Surgical Morbidity following Planned Hysterectomy versus Conservative Management for Placenta Accreta Spectrum: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY American journal of perinatology Pub Date : 2024-12-28 DOI:10.1055/a-2491-4328
Itamar D Futterman, Cintia Gomes, Olivia Sher, Julia Fisher, Rodney A McLaren, Shoshana Haberman, Scott Chudnoff
{"title":"Surgical Morbidity following Planned Hysterectomy versus Conservative Management for Placenta Accreta Spectrum: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Itamar D Futterman, Cintia Gomes, Olivia Sher, Julia Fisher, Rodney A McLaren, Shoshana Haberman, Scott Chudnoff","doi":"10.1055/a-2491-4328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> In recent years, the management of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) has fallen into two categories: planned hysterectomy and conservative management to preserve fertility. However, optimal management remains unclear. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the two to evaluate which approach was associated with lower surgical morbidity.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong> MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to July 31, 2023, for trials comparing conservative management versus planned hysterectomy. We included all prospective or retrospective cohort studies, case-control studies, and randomized control studies that reported outcomes related to surgical morbidity in cases of PAS. Surgical morbidity was defined as rates of intensive care unit (ICU) admission, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC)/coagulopathy, bladder injury, number of units of packed red blood cells (PRBCs) transfused, estimated blood loss (EBL), and maternal mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Odds ratios (ORs) were computed with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a fixed or random effects model. Among 839 studies initially retrieved, 12 were included with a total of 1,167 patients. Of these, 669 (57.3%) underwent conservative management and 498 (42.7%) underwent a planned hysterectomy. Conservative management resulted in lower rates of ICU admission (OR = 0.11; 95% CI: 0.04, 0.35), lower rates of bladder injury (OR = 0.31; 95% CI: 0.2, 0.48), lower incidence of DIC or coagulopathy (OR = 0.22; 95% CI: 0.10, 0.48), lower mean difference EBL (-1,292.81 mL; 95% CI: -1,922.16 to -593.46), as well as lower number of PRBC units transfused (-1.54 units; 95% CI: -2.29 to -0.78).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Our findings suggest that conservative management of PAS may be associated with reduced surgical morbidity.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>· management of PAS has fallen into two categories: planned hysterectomy and conservative management.. · Optimal management for PAS remains unclear.. · conservative management of PAS may be associated with reduced surgical morbidity..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2491-4328","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective:  In recent years, the management of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) has fallen into two categories: planned hysterectomy and conservative management to preserve fertility. However, optimal management remains unclear. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the two to evaluate which approach was associated with lower surgical morbidity.

Study design:  MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to July 31, 2023, for trials comparing conservative management versus planned hysterectomy. We included all prospective or retrospective cohort studies, case-control studies, and randomized control studies that reported outcomes related to surgical morbidity in cases of PAS. Surgical morbidity was defined as rates of intensive care unit (ICU) admission, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC)/coagulopathy, bladder injury, number of units of packed red blood cells (PRBCs) transfused, estimated blood loss (EBL), and maternal mortality.

Results:  Odds ratios (ORs) were computed with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a fixed or random effects model. Among 839 studies initially retrieved, 12 were included with a total of 1,167 patients. Of these, 669 (57.3%) underwent conservative management and 498 (42.7%) underwent a planned hysterectomy. Conservative management resulted in lower rates of ICU admission (OR = 0.11; 95% CI: 0.04, 0.35), lower rates of bladder injury (OR = 0.31; 95% CI: 0.2, 0.48), lower incidence of DIC or coagulopathy (OR = 0.22; 95% CI: 0.10, 0.48), lower mean difference EBL (-1,292.81 mL; 95% CI: -1,922.16 to -593.46), as well as lower number of PRBC units transfused (-1.54 units; 95% CI: -2.29 to -0.78).

Conclusion:  Our findings suggest that conservative management of PAS may be associated with reduced surgical morbidity.

Key points: · management of PAS has fallen into two categories: planned hysterectomy and conservative management.. · Optimal management for PAS remains unclear.. · conservative management of PAS may be associated with reduced surgical morbidity..

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
计划子宫切除术后的手术发病率与保守治疗胎盘增生谱:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:近年来,对胎盘增生谱(PAS)的治疗分为两大类:计划子宫切除术和保守治疗以保持生育能力。然而,最佳管理仍不清楚。因此,我们进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,比较了两种方法,以评估哪种方法与较低的手术发病率相关。研究设计:检索MEDLINE、Scopus、Cochrane Library和ClinicalTrials.gov,从成立到2023年7月31日,比较保守治疗和计划子宫切除术的试验。我们纳入了所有前瞻性或回顾性队列研究、病例对照研究和随机对照研究,这些研究报告了PAS病例中与手术发病率相关的结果。手术并发症的定义为重症监护病房(ICU)入院率、弥散性血管内凝血(DIC)/凝血功能障碍、膀胱损伤、输注红细胞(红细胞)单位数、估计失血量(EBL)和孕产妇死亡率。结果:使用固定或随机效应模型计算95%置信区间(ci)的优势比(ORs)。在最初检索的839项研究中,纳入了12项研究,共计1167名患者。其中,669例(57.3%)接受了保守治疗,498例(42.7%)接受了计划子宫切除术。保守治疗导致ICU住院率较低(OR = 0.11;95% CI: 0.04, 0.35),膀胱损伤发生率较低(OR = 0.31;95% CI: 0.2, 0.48),较低的DIC或凝血功能障碍发生率(or = 0.22;95% CI: 0.10, 0.48),较低的平均差EBL (-1,292.81 mL;95% CI: -1,922.16至-593.46),以及输血PRBC单位数较低(-1.54单位;95% CI: -2.29至-0.78)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,PAS的保守治疗可能与降低手术发病率有关。·PAS的治疗分为两类:计划子宫切除术和保守治疗。·PAS的最佳管理仍不明确。·PAS的保守治疗可能与降低手术发病率相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
期刊最新文献
The Relationship between Various Measures of Perinatal Quality. The Use of Premedication for Intubating Very Low Birth Weight Infants in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: Results of a National Survey. The Impact of Antibiotics on Latency When Given at the Time of Membrane Rupture Before Viability. Intrapartum Glycemic Control with Insulin Infusion versus Rotating Fluids: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Maternal and Neonatal Risk Factors Associated with Positive Toxicology Results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1