Functional Liver Imaging Score (FLIS) as imaging parameter for predicting post-hepatectomy complications in patients with liver cirrhosis.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Acta radiologica Pub Date : 2024-12-26 DOI:10.1177/02841851241299088
Yea Hee Ji, Il Wan Son, Seung Baek Hong, Nam Kyung Lee, Suk Kim, Hyung Il Seo, Byeong Gwan Noh
{"title":"Functional Liver Imaging Score (FLIS) as imaging parameter for predicting post-hepatectomy complications in patients with liver cirrhosis.","authors":"Yea Hee Ji, Il Wan Son, Seung Baek Hong, Nam Kyung Lee, Suk Kim, Hyung Il Seo, Byeong Gwan Noh","doi":"10.1177/02841851241299088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Liver dysfunction has been reported as a risk factor for predicting complications after hepatectomy. In patients with liver cirrhosis (LC) who underwent hepatectomy, a Functional Liver Imaging Score (FLIS), derived from gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), has never been investigated as a predictor of clinically significant post-hepatectomy complications.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate whether FLIS can predict post-hepatectomy complications in patients with LC.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted of patients with LC who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and hepatectomy. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression was used to identify clinicopathological and radiologic findings associated with the development of major complication (Clavien-Dindo classification [CDC] ≥ III). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the cutoff value of FLIS for predicting CDC ≥ III.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the finally included 106 patients (77 men; mean age = 62.5 ± 8.3 years), 12 patients had a CDC ≥ III. Multivariable analysis showed that only FLIS independently predicted post-hepatectomy complications (odds ratio = 0.02; <i>P </i>= 0.01). ROC analysis suggested the FLIS ≤ 4 was the optimal cutoff for predicting CDC ≥ III (AUC value = 0.94; sensitivity = 91.67%; specificity = 95.74%; positive likelihood ratio = 21.54; and negative likelihood ratio = 0.09).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with LC, FLIS was an independent predictor of post-hepatectomy complications. FLIS showed excellent diagnostic performance in predicting post-hepatectomy complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":7143,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica","volume":" ","pages":"2841851241299088"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851241299088","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Liver dysfunction has been reported as a risk factor for predicting complications after hepatectomy. In patients with liver cirrhosis (LC) who underwent hepatectomy, a Functional Liver Imaging Score (FLIS), derived from gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), has never been investigated as a predictor of clinically significant post-hepatectomy complications.

Purpose: To evaluate whether FLIS can predict post-hepatectomy complications in patients with LC.

Material and methods: A retrospective review was conducted of patients with LC who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and hepatectomy. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression was used to identify clinicopathological and radiologic findings associated with the development of major complication (Clavien-Dindo classification [CDC] ≥ III). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the cutoff value of FLIS for predicting CDC ≥ III.

Results: Of the finally included 106 patients (77 men; mean age = 62.5 ± 8.3 years), 12 patients had a CDC ≥ III. Multivariable analysis showed that only FLIS independently predicted post-hepatectomy complications (odds ratio = 0.02; P = 0.01). ROC analysis suggested the FLIS ≤ 4 was the optimal cutoff for predicting CDC ≥ III (AUC value = 0.94; sensitivity = 91.67%; specificity = 95.74%; positive likelihood ratio = 21.54; and negative likelihood ratio = 0.09).

Conclusion: In patients with LC, FLIS was an independent predictor of post-hepatectomy complications. FLIS showed excellent diagnostic performance in predicting post-hepatectomy complications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta radiologica
Acta radiologica 医学-核医学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Radiologica publishes articles on all aspects of radiology, from clinical radiology to experimental work. It is known for articles based on experimental work and contrast media research, giving priority to scientific original papers. The distinguished international editorial board also invite review articles, short communications and technical and instrumental notes.
期刊最新文献
The use of dual and triple rule-out computerized tomography angiography by using diagnostic low-dose contrast material and radiation in acute chest pain. Functional Liver Imaging Score (FLIS) as imaging parameter for predicting post-hepatectomy complications in patients with liver cirrhosis. Solid-type adenocarcinoma on thin-section CT: quantitative parameters from dual-energy CT associated with spread through air spaces. The predictive factors for in-stent restenosis after interventional treatment of chronic carotid artery occlusion. Strategic approach to embolization of coronary to pulmonary artery fistulas: a technical note.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1