Factors and outcomes associated with under- and overdiagnosis of sepsis in the first hour of emergency department care.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Academic Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-27 DOI:10.1111/acem.15074
Shivansh R Pandey, Sarah K S Knack, Brian E Driver, Matthew E Prekker, Nathaniel Scott, Sarah J Ringstrom, Ellen Maruggi, Olivia Kaus, Walker Tordsen, Michael A Puskarich
{"title":"Factors and outcomes associated with under- and overdiagnosis of sepsis in the first hour of emergency department care.","authors":"Shivansh R Pandey, Sarah K S Knack, Brian E Driver, Matthew E Prekker, Nathaniel Scott, Sarah J Ringstrom, Ellen Maruggi, Olivia Kaus, Walker Tordsen, Michael A Puskarich","doi":"10.1111/acem.15074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sepsis remains the leading cause of in-hospital death and one of the costliest inpatient conditions in the United States, while treatment delays worsen outcomes. We sought to determine factors and outcomes associated with a missed emergency physician (EP) diagnosis of sepsis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a secondary analysis of a prospective single-center observational cohort of undifferentiated, critically ill medical patients (September 2020-May 2022). EP gestalt of suspicion for sepsis was measured using a visual analog scale (VAS; 0%-100%) at 15 and 60 min post-patient arrival. The primary outcome was an explicit hospital discharge diagnosis of sepsis that was present on arrival. We calculated test characteristics for clinically relevant subgroups and examined factors associated with initial and persistent missed diagnoses. Associations with process (antibiotics) and clinical (mortality) outcomes were assessed after adjusting for severity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 2484 eligible patients, 275 (11%) met the primary outcome. A VAS score of ≥50 (more likely than not of being septic) at 15 min demonstrated sensitivity 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78-0.87) and specificity 0.85 (95% CI 0.83-0.86). Older age, hypoxia, hypotension, renal insufficiency, leukocytosis, and both high and low temperature were significantly associated with lower accuracy due to reduced specificity, but maintained sensitivity. Of 48 (17%) and 23 (8%) missed cases at 15 and 60 min, elevated lactate, leukocytosis, bandemia, and positive urinalysis were more common in the missed sepsis compared to nonsepsis cases. Missed diagnoses were associated with median (interquartile range) delay of 48 (27-64) min in antibiotic administration but were not independently associated with inpatient mortality as risk ratios remained close to 1 across VAS scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This prospective single-academic center study identified patient subgroups at risk of impaired diagnostic accuracy of sepsis, with clinicians often overdiagnosing rather than underdiagnosing these groups. Prompt abnormal laboratory test results can \"rescue\" initial missed diagnoses, serving as potential clinician- and systems-level intervention points to reduce missed diagnoses. Missed diagnoses delayed antibiotics, but not mortality after controlling for severity of illness.</p>","PeriodicalId":7105,"journal":{"name":"Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.15074","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sepsis remains the leading cause of in-hospital death and one of the costliest inpatient conditions in the United States, while treatment delays worsen outcomes. We sought to determine factors and outcomes associated with a missed emergency physician (EP) diagnosis of sepsis.

Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of a prospective single-center observational cohort of undifferentiated, critically ill medical patients (September 2020-May 2022). EP gestalt of suspicion for sepsis was measured using a visual analog scale (VAS; 0%-100%) at 15 and 60 min post-patient arrival. The primary outcome was an explicit hospital discharge diagnosis of sepsis that was present on arrival. We calculated test characteristics for clinically relevant subgroups and examined factors associated with initial and persistent missed diagnoses. Associations with process (antibiotics) and clinical (mortality) outcomes were assessed after adjusting for severity.

