Cognitive regulation of alternative proteins: Positive reappraisal enhances wanting for insects, plant-based meat analogies, cultured meat, and algae

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Appetite Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.appet.2024.107842
Kosuke Motoki, Yu Qin
{"title":"Cognitive regulation of alternative proteins: Positive reappraisal enhances wanting for insects, plant-based meat analogies, cultured meat, and algae","authors":"Kosuke Motoki,&nbsp;Yu Qin","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2024.107842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Alternative proteins have attracted increasing attention from researchers and industry. Generally, consumers exhibit reluctance toward accepting alternative proteins. However, the potential of cognitive strategies to enhance consumer acceptance of alternative proteins remains unclear. Drawing on the literature on emotion regulation, we investigated whether emotion-regulation strategies, particularly positive cognitive reappraisal, could increase positive emotions and the wanting for alternative proteins. Across two pre-registered studies, our findings revealed that positive cognitive reappraisal significantly increased the wanting for various alternative proteins, including insects, plant-based meat analogs, cultured meat, and algae compared with looking at the alternative proteins. Additionally, an increase in the wanting for alternative proteins was mediated by an increase in positive emotional responses. In other words, positive cognitive reappraisal (versus looking at alternative proteins) enhances positive emotional responses to alternative proteins, which in turn enhances wanting for alternative proteins. These findings reveal the role of cognitive strategies in enhancing consumer acceptance of alternative proteins and suggest that interventions focusing on positive cognitive reappraisal could effectively increase consumer acceptance of alternative proteins.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":"206 ","pages":"Article 107842"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Appetite","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666324006469","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Alternative proteins have attracted increasing attention from researchers and industry. Generally, consumers exhibit reluctance toward accepting alternative proteins. However, the potential of cognitive strategies to enhance consumer acceptance of alternative proteins remains unclear. Drawing on the literature on emotion regulation, we investigated whether emotion-regulation strategies, particularly positive cognitive reappraisal, could increase positive emotions and the wanting for alternative proteins. Across two pre-registered studies, our findings revealed that positive cognitive reappraisal significantly increased the wanting for various alternative proteins, including insects, plant-based meat analogs, cultured meat, and algae compared with looking at the alternative proteins. Additionally, an increase in the wanting for alternative proteins was mediated by an increase in positive emotional responses. In other words, positive cognitive reappraisal (versus looking at alternative proteins) enhances positive emotional responses to alternative proteins, which in turn enhances wanting for alternative proteins. These findings reveal the role of cognitive strategies in enhancing consumer acceptance of alternative proteins and suggest that interventions focusing on positive cognitive reappraisal could effectively increase consumer acceptance of alternative proteins.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
替代蛋白质的认知调节:积极的重新评价增强了对昆虫、植物性肉类类比、培养肉和藻类的需求。
替代蛋白质已经引起了研究人员和工业界越来越多的关注。一般来说,消费者不愿意接受替代蛋白质。然而,认知策略的潜力,以提高消费者接受替代蛋白质仍不清楚。根据有关情绪调节的文献,我们研究了情绪调节策略,特别是积极的认知重新评估,是否可以增加积极情绪和对替代蛋白质的需求。在两项预先注册的研究中,我们的研究结果显示,与考虑替代蛋白质相比,积极的认知重新评估显着增加了对各种替代蛋白质的需求,包括昆虫、植物性肉类类似物、培养肉和藻类。此外,对替代蛋白质需求的增加是由积极情绪反应的增加所介导的。换句话说,积极的认知重新评估(相对于寻找替代蛋白质)增强了对替代蛋白质的积极情绪反应,这反过来又增强了对替代蛋白质的需求。这些发现揭示了认知策略在提高消费者对替代蛋白质的接受度方面的作用,并表明以积极的认知重新评估为重点的干预措施可以有效地提高消费者对替代蛋白质的接受度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Appetite
Appetite 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
566
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Appetite is an international research journal specializing in cultural, social, psychological, sensory and physiological influences on the selection and intake of foods and drinks. It covers normal and disordered eating and drinking and welcomes studies of both human and non-human animal behaviour toward food. Appetite publishes research reports, reviews and commentaries. Thematic special issues appear regularly. From time to time the journal carries abstracts from professional meetings. Submissions to Appetite are expected to be based primarily on observations directly related to the selection and intake of foods and drinks; papers that are primarily focused on topics such as nutrition or obesity will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution to the understanding of appetite in line with the journal's aims and scope.
期刊最新文献
I eat, therefore I am? Revealing differences and incongruences in dietary identities among omnivores and flexitarians in Europe. Editorial Board Beyond table manners: Children's gratitude for food and the role of parental socialization The willingness to transition to a more plant-based diet among omnivores: Determinants and socioeconomic differences Weight discrimination as a predictor of stress and eating: The role of identifying as “fat”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1