The perspectives of remote sensing and GIS on military environmental impacts: a systematic review

IF 2.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Pub Date : 2024-12-30 DOI:10.1007/s10661-024-13514-0
Richard Dein D. Altarez, Armando Apan, Tek Maraseni
{"title":"The perspectives of remote sensing and GIS on military environmental impacts: a systematic review","authors":"Richard Dein D. Altarez,&nbsp;Armando Apan,&nbsp;Tek Maraseni","doi":"10.1007/s10661-024-13514-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Military operations have long been recognized to cause significant environmental consequences. However, research on the environmental impacts of military operations remains fragmented despite the rise of modern technologies, including remote sensing (RS) and geographic information system (GIS). Hence, this study sought to review the literature on using RS and GIS approaches to assess military operations’ environmental impacts. The PRISMA 2009 systematic review process was employed in this research. The eligibility screening of literature involves searching using selected keywords, Boolean operators, and a wild card operator in Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science. This study identified a growing trend in the publication from 2000 to 2024, with an average yearly cumulative percentage of 4.17%. The articles are not limited to RS and GIS journals (22.22%), showing a broader interest across an array of publication domains (33.33%). Further, this study indicates a global interest in the field, with 24 countries contributing to the body of knowledge. Methodologically, assessing the military impact through change detection on land use and land cover (LULC) (55.56%) is the dominant approach, with researchers favoring the combined use of RS and GIS software (79%). Optical sensors (79.49%) with moderate spatial resolution (61.90%) are the preferred imagery types. The impact on the terrestrial environment is widespread (36.84%), often involving the entire armed forces (55.26%). Overall, this review offers information into the role of RS and GIS in assessing the environmental impacts of military operations and understanding the complex nature of the military and the environment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":544,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","volume":"197 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10661-024-13514-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Military operations have long been recognized to cause significant environmental consequences. However, research on the environmental impacts of military operations remains fragmented despite the rise of modern technologies, including remote sensing (RS) and geographic information system (GIS). Hence, this study sought to review the literature on using RS and GIS approaches to assess military operations’ environmental impacts. The PRISMA 2009 systematic review process was employed in this research. The eligibility screening of literature involves searching using selected keywords, Boolean operators, and a wild card operator in Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science. This study identified a growing trend in the publication from 2000 to 2024, with an average yearly cumulative percentage of 4.17%. The articles are not limited to RS and GIS journals (22.22%), showing a broader interest across an array of publication domains (33.33%). Further, this study indicates a global interest in the field, with 24 countries contributing to the body of knowledge. Methodologically, assessing the military impact through change detection on land use and land cover (LULC) (55.56%) is the dominant approach, with researchers favoring the combined use of RS and GIS software (79%). Optical sensors (79.49%) with moderate spatial resolution (61.90%) are the preferred imagery types. The impact on the terrestrial environment is widespread (36.84%), often involving the entire armed forces (55.26%). Overall, this review offers information into the role of RS and GIS in assessing the environmental impacts of military operations and understanding the complex nature of the military and the environment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
1000
审稿时长
7.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Monitoring and Assessment emphasizes technical developments and data arising from environmental monitoring and assessment, the use of scientific principles in the design of monitoring systems at the local, regional and global scales, and the use of monitoring data in assessing the consequences of natural resource management actions and pollution risks to man and the environment.
期刊最新文献
Field performance evaluation of low-cost PM2.5 sensors for enhancing spatial resolution of PM2.5 monitoring: a case study in the smart city of Sejong, Korea Joint association of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon and heavy metal exposures with sex steroid hormones in children and adolescents aged 6–19 years in NHANES 2013-2016 Hydrological modeling applied to water synergy evaluation in Castanhão Reservoir, Ceará, Brazil The perspectives of remote sensing and GIS on military environmental impacts: a systematic review Influence of soil characteristics and agricultural practices on microplastic concentrations in sandy soils and their association with heavy metal contamination
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1