Results: Among 2484 eligible patients, 275 (11%) met the primary outcome. A VAS score of ≥50 (more likely than not of being septic) at 15 min demonstrated sensitivity 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78-0.87) and specificity 0.85 (95% CI 0.83-0.86). Older age, hypoxia, hypotension, renal insufficiency, leukocytosis, and both high and low temperature were significantly associated with lower accuracy due to reduced specificity, but maintained sensitivity. Of 48 (17%) and 23 (8%) missed cases at 15 and 60 min, elevated lactate, leukocytosis, bandemia, and positive urinalysis were more common in the missed sepsis compared to nonsepsis cases. Missed diagnoses were associated with median (interquartile range) delay of 48 (27-64) min in antibiotic administration but were not independently associated with inpatient mortality as risk ratios remained close to 1 across VAS scores.

Conclusions: This prospective single-academic center study identified patient subgroups at risk of impaired diagnostic accuracy of sepsis, with clinicians often overdiagnosing rather than underdiagnosing these groups. Prompt abnormal laboratory test results can "rescue" initial missed diagnoses, serving as potential clinician- and systems-level intervention points to reduce missed diagnoses. Missed diagnoses delayed antibiotics, but not mortality after controlling for severity of illness.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊科第一个小时脓毒症诊断不足和过度的相关因素和结果
背景:脓毒症仍然是院内死亡的主要原因,也是美国最昂贵的住院条件之一,而治疗延误会使结果恶化。我们试图确定与漏诊急诊医师(EP)败血症诊断相关的因素和结果。方法:我们对未分化危重患者(2020年9月- 2022年5月)的前瞻性单中心观察队列进行了二次分析。脓毒症疑似EP格式塔采用视觉模拟量表(VAS;0%-100%),患者到达后15和60分钟。主要结局是入院时明确的脓毒症出院诊断。我们计算了临床相关亚组的测试特征,并检查了与初始和持续漏诊相关的因素。在调整严重程度后,评估与过程(抗生素)和临床(死亡率)结果的关联。结果:在2484例符合条件的患者中,275例(11%)达到了主要终点。15分钟时,VAS评分≥50(更有可能感染脓毒症)的敏感性为0.83(95%可信区间[CI] 0.78-0.87),特异性为0.85 (95% CI 0.83-0.86)。年龄较大、缺氧、低血压、肾功能不全、白细胞增多、高温和低温均与准确性降低显著相关,特异性降低,但保持敏感性。在15和60分钟的48例(17%)和23例(8%)漏诊病例中,与非脓毒症病例相比,漏诊脓毒症患者的乳酸升高、白细胞增多、尿毒症和尿检阳性更为常见。漏诊与抗生素给药延迟的中位数(四分位数范围)为48(27-64)分钟相关,但与住院患者死亡率无关,因为VAS评分的风险比仍接近1。结论:这项前瞻性的单学术中心研究确定了脓毒症诊断准确性受损风险的患者亚组,临床医生经常过度诊断而不是低估这些组。及时的异常实验室检查结果可以“拯救”最初的漏诊,作为潜在的临床医生和系统层面的干预点,以减少漏诊。漏诊延迟了抗生素的使用,但在控制了疾病的严重程度后,没有延迟死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Emergency Medicine
Academic Emergency Medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.80%
发文量
207
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Emergency Medicine (AEM) is the official monthly publication of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) and publishes information relevant to the practice, educational advancements, and investigation of emergency medicine. It is the second-largest peer-reviewed scientific journal in the specialty of emergency medicine. The goal of AEM is to advance the science, education, and clinical practice of emergency medicine, to serve as a voice for the academic emergency medicine community, and to promote SAEM''s goals and objectives. Members and non-members worldwide depend on this journal for translational medicine relevant to emergency medicine, as well as for clinical news, case studies and more. Each issue contains information relevant to the research, educational advancements, and practice in emergency medicine. Subject matter is diverse, including preclinical studies, clinical topics, health policy, and educational methods. The research of SAEM members contributes significantly to the scientific content and development of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Low-cost interventions to increase uptake of cervical cancer screening among emergency department patients: Results of a randomized clinical trial. Will you help us? An assessment of bias in driver's license suspension based on toxicology screening of patients in serious motor vehicle collisions. Words to live by: Using medic impressions to identify the need for prehospital lifesaving interventions. Clinical trials in the emergency department: Concierge coordinators to reduce attrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1