Toward value-based care using cost mining: cost aggregation and visualization across the entire colorectal cancer patient pathway.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMC Medical Research Methodology Pub Date : 2024-12-27 DOI:10.1186/s12874-024-02446-5
Maura Leusder, Sven Relijveld, Derya Demirtas, Jon Emery, Michelle Tew, Peter Gibbs, Jeremy Millar, Victoria White, Michael Jefford, Fanny Franchini, Maarten IJzerman
{"title":"Toward value-based care using cost mining: cost aggregation and visualization across the entire colorectal cancer patient pathway.","authors":"Maura Leusder, Sven Relijveld, Derya Demirtas, Jon Emery, Michelle Tew, Peter Gibbs, Jeremy Millar, Victoria White, Michael Jefford, Fanny Franchini, Maarten IJzerman","doi":"10.1186/s12874-024-02446-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study is to develop a method we call \"cost mining\" to unravel cost variation and identify cost drivers by modelling integrated patient pathways from primary care to the palliative care setting. This approach fills an urgent need to quantify financial strains on healthcare systems, particularly for colorectal cancer, which is the most expensive cancer in Australia, and the second most expensive cancer globally.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed and published a customized algorithm that dynamically estimates and visualizes the mean, minimum, and total costs of care at the patient level, by aggregating activity-based healthcare system costs (e.g. DRGs) across integrated pathways. This extends traditional process mining approaches by making the resulting process maps actionable and informative and by displaying cost estimates. We demonstrate the method by constructing a unique dataset of colorectal cancer pathways in Victoria, Australia, using records of primary care, diagnosis, hospital admission and chemotherapy, medication, health system costs, and life events to create integrated colorectal cancer patient pathways from 2012 to 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cost mining with the algorithm enabled exploration of costly integrated pathways, i.e. drilling down in high-cost pathways to discover cost drivers, for 4246 cases covering approx. 4 million care activities. Per-patient CRC pathway costs ranged from $10,379 AUD to $41,643 AUD, and varied significantly per cancer stage such that e.g. chemotherapy costs in one cancer stage are different to the same chemotherapy regimen in a different stage. Admitted episodes were most costly, representing 93.34% or $56.6 M AUD of the total healthcare system costs covered in the sample.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cost mining can supplement other health economic methods by providing contextual, sequence and timing-related information depicting how patients flow through complex care pathways. This approach can also facilitate health economic studies informing decision-makers on where to target care improvement or to evaluate the consequences of new treatments or care delivery interventions. Through this study we provide an approach for hospitals and policymakers to leverage their health data infrastructure and to enable real time patient level cost mining.</p>","PeriodicalId":9114,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","volume":"24 1","pages":"321"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11681630/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-024-02446-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study is to develop a method we call "cost mining" to unravel cost variation and identify cost drivers by modelling integrated patient pathways from primary care to the palliative care setting. This approach fills an urgent need to quantify financial strains on healthcare systems, particularly for colorectal cancer, which is the most expensive cancer in Australia, and the second most expensive cancer globally.

Methods: We developed and published a customized algorithm that dynamically estimates and visualizes the mean, minimum, and total costs of care at the patient level, by aggregating activity-based healthcare system costs (e.g. DRGs) across integrated pathways. This extends traditional process mining approaches by making the resulting process maps actionable and informative and by displaying cost estimates. We demonstrate the method by constructing a unique dataset of colorectal cancer pathways in Victoria, Australia, using records of primary care, diagnosis, hospital admission and chemotherapy, medication, health system costs, and life events to create integrated colorectal cancer patient pathways from 2012 to 2020.

Results: Cost mining with the algorithm enabled exploration of costly integrated pathways, i.e. drilling down in high-cost pathways to discover cost drivers, for 4246 cases covering approx. 4 million care activities. Per-patient CRC pathway costs ranged from $10,379 AUD to $41,643 AUD, and varied significantly per cancer stage such that e.g. chemotherapy costs in one cancer stage are different to the same chemotherapy regimen in a different stage. Admitted episodes were most costly, representing 93.34% or $56.6 M AUD of the total healthcare system costs covered in the sample.

Conclusions: Cost mining can supplement other health economic methods by providing contextual, sequence and timing-related information depicting how patients flow through complex care pathways. This approach can also facilitate health economic studies informing decision-makers on where to target care improvement or to evaluate the consequences of new treatments or care delivery interventions. Through this study we provide an approach for hospitals and policymakers to leverage their health data infrastructure and to enable real time patient level cost mining.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用成本挖掘实现基于价值的护理:整个结直肠癌患者途径的成本汇总和可视化。
背景:本研究的目的是开发一种我们称之为“成本挖掘”的方法,通过模拟从初级保健到姑息治疗设置的综合患者路径来揭示成本变化并确定成本驱动因素。这种方法满足了量化医疗保健系统财务压力的迫切需要,特别是对于结直肠癌,这是澳大利亚最昂贵的癌症,也是全球第二大癌症。方法:我们开发并发布了一种定制算法,该算法通过汇总基于活动的医疗保健系统成本(例如DRGs),动态估计和可视化患者层面的平均、最小和总护理成本。这扩展了传统的流程挖掘方法,使生成的流程映射具有可操作性和信息性,并显示成本估算。我们通过构建澳大利亚维多利亚州结直肠癌途径的独特数据集来证明该方法,该数据集使用初级保健,诊断,住院和化疗,药物,卫生系统成本和生活事件的记录来创建2012年至2020年的综合结直肠癌患者途径。结果:使用该算法进行成本挖掘,可以探索昂贵的综合路径,即在高成本路径中向下钻取以发现成本驱动因素,涉及约42446个案例。400万护理活动。每位患者的CRC通路费用从$10,379澳元到$41,643澳元不等,并且每个癌症阶段差异显著,例如,一个癌症阶段的化疗费用与不同阶段的相同化疗方案的费用不同。入院的发作是最昂贵的,占样本所涵盖的医疗保健系统总成本的93.34%或5660万澳元。结论:成本挖掘可以通过提供情境、顺序和时间相关的信息来描述患者如何通过复杂的护理路径,从而补充其他卫生经济学方法。这一方法还可以促进卫生经济学研究,为决策者提供信息,使其了解在何处以改善护理为目标,或评估新治疗方法或提供护理干预措施的后果。通过这项研究,我们为医院和政策制定者提供了一种方法来利用他们的健康数据基础设施,并实现实时的患者级成本挖掘。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Research Methodology
BMC Medical Research Methodology 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
298
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Research Methodology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in methodological approaches to healthcare research. Articles on the methodology of epidemiological research, clinical trials and meta-analysis/systematic review are particularly encouraged, as are empirical studies of the associations between choice of methodology and study outcomes. BMC Medical Research Methodology does not aim to publish articles describing scientific methods or techniques: these should be directed to the BMC journal covering the relevant biomedical subject area.
期刊最新文献
A generative model for evaluating missing data methods in large epidemiological cohorts. Discrepancies in safety reporting for chronic back pain clinical trials: an observational study from ClinicalTrials.gov and publications. Multiple states clustering analysis (MSCA), an unsupervised approach to multiple time-to-event electronic health records applied to multimorbidity associated with myocardial infarction. Matching plus regression adjustment for the estimation of the average treatment effect on survival outcomes: a case study with mosunetuzumab in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma. Protocol publication rate and comparison between article, registry and protocol in RCTs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1