Assessing the benefit-risk profile of newer glucose-lowering drugs: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized outcome trials.

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism Pub Date : 2024-12-26 DOI:10.1111/dom.16147
Huilin Tang, Bingyu Zhang, Yiwen Lu, William T Donahoo, Naykky Singh Ospina, Pareeta Kotecha, Ying Lu, Jiayi Tong, Steven M Smith, Eric I Rosenberg, Stephen E Kimmel, Jiang Bian, Jingchuan Guo, Yong Chen
{"title":"Assessing the benefit-risk profile of newer glucose-lowering drugs: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized outcome trials.","authors":"Huilin Tang, Bingyu Zhang, Yiwen Lu, William T Donahoo, Naykky Singh Ospina, Pareeta Kotecha, Ying Lu, Jiayi Tong, Steven M Smith, Eric I Rosenberg, Stephen E Kimmel, Jiang Bian, Jingchuan Guo, Yong Chen","doi":"10.1111/dom.16147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To comprehensively evaluate the benefits and risks of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA), dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP4i), and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) from inception to November 2023 to identify randomized cardiovascular and kidney outcome trials that enrolled adults with type 2 diabetes, heart failure, or chronic kidney disease and compared DPP4i, GLP-1RAs, or SGLT2i to placebo. Twenty-one outcomes (e.g., major adverse cardiovascular events [MACE], stroke, and hospitalization for heart failure [HHF]) were assessed. Data were pooled using population-averaged odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six trials enrolling 198 177 participants were included. GLP-1RAs were most effective in lowering the risks of MACE (OR, 0.85, [95% CI, 0.79 to 0.92]) and stroke (0.84 [0.77, 0.91]), but increased the risk of thyroid cancer (1.58 [1.36, 2.50]). SGLT2i showed the greatest benefits in reducing the risk of HHF (0.68 [0.64, 0.73]) and improving composite renal outcomes (0.67 [0.58, 0.77]), but increased the risk of genital infections (3.11 [2.15, 4.50]). DPP4i were associated with a lower risk of certain psychiatric disorders, Parkinson's disease (0.54 [0.32, 0.92]), and amputation (0.70 [0.86, 0.93]), but an increased risk of neuropathy (1.10 [1.02, 1.18]) and pancreatitis (1.63 [1.40, 1.91]). The weighted origami plot suggested that GLP-1RAs were more suitable for reducing macrovascular and microvascular outcomes, while DPP4i might be better for neurodegenerative diseases and cancer concerns.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given the distinct benefit-risk profiles, the selection of glucose-lowering drugs should be individualized based on patient characteristics and risk factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":158,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.16147","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To comprehensively evaluate the benefits and risks of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA), dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP4i), and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i).

Materials and methods: A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) from inception to November 2023 to identify randomized cardiovascular and kidney outcome trials that enrolled adults with type 2 diabetes, heart failure, or chronic kidney disease and compared DPP4i, GLP-1RAs, or SGLT2i to placebo. Twenty-one outcomes (e.g., major adverse cardiovascular events [MACE], stroke, and hospitalization for heart failure [HHF]) were assessed. Data were pooled using population-averaged odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs.

Results: Twenty-six trials enrolling 198 177 participants were included. GLP-1RAs were most effective in lowering the risks of MACE (OR, 0.85, [95% CI, 0.79 to 0.92]) and stroke (0.84 [0.77, 0.91]), but increased the risk of thyroid cancer (1.58 [1.36, 2.50]). SGLT2i showed the greatest benefits in reducing the risk of HHF (0.68 [0.64, 0.73]) and improving composite renal outcomes (0.67 [0.58, 0.77]), but increased the risk of genital infections (3.11 [2.15, 4.50]). DPP4i were associated with a lower risk of certain psychiatric disorders, Parkinson's disease (0.54 [0.32, 0.92]), and amputation (0.70 [0.86, 0.93]), but an increased risk of neuropathy (1.10 [1.02, 1.18]) and pancreatitis (1.63 [1.40, 1.91]). The weighted origami plot suggested that GLP-1RAs were more suitable for reducing macrovascular and microvascular outcomes, while DPP4i might be better for neurodegenerative diseases and cancer concerns.

Conclusions: Given the distinct benefit-risk profiles, the selection of glucose-lowering drugs should be individualized based on patient characteristics and risk factors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估新型降糖药物的获益-风险概况:随机结果试验的系统回顾和网络荟萃分析。
目的:综合评价胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RA)、二肽基肽酶4抑制剂(DPP4i)和钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT2i)的获益和风险。材料和方法:系统检索PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane中央对照试验注册库(Central)从成立到2023年11月,以确定随机心血管和肾脏结局试验,纳入2型糖尿病、心力衰竭或慢性肾脏疾病的成年人,并将DPP4i、GLP-1RAs或SGLT2i与安慰剂进行比较。评估了21项结果(如主要不良心血管事件[MACE]、中风和因心力衰竭住院[HHF])。使用95% ci的人群平均优势比(ORs)对数据进行汇总。结果:纳入26项试验,共198 177名受试者。GLP-1RAs在降低MACE (OR, 0.85, [95% CI, 0.79 ~ 0.92])和卒中(0.84[0.77,0.91])的风险方面最为有效,但会增加甲状腺癌的风险(1.58[1.36,2.50])。SGLT2i在降低HHF风险(0.68[0.64,0.73])和改善肾脏综合预后(0.67[0.58,0.77])方面获益最大,但增加了生殖器感染风险(3.11[2.15,4.50])。DPP4i与某些精神疾病,帕金森病(0.54[0.32,0.92])和截肢(0.70[0.86,0.93])的风险较低相关,但与神经病变(1.10[1.02,1.18])和胰腺炎(1.63[1.40,1.91])的风险增加相关。加权折纸图显示,GLP-1RAs更适合于降低大血管和微血管的预后,而DPP4i可能更适合于神经退行性疾病和癌症。结论:鉴于不同的获益-风险概况,应根据患者特点和危险因素个性化选择降糖药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
319
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism is primarily a journal of clinical and experimental pharmacology and therapeutics covering the interrelated areas of diabetes, obesity and metabolism. The journal prioritises high-quality original research that reports on the effects of new or existing therapies, including dietary, exercise and lifestyle (non-pharmacological) interventions, in any aspect of metabolic and endocrine disease, either in humans or animal and cellular systems. ‘Metabolism’ may relate to lipids, bone and drug metabolism, or broader aspects of endocrine dysfunction. Preclinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetic studies, meta-analyses and those addressing drug safety and tolerability are also highly suitable for publication in this journal. Original research may be published as a main paper or as a research letter.
期刊最新文献
Effect of iGlarLixi on continuous glucose monitoring-measured time in range in insulin-naive adults with suboptimally controlled type 2 diabetes. MiniMed 780G system performance in older users with type 1 diabetes: Real-world evidence and the case for stricter glycaemic targets. Survey among adult users of semaglutide for weight loss in Denmark: User characteristics, treatment expectations and experienced effects. Concurrent SGLT2 inhibitor use in patients with type 2 diabetes hospitalised for high-dose corticosteroid therapy: Mitigated iatrogenic hyperglycaemia. Fibroblast growth factor 23 predicts incident diabetic kidney disease: A 4.6-year prospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1