PRISMA 2009系统评价流程。文献的资格筛选包括在b谷歌Scholar、Scopus和Web of Science中使用选定的关键字、布尔运算符和通配符进行搜索。研究发现,从2000年到2024年,论文发表量呈增长趋势,年均累积百分比为4.17%。这些文章不局限于RS和GIS期刊(22.22%),在一系列出版领域表现出更广泛的兴趣(33.33%)。此外,这项研究表明全球对该领域的兴趣,有24个国家为知识体系做出了贡献。在方法上,通过土地利用和土地覆盖变化检测(LULC)评估军事影响(55.56%)是主要方法,研究人员倾向于RS和GIS软件的联合使用(79%)。光学传感器(79.49%)和中等空间分辨率(61.90%)是首选的成像类型。对陆地环境的影响是广泛的(36.84%),经常涉及整个武装部队(55.26%)。总的来说,这篇综述为RS和GIS在评估军事行动的环境影响和理解军事和环境的复杂性方面的作用提供了信息。
期刊介绍:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment emphasizes technical developments and data arising from environmental monitoring and assessment, the use of scientific principles in the design of monitoring systems at the local, regional and global scales, and the use of monitoring data in assessing the consequences of natural resource management actions and pollution risks to man and the environment.