Student negotiated syllabus and students' engagement and academic procrastination: A mixed-method study.

IF 2.1 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Acta Psychologica Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-27 DOI:10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104681
Xiao Liang, Oscar O Bautista
{"title":"Student negotiated syllabus and students' engagement and academic procrastination: A mixed-method study.","authors":"Xiao Liang, Oscar O Bautista","doi":"10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Participatory approaches in education, such as syllabus negotiation, have been suggested to enhance student autonomy, engagement, and self-regulation. However, their impact on academic procrastination and engagement still needs to be explored. The main objective of the study was to investigate the impact of the negotiated syllabus on EAP learners' engagement and procrastination in a higher education context. It also aimed to explore the learners' perceptions of the effectiveness of the negotiated syllabus. A mixed-method research design was used. For the quantitative phase, six EAP classes were divided into an experimental group (n = 139), which used a negotiated syllabus, and a control group (n = 169), which followed a traditional syllabus. For the qualitative phase, 26 students from the experimental group were selected using theoretical sampling. Quantitative data were analyzed using Multivariate Analysis of Covariance (MANCOVA), while qualitative insights were thematically analyzed. Quantitative results revealed significant engagement improvements and reductions in procrastination for the experimental group. Students reported more significant interest in course materials, increased participation, and enhanced time management. Qualitative findings supported these outcomes, highlighting the development of reflective learning and psychological flexibility among students involved in the syllabus negotiation process. These results align with self-determination, suggesting that a negotiated syllabus fosters intrinsic motivation and self-regulation. Syllabus negotiation demonstrates the considerable potential to enhance academic behaviours and support the development of essential lifelong learning skills. It can be concluded that learners' participation in the syllabus promotes student autonomy, engagement, and adaptive learning behaviours. Findings have theoretical implications for educational psychologists and applied linguists and practical consequences for EAP teachers and learners.</p>","PeriodicalId":7141,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychologica","volume":"252 ","pages":"104681"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychologica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104681","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Participatory approaches in education, such as syllabus negotiation, have been suggested to enhance student autonomy, engagement, and self-regulation. However, their impact on academic procrastination and engagement still needs to be explored. The main objective of the study was to investigate the impact of the negotiated syllabus on EAP learners' engagement and procrastination in a higher education context. It also aimed to explore the learners' perceptions of the effectiveness of the negotiated syllabus. A mixed-method research design was used. For the quantitative phase, six EAP classes were divided into an experimental group (n = 139), which used a negotiated syllabus, and a control group (n = 169), which followed a traditional syllabus. For the qualitative phase, 26 students from the experimental group were selected using theoretical sampling. Quantitative data were analyzed using Multivariate Analysis of Covariance (MANCOVA), while qualitative insights were thematically analyzed. Quantitative results revealed significant engagement improvements and reductions in procrastination for the experimental group. Students reported more significant interest in course materials, increased participation, and enhanced time management. Qualitative findings supported these outcomes, highlighting the development of reflective learning and psychological flexibility among students involved in the syllabus negotiation process. These results align with self-determination, suggesting that a negotiated syllabus fosters intrinsic motivation and self-regulation. Syllabus negotiation demonstrates the considerable potential to enhance academic behaviours and support the development of essential lifelong learning skills. It can be concluded that learners' participation in the syllabus promotes student autonomy, engagement, and adaptive learning behaviours. Findings have theoretical implications for educational psychologists and applied linguists and practical consequences for EAP teachers and learners.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学生协商教学大纲、学生投入与学业拖延:一项混合方法研究。
参与式教育方法,如教学大纲协商,已被建议提高学生的自主性,参与和自我调节。然而,它们对学业拖延和投入的影响仍有待探索。本研究的主要目的是探讨协商教学大纲对高等教育背景下EAP学习者投入和拖延的影响。它还旨在探讨学习者对协商教学大纲有效性的看法。采用混合方法设计研究。在定量阶段,6个EAP班被分为实验组(n = 139)和对照组(n = 169),实验组采用协商好的教学大纲,对照组采用传统的教学大纲。在定性阶段,采用理论抽样的方法从实验组中抽取26名学生。定量数据使用多变量协方差分析(MANCOVA)进行分析,而定性见解则进行主题分析。定量结果显示,实验组的参与度显著提高,拖延症明显减少。学生们对课程材料更感兴趣,参与度更高,时间管理能力也更强。定性研究结果支持这些结果,强调了参与教学大纲谈判过程的学生反思性学习和心理灵活性的发展。这些结果与自我决定一致,表明协商的教学大纲促进了内在动机和自我调节。教学大纲协商展示了提高学术行为和支持基本终身学习技能发展的巨大潜力。可以得出结论,学习者参与教学大纲可以促进学生的自主性、参与性和适应性学习行为。研究结果对教育心理学家和应用语言学家具有理论意义,对EAP教师和学习者具有实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Psychologica
Acta Psychologica PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
274
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Psychologica publishes original articles and extended reviews on selected books in any area of experimental psychology. The focus of the Journal is on empirical studies and evaluative review articles that increase the theoretical understanding of human capabilities.
期刊最新文献
Psychosocial and mental health status among older adults in China during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study. Threat perception and behavioral reactivity in response to an acute stressor in infant rhesus macaques. Predictors of schoolteachers' intention to report suspected child abuse and neglect cases in Oman: A national study. The effects of image resolution and exposure duration on facial beauty and ugliness evaluations. Effect of floral therapy in mothers of premature newborns: A randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1